Skip to main content

From The Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah

  • Chapter
Americanist Culture History
  • 468 Accesses

Abstract

DEVELOPMENTS during the last 10 years make it apparent that the time has come for a general consideration of cultural classification and taxonomic determination, or systematics, as applied to archaeology. In a few recent articles, particularly by Kidder. Roberts, and Kluckhohn, critical discussion of our current Southwestern systematics has appeared. With the exception of the last named, this, however, has been very limited, largely because included in short papers or in introductions to monographs. A few writers have referred to difficulties in the application of systematic methods but have tacitly or expressly passed them off as unworthy of discussion longer than a few sentences or paragraphs. With this I do not agree. The present condition of archaeological research in the Southwestern field leads me to believe that a thorough and careful examination into the mechanical processes of classification, and into the logical assumptions behind it, is not only desirable but necessary.

Scepticism is a powerful aid to scientific thought. One must be bold enough to cast doubt both upon the theories of others and upon one’s own, and even upon the foundations of one’s own science and its method.

— Tallgren

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  • Arkell, W. J. and J. A. Moy-Thomas 1940 Palaeontology and the Taxonomic Problem. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 395–410. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William 1913 Problems of Genetics. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bather, F. A. 1927 Biological Classification: Past and Future. Geological Society Quarterly Journal 83(2):1xii–civ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremekamp, C. E. B. 1931 The Principles of Taxonomy and the Theory of Evolution. South African Biological Society Pamphlet No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman, W. T. 1940 A Museum Zoologist’s View of Taxonomy. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 455–459. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, Harold S. 1939a Prehistoric Culture Units and Their Rela- tionships in Northern Arizona. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 17. Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, Harold S. 1939b The Reducing Atmosphere and Oxidizing Atmosphere in Prehistoric Southwestern Ceramics. American Antiquity4: 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colton, Harold S. and Lyndon L. Hargrave 1937 Handbook of Northern Arizona Pottery Wares. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 11. Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles 1859 Origin of Species, 6th edition. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Bashford 1916 Notes on Arms and Armor. Metropolitan Museum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle, H. 1938 The Rational and Empirical Elements in Physics. Philosophy13: 148–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diver, C. 1940 The Problem of Closely Related Species Living in the Same Area. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 303–328. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. H(olmes) 1940 Flint-Working Techniques of the American Indians: An Experimental Study. The Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, James A. 1938 A Chronological Method Applicable to the Southeast. American Antiquity3: 260–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J. S. L. 1940 Taxonomy and Philosophy. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 461–474. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Harold S. 1937 Excavations at Snaketown, II, Comparisons and Theories. Medallion Papers No. 26. Globe, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Harold S. 1942 Excavations at Snaketown, III, Revisions. Medallion Papers No. 30. Globe, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Winifred and Harold S. Gladwin 1930 A Method for the Designation of Southwestern Pottery Types. Medallion Papers No. 7. Globe, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Winifred and Harold S. Gladwin 1934 A Method for the Designation of Cultures and Their Variations. Medallion Papers No. 15. Globe, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, Lyndon L. 1932 Guide to Forty Pottery Types from the Hopi Country and the San Francisco Mountains, Arizona. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin 1. Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Florence M. 1938 The Family Tree of Chaco Canyon Masonry. American Antiquity3: 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lanceolot 1940 Problems of the Origins of Species. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 269–286. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. 1877 A Manual of the Anatomy of Invertebrated Animals. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, Alfred Vincent and Anna O. Shepard 1936 The Pottery of Pecos, Vol II. Papers of the Southwestern Expedition, Phillips Academy, No. 7. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Clyde 1939b The Place of Theory in Anthropological Studies. Philosophy of Science6: 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Clyde and Paul Reiter (editors) 1939 Preliminary Report on the 1937 Excavations, BC 50–51, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. University of New Mexico Bulletin 345, Anthropological Series 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothrop, S. K. 1941 Review of Rouse, 1939. American Antiquity6: 364–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckern, William C. 1939 The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an Aid to Archaeological Study. American Antiquity4: 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. 1916 A Critique of the Theory of Evolution. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. 1925 Evolution and Genetics. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movius, Hallam L., Jr. 1942 The Irish Stone Age; Its Chronology, Development, and Relationships. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Ernest J. 1943 The Species Concept in Crataegus. Chronica Botanica8: 373–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond, Alonzo W. no date, Primitive Methods of Working Stone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond, Alonzo W. ca. 1930 Based on Experiments of Halvor L. Skavlem. Logan Museum Bulletin2 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaud, E. 1920 Éléments de Biologie Générale. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, C. T. 1926 Organic Evolution. British Association Report for 1925, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, G. C. 1928 The Species Problem. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Irving B. 1939 Prehistory of Haiti, A Study in Method. Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, John Howland 1940 Excavations in the Waterside Shell Heap, Frenchman’s Bay, Maine. Excavators’ Club Papers 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, Anna O. 1936 The Technology of Pecos Pottery. In The Pottery of Pecos, Vol. II, by A. V. Kidder and A. O. Shepard, pp. 389–587. Papers of the Southwestern Expedition. Phillips Academy, No. 7. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, Anna O. 1939 Technology of La Plata Pottery. In Archaeological Studies in the La Plata District, Southwestern Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico, by E. H. Morris, pp. 249–287. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, John 1940 Entomological Systematics Examined as a Practical Problem. In The New Systematics, edited by Julian S. Huxley, pp. 475–492. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, Julian H. 1941a Review of Colton, 1939a. American Antiquity6: 366–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, William D. 1936 Anthropological Theory and Archaeological Fact. In Essays in Anthropology Presented to A. L. Kroeber, edited by R. H. Lowie, pp. 359–368. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallgren, A. M. 1937 The Method of Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity11: 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, S. 1933a Sinanthropus and Other Fossil Men: The Relations to Each Other and Modern Types. Eugenics Review24 (4): 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, S 1933b Functional Affinities of Man, Monkeys, and Apes: A Study of the Bearings of Physiology and Behaviour on the Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Lemurs, Monkeys, Apes, and Man. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brew, J.O. (1997). From The Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah . In: Lyman, R.L., O’Brien, M.J., Dunnell, R.C. (eds) Americanist Culture History. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5911-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5911-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45540-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5911-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics