What Can We Learn from Dynamic Behavior of Systems



Increasingly, management scientists have paid attention to developments in other sciences, which could be of interest for improved understanding of the complex behavior of systems in a managerial context. The sciences which are working with non-linear and dynamic systems are multiple and therefore we want to limit this overview. Those sciences which we have a look into are: physics, neurobiology, cognitive psychology and computer sciences. For a better understanding of systems behavior (e.g. market behavior) we need to attack some theoretical concepts. We will limit them as much as possible. For each concept a brief theoretical introduction is given but we also try to make it more accessible for the manager via examples. Each of the concepts refers to a limited bibliography in itself. Some reference works will be given which allows the interested reader to go a little further, without becoming too involved in the details. The suggested books, in turn, all have an extended bibliography for the very interested or very advanced reader.


Chaotic System Tacit Knowledge Knowledge Technology Knowledge Creation Strange Attractor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abraham R and Shaw C, 1983. Dynamics: the Geometry of Behavior (4 vols.). Santa Cruz: Aerial Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angell I and Smithson S, 1991. Information Systems Management. London: Macmillan Information Systems Series.Google Scholar
  3. Applegate L, Cash J and Mills D, 1988. Information Technology and Tomorrow’s Manager. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 66, November-December, pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
  4. Caverni J P, Bastien C, Mendelsohn P, Tigerghien G, (eds.), 1991. Psychologie cognitive: Modèles et Méthodes. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  5. Cleeremans A, 1993. Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crutchfield J, Farmer J, Packard N and Shaw R, 1986. Chaos. Scientific American. December, pp. 38–49.Google Scholar
  7. Daft R L and Huber G. How organizations learn: a communication framework in Research in sociology of organizations (Edited by Bucharach S and Tomasso N), Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI press.Google Scholar
  8. de Callatay A, 1992. Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Misconceptions about Brains and Neural Networks. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. de Geus A, 1988. Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review. March/April, pp. 70–74.Google Scholar
  10. Devenay R, 1986. An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Menlo Park: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
  11. Dixon N M, 1992. Organizational Learning: A Review of the literature with implications for HRD Professionals. Human Resource Development Quarterly. Nr. 3 (Spring), pp. 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreyfus H, 1993. What computers still cannot do. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drucker PF, 1988. The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review. Jan-Feb, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrlich M F, Tardieu H and Cavazza M (eds.), 1993. Les Modèles Mentaux: Approche cognitive des représentations. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin S, 1995. Artificial Minds. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garvin DA, 1993. Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business review. July-August, pp. 78–91.Google Scholar
  17. Genelot D, 1992. Manager dans la complexité. Insep Editions.Google Scholar
  18. Gleick J, 1988. Chaos: Making a new science. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Holden A (ed.), 1986. Chaos. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Khalfa J (ed.), 1994. What is Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lee S, Courtney J F, and O’Keefe R M, 1992. A System for organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps. OMEGA. Vol. 20, Nr. 1, pp. 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lessem R, 1991. Total Quality Learning - Building a Learning organization. Oxford, UK: Bassil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Mandelbrot B, 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  24. Maturana H and Varela F, 1984. The tree of knowledge, The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Scherz Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Merry U, 1995. Coping with uncertainty: Insights from the new sciences of chaos, self organization and complexity. Praeger.Google Scholar
  26. Nicolis G and Prigogine I, 1989. Exploring Complexity. Freeman.Google Scholar
  27. Nonaka I, 1988. Towards middle-up-down management: accelerating information creation. Sloan Management Review. Vol. 29, Nr. 3.Google Scholar
  28. Nonaka I, 1991. The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review. Year 69, Nr. 6.Google Scholar
  29. Pedler M, Burgoyne J and Boydell T, 1991. The Learning Company - A Strategy for Sustainable Development. London: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  30. Peters E, 1991. Chaos and order in the capital markets. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Quinn J B, 1992. Intelligent Enterprise. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schuster H, 1984. Deterministic Chaos: an Introduction. Weinheim: Physik-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Shukla M, 1994. Knowledge-based Organizations: How companies use knowledge as a Strategic Leverage (Unpublished manuscript). XLRI Jamshedpur (India)/ESADE (Barcelona).Google Scholar
  34. Stacey R, 1992. Managing Chaos. Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart I, 1987. The Problem of mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart I, 1989. Does God Play Dice: The Mathematics of Chaos. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Swieringa J and Wierdsma A, 1993. The learning organization. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson J and Stewart H, 1986. Non-linear Dynamics and Chaos. NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Winograd T and Flores F, 1986. Understanding computers and cognition. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Netherlands Business SchoolNijenrode UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations