Skip to main content

Restructuring and Competitive Arrangements in the Electricity Supply Industry Towards a Better Efficiency?

  • Chapter
Deregulation of Electric Utilities

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 28))

Abstract

The technological specificities of the electricity filière, calling for high levels of technical co-ordination between its stages, has in the past been reflected by the long domination of an industrial organization based on vertical and horizontal integration and a regulated supply monopoly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, M., Cowan, S. and Vickers, J. (1994). Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., Dunn, W. and Shean, M. (1994). Pratical Considerations in Restructuring of Electricity Supply Industries. From Regulation to Competition: New Frontiers In Electricity Markets. In Einhorn, M.A., editor, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, p. 151–173.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., Panzar, J. and Willig, R. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouttes, J.P. and Lederer, P. (1991). Electricity Monopoly Versus Competition? Utilities Policy, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. and Weyman-Jones, T. (1997). Periodic Regulatory Review in UK Electricity Markets; Developments Within a Deregulated System. Deregulation of Electric Utilities. In Lapointe et al, editors, Kluwer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. and Doyle, Ch. (1994). Access Pricing in Network Utilities in Theory and Practice. Utilities Policy, 4(3):181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, A. (1993). Energy Financing: An Institutional Challenge. WEG Pacific/Asia Energy Financing Forum, Hong Kong, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cichetti, C. and Sepetys, K. (1996). Regulating Competition: Transition or Travesty? The Electricity Journal, 9(4):68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E. (1996). Electric Utility Regulation in the European Union: a Country by Country Guide. Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paoli, L. and Finon, D. (1993). Implications of Community Policy for the Electricity Industry. Utilities Policy, August, 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eto, J. and Hirst, E. (1996). What Kind of Future for Energy Efficiency? The Electricity Journal, 9(5):76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FERC (1996). Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non Discriminatory Transmission Service by Public Utilities. Order no 888 final rule.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessier, D. (1996). Is a social perspective sustainable in the changing dynamic of the electric services industry? (CGEMP Conference, Paris-Dauphine, March 26, 1996). Miméo: CPUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finon, D. (1995). La diversification des modèles d’organisation des industries électriques dans le monde: une mise en perspective. Revue de l’énergie, 465:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finon, D. (1996a). Environnement institutionnel et dynamique des industries électriques. Miméo: Grenoble (Cahier de Recherches de 1TEPE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finon, D. (1996b). La maîtrise de la demande d’électricité, innovation réglementaire ou nouvel instrument de stratégie commerciale? Revue de VEnergie, 483:607–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusaro, P. (1995). Competition and Power Pooling in the Electricity Industry: the Desirability of Free Markets. Oxford Energy Forum, 23:14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. and Kahn, E. eds. (1996). International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glachant, J.M. (1995). Économie des transactions et marchés de l’électricité: les analyses américaines et l’expérience britannique. Communication at the XLIVe Congress of AFSE, Paris, September 21-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glachant, J.M. (1996). Le système électrique britannique: un modèle européen? Communication at “Les services publics et l’Europe” Colloquium. Institut d’Etudes Européennes, Bruxelles, December 13-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. and Newbery D. (1996). Regulation, Public Ownership and Privatisation of the English Electricity Regulation. International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation. In Gilbert, R. and Kahn, E. editors, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. and Newbery, D. (1992). Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Journal of Policy Economy, 100:929–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E., Helm, D. and Thompson, D. (1989). Competition in Electricity Supply: Has the Energy Act Failed? The market for energy. In Helm, D., Kay, J. and Thompson, D., editors, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, G. (1995). Les résultats de la réforme de l’industrie électrique en Argentine. Revue de l’Énergie, 465:102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (1994). Regulating the Transition to the Competitive Electricity Market. In Institute of Economics Affairs. Regulating utilities: the way forward. IEA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (1996). Marché européen de distribution d’électricité et du gaz. Communication at Jules Dupuits Conferences, Nov. 21, 1996, ENPC, Paris (Miméo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henney, A. and Grisp, S. (1997). Lessons for the US? Transmission Pricing, Constraints and Gaming in England and Wales. The Electricity Journal, Jan.-Feb., p. 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, R. (1989). Technology and Transformation in the American Electricity Utility Industry. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. and Kirby, B. (1995). Restructuring: The devil is in the details. The Electricity Journal, December, p. 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. (1995a). Electricity Transmission Policy and Promoting Wholesale Competition. (Initial response to the NOPR on Wholesale competition of the FERC). FERC, Docket no RM 95-8-000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. (1995b). Must the exchange be run by the ISO? The Electricity Journal, 8(10):26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. (1992). Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4(3):211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (1994). Electricity Supply Industry: Structure Ownership and Regulation in OECD Countries. OCDE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (1996). Introducing Competition Into Regulated Network Industries: From Hierarchies to Markets in Electricity. Industry and Corporate Change, 5(2):341–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. and Schmalensee, R. (1983). Markets for Power. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J. and Tirole, J. (1992). Access Pricing and Competition. IDEI, Université de Toulouse. Research paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J. and Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives of Procurement and Regulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. and Spiller, P. (1994). The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Middtun, A. (1995). Norwegian Electricity Reform: A Case of Competitive Regulation. Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Miméo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, J. (1995). Electric Utility Regulation, Structure and Competition Experiences from the Norvegian Electric Supply Industry. NVE, Oslo, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. (1995). Power Markets and Market Power. The Energy Journal, 16(3):39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. and Green R. (1995). Regulation, Public Ownership and Privatization of the English Electricity Industry. International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation. In Gilbert, R. and Kahn, E. editors, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFFER (1995). The Competitive Electricity Market from 1998: The Next Steps. August.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assesment) (1989). Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing. GPO, Washington, May 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. and Surrey, J. (1994). UK Gas Policy: Regulated Monopoly or Managed Competition? SPRU Special Report, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, M. and Williamson, O. (1985). Asset Specificity and Economic Organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3:365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steim, H. (1996). Power Trading: Becoming a Fact of Life in the USA. Electrical World, February, p. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surrey, J. ed. (1996). The British Electricity Experiment. Privatization: The Record, The Issues, The Lessons. Earthscan Publication, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennenbaum, B., Lock, R. and Barker, J. (1992). Electricity Privatization: Structural, Competitive and Regulatory Options. Energy Policy, 20(12):1134–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (1996). Strategic Government and Corporate Issues. The British Electricity Experiment In Surrey, J. editor, Earthscan Publication, London, p. 255–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union Européenne (1997). Directive concernant des règles communes pour le marché européen de l’électricité (dir. 96/92/CE). Journal officiel des Communautés Européennes, January 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quaterly, 36:269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1993). Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2):107–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, G. (1992). British electricity prices since privatization. Regulatory Policy Institute, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finon, D. (1998). Restructuring and Competitive Arrangements in the Electricity Supply Industry Towards a Better Efficiency?. In: Zaccour, G. (eds) Deregulation of Electric Utilities. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5729-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5729-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7624-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5729-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics