Abstract
It may well be the case that no topic is more intensely debated in the evaluation community than the topic of evaluation metrics. For every advocate of a particular metric there will be those who are equally critical. Why such a debate? The debate concerns substantive issues about the choice of appropriate discount rates and appropriate procedures for dealing with mathematical complexities, such as multiple rates of return, that can obscure economic interpretations. We have chosen to leave the debate outside the scope of our inquiry, and instead discuss three performance evaluation metrics used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST has “standardized” on three performance evaluation metrics, and those three metrics are discussed in this chapter: the internal rate of return, the implied rate of return or adjusted internal rate of return, and the ratio of benefits-tocosts. A fourth metric, net present value, is readily derived from the information developed for the benefit-to-cost ratio.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Link, A.N., Scott, J.T. (1998). Performance Evaluation Metrics. In: Public Accountability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5639-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5639-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7580-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5639-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive