Abstract
Project scheduling represents the biggest part of project modeling research. More and more hypotheses have to be done on the project to apply scheduling algorithms. From an other point of view, detailed scheduling is not the only problem in project modeling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Eisner, H. 1962. A generalized network approach to the planning and scheduling of a research project. Opns. Res. 10, 115–125.
Elmaghraby, S. E. 1964. An algebra for the analysis of Generalized Activity Networks. Management Science. 10, 494–514.
Elmaghraby, S. E. 1966. On Generalized Activity Networks. The Journal of Industrial Engineering. 17, 621–631.
Elmaghraby, S. E. 1977. Activity networks: project planning and control by network models. John Wiley, New York.
Grunder, O.; P. Baptiste; And O. Barakat. 1996a. An Approach to Model and Evaluate Innovation and Concurrent Engineering Projects. Proceedings of the Euro Working Group on Project Management and Scheduling. Poznan (Poland). 94–97.
Grunder, O.; P. Baptiste; And O. Barakat. 1996b. An introduction to the Cognitive Activity Network Model. Proceedings of the Computer Integrated Manufacturing and Automation Technology. Grenoble (France). 256–261.
Moeller, G. L. 1972. Vert — A Tool to Assess Risk. Proceedings of the 23rd Conf. Amer. Inst. Indust. Engineering. 1,211–222.
Moeller, G.L.; And L. A. Digman. 1981. Operations planning with VERT. Opns. Res. 29, 676–697.
Pritsker, A. A. B.; And W. W. Happ. 1966a. GERT: Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique — Part I: Fundamentals. The Journal of Industrial Engineering. 17, 267–274.
Pritsker, A. A. B.; And G. E. Whitehouse. 1966b. GERT: Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique — Part II: Probabilistic and Industrial Engineering Applications. The Journal of Industrial Engineering. 17, 293–301.
Pritsker, A. A. B. 1979. Modeling and Analysis using Q-GERT Networks. John Wiley, New-York.
Ramat, E.; And C. Lente; And C. Tacquard. 1995. Modération et planification des projets d’innovation: le modèle RAIH. Proceedings of the 5ème congrès international de Génie Industriel. Grenoble (France). 193–198.
Ramat, E.; Et Al. 1996. The RAIH Model: application on Product Realization Process example. Proceedings of the Workshop on Production planning and control. Mons (Belgium). 178–183.
Ramat, E. 1997. Modélisation et planification de projets complexes à contraintes de ressources: le modèle RAIH. Doctoral Thesis, University of Tours (France).
Tacquard, C. 1993. Proposition d’un modele cognitif axé sur l’auto-organisation de la connaissance pour la resolution de problemes. Doctoral Thesis, University of Franche-Comté (France).
Whitehouse, G.E.; And A. A. B. Pritsker. 1969. GERT: Part III — Further Statistical Results; Counters Renewal Times, and Correlations. AIIE Transactions. 1, 45–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baptiste, P., Grunder, O. (1999). Cognitive Science and Project Scheduling: More Realistic Representation. In: Węglarz, J. (eds) Project Scheduling. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5533-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5533-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7529-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5533-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive