Skip to main content

Using Advertising to Generate Information and Signals for Product Quality: Lessons for Biotechnology Markets in Canada from Pharmaceutical Markets in the United States

  • Chapter
Biotechnology and the Consumer

Abstract

Recent innovations in biotechnology have made a number of products available to the consumer, and may provide more products in the future. Yet innovation is not enough to guarantee a product’s success. A successful product requires appropriate marketing for commercial success. A crucial part of that marketing involves advertising. Yet advertising is one of the most controversial aspects in microeconomics. This paper addresses some of the relevant issues for biotechnology by looking at the debate over pharmaceutical advertising in the United States. The experience there teaches that for biotechnology advertising to serve consumers, there needs to be appropriate laws and government regulation in place. This legal framework should include proper regulatory and litigation structures in order to seek both to discourage deception and to foster advertisements that convey valuable information.

Andrew N. Kleit is Associate Professor in the Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802-5030, USA. E-mail: ankl@psu.edu. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of Industry Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Addy, G. N. (1991). Deceptive marketing practices. In: R. S. Khemani & W. T. Stanbury (Eds.), Canadian competition law and policy at the centenary, pp. 389–414. Halifax: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales, H. P. (1994). FDA regulation of pharmaceutical advertising. Seton Hall Law Review, 24, 1370–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R., Bui, L. T., Lucking-Reiley, D. H., & Urban, G. L. (1997). The roles of marketing, product quality, and price competition in the growth and composition of the U.S. antiulcer drug industry. In: T. F. Bresnahan & R. S. Gordon (Eds.), The economics of new goods, pp. 277–328. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstatter, L. (1995) representing Ehrenthal and Associates, Direct-to-consumer promotion, Food and Drug Administration Public Hearing (October 18–19, 1995). http://www2evolvingtech.com/etc/industry/hearings/95N227contents.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. P. (1988). Direct-to-the-public advertising of prescription drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 373–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W., & Wilson, T. (1979). The effect of advertising on competition: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einsiedel, E. F. (1998). The market for credible information in biotechnology. This volume. Also in Journal of Consumer Policy, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, M. A., & Caves, R. E. (1988). Persuasion or information: Promotion and the shares of brand name and generic pharmaceuticals. Journal of Law and Economics, 31, 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. A. (1991). Some comments on direct-to-consumer advertising. In: D. S. Pathak, A. Escovitz, & S. Kucukarslan (Eds.), Promotion of pharmaceuticals: Issues, trends, options, pp. 67–74. New York: Pharmaceutical Products Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, P. M., & Mathios, A. D. (1990). Information, advertising, and health choices: A study of the cereal market. Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaserman, D. L., &. Mayo, J. W. (1995). Government and business: The economics of antitrust and regulation. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. (1995). Regulating information about aspirin and the prevention of heart attack. American Economic Review, 85(2), 96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. A., & Pines, W. L. (1990). The federal regulation of prescription drug advertising and promotion. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 2409–2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., & Leffler, K. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 615–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleit, A. N. (1993). Efficiencies without economists: The early years of resale price maintenance. Southern Journal of Economics, 59, 597–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffler, K. B. (1981). Persuasion or information? The economics of prescription drug advertising. Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labor, S. L., Schommer, J. C., & Pathak, D. S. (1995). Information overload with written prescription drug information. Drug Information Journal, 29, 1317–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A., & Rubin, P. H. (1985). Matching prescription drugs and consumers: The benefits of direct advertising. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 513–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathios, A. D., & Plummer, M. (1989). The regulation of advertising by the Federal Trade Commission: Capital market effects. Research in Law and Economics, 12, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. (1995) representing the National Women’s Health Network, Direct-to-consumer promotion, Food and Drug Administration Public Hearing (October 18–19, 1995). http://www2evolvingtech.com/etc/industry/hearings/95N227contents.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. S. (1996). Patterns in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print advertising and their public policy implications. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 15, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H. (1991). The FDA’s prescription for consumer ignorance. Journal of Regulation and Social Costs, 1(3), 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1983). Advertising and entry deterrence: An exploratory model. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 636–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffet, M. J., & Kopp, S. W. (1990). Advertising prescription drugs to the public: Headache or relief? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 9, 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. E. II (1990). The organization of industry. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (1998). Biotechnology and the media. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. G., Best, W., Egan, J. W., & Higinbotham, H. W. (1975). The theory of supply with applications to the ethical pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 449–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. G. (1989). Advertising in consumer goods industries: Durability, economies of scale, and heterogeneity. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. J., & Klein, M. S. (1992). From dog food to prescription drug advertising: Litigating false scientific establishment claims under the Lanham Act. Seton Hall Law Review, 22, 389–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R., & Hensel, P. J. (1995). Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S. (1995) representing Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, Direct-to-consumer promotion, Food and Drug Administration Public Hearing (October 18–19, 1995). http://www2evolvingtech.com/etc/industry/hearings/95N227contents.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Bartha M. Knoppers Alan D. Mathios

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kleit, A.N. (1998). Using Advertising to Generate Information and Signals for Product Quality: Lessons for Biotechnology Markets in Canada from Pharmaceutical Markets in the United States. In: Knoppers, B.M., Mathios, A.D. (eds) Biotechnology and the Consumer. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5311-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5311-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5541-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5311-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics