Advertisement

Genetic Algorithms II

Species Distribution Modelling
  • David R. B. Stockwell

Abstract

This paper describes the application of genetic algorithms, or GAs, to the problem of species distribution modelling. The first section describes the GA algorithm, and a theoretical basis for applying it to spatial predictive modelling. The stages of analysis of a particular GA application follows. The Genetic Algorithm for Rule-set Production, or GARP, is described: including preparation of the base data, species location data, development of a set of models using GARP algorithm, verification and prediction. The final section contains two applications with ecological interpretations. The first is the prediction and explanation of the abundance of the Greater Glider Petauroides volons in Waratah Creek, Australia. The second is the prediction of the distribution of the Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea through climate modelling in the continental United States.

Key words

climate GARP GIS Greater Glider museum data Cerulean Warbler 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, M. P., Nicholls, A. O. and Margules, C. R. 1990. Measurement of the Realized Qualitative Niche: Environmental Niches of Five Eucalyptus Species, Ecological Monographs, 60: 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bermingham, E., Rohwer, S., Freeman, S. and Wood, C. 1992. Vicariance biogeography in the Pleistocene and speciation in North American wood warblers: a test of Mengel’s model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89: 6624–6628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, L. W. 1984. On identifying important habitat characteristics and planning conservation strategy for arboreal marsupials within the Eden Woodpulp Concession area. pp 501–508 in A. P. Smith and I. P. Hume (editors) Possums and Gliders, Australian Mammal Society and Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney.Google Scholar
  4. Busby, J. R. 1991. BIOCLIM — A bioclimatic analysis and prediction system, pp. 64–68 in C. R. Margules and M. P. Austin (editors) Biological conservation: cost effective biological surveys and analysis. CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Curson, J., Quinn, D. and Beadle, D. 1994. Warblers of The Americas. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Cheeseman, P. 1990. On finding the most probable model, pp. 73–96 in J. Shrager and P. Langley (editors), Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: aufmann.Google Scholar
  7. Daly, C, Taylor, G. and Gibson, W. 1997. The PRISM Approach to Mapping Precipitation and Temperature, 10th Conference on Applied Climatology, Reno, NV, American Meteorological Society, 10–12.Google Scholar
  8. Davey, S. M. 1989. The environmental relationships of arboreal marsupials in a eucalypt forest: a basis for Australian forest wildlife management. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Forestry, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, J. and Garrett, K. 1997. A Field Guide to the Warblers of North America. Houghton Mifflin: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Grefenstette J. J. 1984. GENESIS: a system for using genetic search procedures, Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Systems and Machines, Rochester MI, 161–165.Google Scholar
  11. Holland, J. H, Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. and Thagard, P. R. 1986. Induction: processes of inference, learning and discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Kavenaugh, R. P. 1987. Floristic and phenological characteristics of a eucalyptus forest in relation to its use by arboreal marsupials. Unpublished M.Sc Thesis, Department of Forestry, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Mendenhall, W., Scheaffer, R. L. and Wackerly, D. D. 1981. Mathematical Statistics with Applications. Wadsworth Inc., Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, D. M., Lees, B. G. and Davey, S. M. 1991. A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system, Environmental Management, 15: 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nix, H. A. 1986. A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid snakes, pp. 4–15 in R. Longmore (ed.) Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia. Australian Flora and Fauna Series Number 7. Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., Gough, G., Thomas, I. and Peterjohn, B. G. 1997. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.3. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.Google Scholar
  17. Stockwell, D. R. B. 1992. Machine learning and the problem of prediction and explanation in ecological modelling. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Australian National University, Australia.Google Scholar
  18. Stockwell, D. R. B. 1993. LBS: Bayesian learning system for rapid expert system development. Expert Systems with Applications. 6:137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stockwell, D. R. B., Davey S.M., Davis J. R. and Noble, I. R. 1990. Using inductions of decision trees to predict greater glider density, AI Applications in Natural Resource Management, 4: 33–43.Google Scholar
  20. Stockwell, D. R. B. and Noble, I. R. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 32:249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. B. Stockwell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations