Advertisement

Formalizing Association Semantics In Terminologies

  • Harold Solbrig
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 523)

Abstract

The terminology of a scientific or technical community embodies an information structure that is meaningful to that community. The conceptual model underlying a terminology can serve as the basis for an information model, as well as providing a foundation upon which the external and internal information structures can be built. In order to be useful, however, the information content behind a terminology must be formalized - made precise and explicit. One of the roadblocks to this formalization process is the issue of association semantics. Different terminologies specify associations from different perspectives and at varying degrees of specificity. These associations need to be mapped into a common model that is useful to both the terminologist and the information modeler.

Keywords

Mental Image Conceptual Space Technical Community Object Management Group Association Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [F94]
    Edward Finegan, Language-its structure and use. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX. 1994 (Second Edition)Google Scholar
  2. [ICD97]
    The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [ISO87]
    ISO/TC 97, Information processing systems-Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base. (ISO/TR 9007: 1987 (E))Google Scholar
  4. [KR94]
    Haim Kilov, James Ross, Information Modeling: An Object-Oriented Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [K99]
    Haim Kilov. Private correspondence with the author.Google Scholar
  6. [L87]
    George Lakoff, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1987.Google Scholar
  7. [M97]
    Bertrand Meyer, Object-Oriented Software Construction. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [MESH87]
    Medical Subject Headings-Tree Structures, 1988. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. [OMG97]
    Object Management Group, CORBAmed Lexicon Query Services RFP. January 1997.Google Scholar
  10. [OMG98]
    Object Management Group, Lexicon Query Services. April, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. [094]
    James J. Odell, “Six Different Kinds of Composition“, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, SIG Publications, Inc. New York, NY, Vol 5, No 8, January 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [OR23]
    C.K. Ogden, LA. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, New York, NY, 1923. (reprint)Google Scholar
  13. [S90]
    Juan C. Sager, A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. [S84]
    John F. Sowa, Conceptual Structures-Information Processing in Mind and Machine.Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [SMD97]
    SNOMED-The Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine, College of American Pathologists, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. [SMD98]
    SNOMED-RT-A Reference Terminology for Healthcare, College of American Pathologists, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. [WCH87]
    Morton E. Winston, Roger Chaffin and Douglas Herrmann, “A Taxonomy of Part Whole Relations” Cognitive Science, 11, 1987, pp. 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold Solbrig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations