Skip to main content

Regulatory Science: Risk and Decisions

  • Chapter
Risk-Based Environmental Decisions

Abstract

Regulatory decisions usually are made in the face of considerable uncertainty and debate. Predictions of risk are uncertain. Stakeholder groups come to the debate with different estimates of the risk. There are differences of opinion as to the goals of regulation, how uncertainty is to be incorporated into decisions, or how non-health goals (such as cost) are to be reflected in the choice of policy. While some of these issues require methods and facts mastered by technical experts, many are matters of societal judgment requiring insights into politics, law, ethics, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. EPA, Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC) Final Report, Volume I, Office of Pesticides, Washington, DC, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  2. EPA, Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, 51 Federal Register, 33992, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EPA, Carcinogenicity Guidelines, 61 Federal Register 17960, 1996. A. Jarabek, M. Menache, J. Overton, M. Dourson and F. Miller, “The US Environmental Protection Agency’s Inhalation RfD Methodology: A Risk Assessment for Air Toxics”, Toxicology and Industrial Health, 6, 279, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Baird, J. Cohen, and J. Graham, J., “Non-Cancer Risk Assessment: A Probabilistic Alternative to Current Practice”, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2, 79, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Swartout, S. Price, and M. Dourson, M. Dourson, “A Probabilistic Framework for the Reference Dose (Probabilistic RID)”, Risk Analysis, 18, 271, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. EPA, Draft Water Quality Criteria Methodology Revisions: Human Health; Federal Register, 43755, August 14, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  7. EPA, Guidelines for Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment, 56 Federal Register 63798, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Research Council, Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. en banc decision, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. EPA, 824, F 2nd 1146, DC Circuit, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minn, 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawford-Brown, D.J. (1999). Regulatory Science: Risk and Decisions. In: Risk-Based Environmental Decisions. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5227-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5227-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7382-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5227-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics