Advertisement

Evolution, Community, and The Global Economy

Chapter

Abstract

The world economy at the end of the twentieth century is characterized by increasing cross-border awareness and interdependence among nations. Both international trade and investment have had manifold increases. Total world trade increased from $629 billion (in 1995 dollars) in 1960 by eight times to $5 trillion by 1995 (world output grew only by 3.6 times) (U.S. Economic Report of the President, 1997, p. 243). Total world foreign direct investment went up from $48 billion in 1981 to $204 billion in 1994 (17United Nations, 1994). Small firms at the end of the century show an increasing degree of importance. Their share of sales, value-added, and employment went up in the European Union era, and smaller firms in the 1990s increased their share in exports and in outward foreign direct investment in the OECD countries and in many Asian countries (14OECD, 1996).

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Small Firm Large Firm Radical Innovation Multinational Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Zoltan, Randall Morck, Myles Shaver, and Bernard Yeung. (1997). “Small and Medium-Size Enterprises in the Global Economy.” Small Business Economics, 9(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken, Brian, Gordon H. Hanson, and Ann E. Harrison. (1997). “Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behavior.” Journal of International Economics, 43(1-2), 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, Paul, and Bruce Kogut. (1997). “The Exploration of Technological Diversity and Geographic Localization in Start-up Firms in the Semiconductor Industry.” Small Business Economy, 9(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, Martin, and Hans Gersbach. (1995). “Efficiency in Manufacturing and the Need for Global Competition.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 307–347.Google Scholar
  5. Dunning, John H. (1995). “Reconfiguring the Boundaries of International Business Activities.” Paper presented at the Conference on Euro-Pacific Investment and Trade, Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
  6. Economic Report of the President. (1997). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  7. Gomes-Casseres, Benjamin. (1997). “Alliance Strategies of Small Firms.” Small Business Economics, 9(1), 33–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, David, Randall Morck, Joel Slemrod, and Bernard Yeung. (1993).“Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations.” In Alberto Giovinnini, Glen Hubbard, and Joel Slemrod (eds.), Studies in International Taxation Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kirzner, Isreal M. (1997). “Enterpreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach.” Journal of Economics Literature, 35(1)(March), 60–85.Google Scholar
  10. Kohn, Tomas O. (1997). “Small Firms as International Players.” Small Business Economics, 9(1), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morck, Randall, and Bernard Yeung. (1991). “Why Investors Value Multinationality.” Journal of Business, 64(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morck, Randall, and Bernard Yeung. (1992). “Internalization: An Event Study Test.” Journal of International Economics, 33, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morck, Randall, and Bernard Yeung. (1995). “The Corporate Governance of Multinationals.” In Ronald Daniels and Randall Morck (eds.), Corporate Decision-Making in Canada. Calgary, Alberta: Industry Canada Research Series, University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (1996). SMEs Employment, Innovation, and Growth: The Washington Workshop. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Stigler, George. (1951). “The Division of Labor Is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” Journal of Political Economy, 59(June), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Williamson, Oliver. (1991). “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structure Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. United Nations. (1994). World Investment Report. Geneva S.WGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U. S. Burean of the CensusUniversity of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations