Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated the quantitative importance of entry, exit, growth, and decline in the industrial population (see 4Baldwin, 1995). This turnover rewards innovative activity and contributes to productivity growth. Entry is not the only process that causes turnover in the firm population. Growth and decline also occur in the incumbent population. But entry and exit make a significant contribution to the total amount of turnover that takes place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernathy, W.J., and J.M. Utterbach. (1978). “Patterns of Industrial Innovation” Technology Review, 80 (June-July), 41–47.
Audretsch, D.B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, J.R. (1995). The Dynamics of Industrial Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, J.R. (1996). “Productivity Growth, Plant Turnover and Restructuring in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector.” In D. Mayes (ed.). Sources of Productivity Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, J.R. (1997). Innovation and Intellectual Property. Catalogue No. 88-515. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Baldwin, J.R. (1998a). Are There High-Tech Industries or Only High-Tech Firms? Research Paper No. 120 Analytical Studies Branch. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Baldwin, J.R. (1998b). Entry and Exit. Research Paper No. 121. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Baldwin, J.R., W. Chandler, C. Le, and T. Papailiadis. (1994). Strategies for Success: A Profile of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Canada. Catalogue No. 61-523 R. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Baldwin, J.R., T. Dunne, and J. Haltiwanger. (1995). “Plant Turnover in Canada and the United States.” In J. Baldwin (ed.), The Dynamic of Industrial Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, J.R., and G. Gellatly. (1998). “Developing High-Tech Classification Schemes: A Firm-Based Approach.” Proceedings of the sixth Annual International Conference at the University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Baldwin, J.R., T. Gray, and J. Johnson. (1996). “Advanced Technology Use andTraining in Canadian Manufacturing.” Canadian Business Economics, 5(1), 51–70.
Baldwin, J.R., T. Gray, J. Johnson, J. Proctor, M, Rafiquzzaman, and D. Sabourin. (1997). Failing Concerns: Business Bankruptcy in Canada. Catalogue No. 61-525. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Baldwin, J.R., and J. Johnson. (1996a). “Business Strategies in More — and Less-Innovative Firms in Canada.” Research Policy, 25, 785–804.
Baldwin, J.R., and J. Johnson. (1996b). “Human Capital Development and Innovation: A Sectoral Analysis,” In Peter Howitt (ed.), The Implications of Knowledge-Based Growth for Micro-Economic Policies. Calgary: Calgary University Press.
Baldwin, J.R., and J. Johnson. (1998). “Innovator Typologies, Related Competencies and Performance.” In G. Eliasson and C. Green (eds.), Microfoundations of Economic Growth. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Baldwin, J.R., and M. Rafiquzzaman. (1995). “Selection Versus Evolutionary Adaption: Learning and Postentry Performance.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 501–522.
Baldwin, J.R., and D. Sabourin. (1996). Technology Adoption in Canadian Manufacturing, Catalogue number 88-514XPE, Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
D’Amboise, G. (1991). The Canadian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise: Situations and Challenges. Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Dunne, T., M. Roberts, and L. Samuelson. (1988). “Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.” Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 495–515.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geroski, P.A. (1991). Market Dynamics and Entry. Basil Blackwell.
Gort, M., and S. Klepper. (1982). “Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations.” Economic Journal, 92, 630–653.
Haltiwanger. J. (1998). “Measuring and Analyzing Aggregate Fluctuations: The Importance of Building from Micro-Economic Evidence.” St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Economic Review. 79(3), 55–77.
Hollander, S. (1965). The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Dupont Rayon Plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Picot, G., J.R. Baldwin, and R. Dupuy. (1994). “Employment Generation by Small Producers in the Job-Turnover Process.” Canadian Economic Observer (pp. 3.1–3.18). Catalogue 11-010. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada. (1996). The Survey of Operating and Financial Practices of Entrants. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldwin, J.R., Johnson, J. (1999). Entry, Innovation and Firm Growth. In: Acs, Z.J. (eds) Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7356-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5173-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive