Skip to main content

Semiconductor Startups and The Exploration of New Technological Territory

  • Chapter
Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact

Abstract

Why are small firms important? The answer to this question often points to the critical role played by small firms in innovation. Research conducted by small firms has, after all, been shown to be more productive than that conducted by larger firms (Bound, Cummins, Griliches, Hall, and Jaffe, 1984). For instance, Acs and Audretsch (1990) find that small firms produce innovations with twice the productivity of larger firms. However, this superiority of small firms in research productivity has not been supported universally. The higher productivity of small-firm research is evident only in some industries and is more conclusive for the United States than for other countries (Scherer, 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Zoltan, and David Audretsch. (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Robert. (1983). “Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Paul. (1996a). “The Geographic Localization of Technological Knowledge in the International Semiconductor Industry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Paul, (1996b). “Knowledge Sourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry.” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Paul, and Bruce Kogut. (1997). “The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation.” Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Paul, and Lori Rosenkopf. (1997).“Interfirm Knowledge Building by Semiconductor Startups: The Role of Alliances and Mobility.” Working Paper, Huntsman Center for Global Competition and Innovation, Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J.C., C. Cummins, Z. Griliches, B.H. Hall, and A. Jaffe. (1984). “Who Does R & D and Who Patents.” In Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D: Patents and Productivity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Ernest, and Stuart MacDonald. (1982). Revolution in Miniature (2nd ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W, and S. Klepper. (1996). “The Trade-off Between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress.” Small Business Economics, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wes, and Richard Levin. (1989). “Innovation and Market Structure.” In Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dataquest. (1990). A Decade of Semiconductor Start-ups. San Jose, CA: Dataquest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., and C.B. Schoonhoven. (1990). “Organizational Growth: Founding Teams Strategy and Environment and Growth Among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures 1978-1988.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Maryann. (1994).“Knowledge Complimentarity and Innovation.” Small Business Economics, 6(5), 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael, and John Freeman. (1984). “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (1993). “Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics, 24(2), 248–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrigel Gary. (1993). “Large Firms, Small Firms, and the Governance of Flexible Specialization: The Case of Baden Wurtemberg and Socialized Risk.” In Bruce Kogut (ed.). Country Competitiveness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. (1993). “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J., D. Sawers, and R. Stillerman. (1958). The Sources of Invention. London: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce, and Dong-Jae Kim. (1996). “Diversification and Platform Technologies.” Organization Science, 7(3), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Gordon E. (1986).“Entrepreneurship and Innovation:The Electronics Industry.” The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, Bart. (1994). “Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence.” Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., and C., Sabel. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett. (1982). “Information Exchange and Technological Innovation.” In D. Sahal (ed.), The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge (pp. 105–123). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett, and Judith Larson. (1984). Silicon Valley Fever. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1989). “Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change.” Small Business Economics, 1, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. (1991). “The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley.” Research Policy, 20, 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. (1994). Regional Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., and D. Ross. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T., and J. Podolny. (1996). “Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almeida, P. (1999). Semiconductor Startups and The Exploration of New Technological Territory. In: Acs, Z.J. (eds) Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7356-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5173-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics