Skip to main content

Unit-Root Tests and Excess Returns

  • Chapter
  • 469 Accesses

Part of the Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance book series (DMEF,volume 1)

Abstract

When introducing students to the modem theory of financial markets, it is common to characterize the behavior of the log of asset prices as martingales, and their excess returns as being serially uncorrelated or even unpredictable. This is consistent with Fama’s (1970) characterization of weak, semi-strong, and strong market efficiency. To be sure, there is an extensive literature documenting the deviations of asset prices from this characterization. Despite this, most would accept the proposition that asset prices contain a unit root in their time-series representation and that excess returns do not. Put another way, the stylized fact is that asset prices are integrated of order one (I(1)) and excess returns are integrated of order zero (I(0)). However, a small number of prominent recent papers have presented evidence that appears to reject this characterization in a surprising way. They show that, according to some tests, some excess returns appear to contain a unit root.

Keywords

  • Unit Root
  • Excess Return
  • Cointegration Test
  • Forward Rate
  • Spot Rate

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4_5
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4615-5129-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baillie, R. T. and T. Bollerslev (1989). “Common Stochastic Trends in a System of Exchange Rates,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 44, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, R. T. and T. Bollerslev (1994). “The Long Memory of the Forward Premium,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 13, 565–571.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G. and R. J. Hodrick (1993). “On Biases in the Measurement of Foreign Exchange Risk Premiums,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 12, 115–138.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, R. J. and K. F. Kroner (1995). “Arbitrage, Cointegration and Testing the Unbiasedness Hypothesis in Financial Markets,” Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 30, 23–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and P. Perron (1991). “Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know About Unit Roots,” in O. Blanchard and S. Fischer (eds.) NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. W. and K. S. Lai (1993). “Finite-Sample Sizes of Johansen’s Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 55, 313–328.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. H. (1991). “A Critique of the Application of Unit Root Tests,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15, 275–284.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, W. J. (1994). “Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency and Common Stochastic Trends,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 13, 551–564.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. (1989). “Output Persistence, Economic Structure and the Choice of Stabilization Policy,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 69–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edison, H. J., E. Gagnon, and W. R. Melick (1994). “Understanding the Empirical Literature on Purchasing Power Parity: the Post-Bretton Woods Era,” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Papers No. 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987). “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. D. and K. Lewis (1992). “Trends in Excess Returns in Currency and Bond Markets,” NBER working paper No. 4116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. D. and K. Lewis (1993). “Trends in Excess Returns in Currency and Bond Markets,” European Economic Review, 37, 1005–1019.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. D. and K. Lewis (1994). “Do Stationary Risk Premia Explain it All? Evidence from the Term Structure,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 3, 285–318.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. D. and K. Lewis (1995). “Do Long-Term Swings in the Dollar Affect Estimates of the Risk Premia?” Review of Financial Studies, 8, 709–742.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1970). “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,” Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Godbout, M. and S. van Norden (1997). “Reconsidering Cointegration in International Finance: Three Case Studies of Size Distortion in Finite Samples,” working paper No. 97-1, Bank of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo, J. (1994). “A Comparison of Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long Run Equilibrium Relationships,” Journal of Econometrics, 60, 203–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo, J. and T. Lee (1998). “Pitfalls in Testing for Long Run Relationships,” Journal of Econometrics, 86, 129–154.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo, J. and J. Pitarakis (1994). “Comovements in Large Systems,” discussion paper No. 9465, CORE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (1994). “Testing for Cointegrating in Linear Quadratic Models,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, S. (1995). “Long-Run Demand for Ml,” working paper No. 95-11, Bank of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M. S. and B. E. SØrenson (1996). “Finding Cointegration Rank in High Dimensional Systems Using the Johansen Test: An Illustration Using Data Based Monte Carlo Simulations,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 726–732.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, S. (1988). “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meese, R. A. and K. Rogoff (1983). “Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies: Do They Fit Out of Sample?” Journal of International Economics, 14, 3–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K. and K. D. West (1987). “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix,” Econometrica, 55, 703–708.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). “A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461–472.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., J. McFarland, and P. C. McMahon (1996). “Robust Tests of Forward Exchange Market Efficiency with Empirical Evidence from the 1920s,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 1–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel, G. C. and S. H. Ahn (1988). “Asymptotic Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio Test for Cointegration in the Nonstationary Vector AR Case,” technical report, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel, G. C. and S. H. Ahn (1992). “Vector Autoregressive Models with Unit Roots and Reduced Rank Structure; Estimation, Likelihood Ratio Tests, and Forecasting,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 13, 353–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson (1993). “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems,” Econometrica, 61, 783–820.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, H. Y. (1994). “Finite Sample Properties of Likelihood Ratio Tests for Integration When Linear Trends are Present,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 66–79.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, H. Y. (1995). “Finite Sample Performance of Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegrating Ranks in Vector Autoregressions,” Econometric Theory, 11, 1015–1032.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. W. (1995). “Vector Autoregressions and Cointegration,” in Engle, R.F. and D. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Godbout, MJ., van Norden, S. (1999). Unit-Root Tests and Excess Returns. In: Rothman, P. (eds) Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Economic and Financial Data. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7334-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5129-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive