Advertisement

Coding vs. Spreading Over Block Fading Channels

  • Ezio Biglieri
  • Giuseppe Caire
  • Giorgio Taricco
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 487)

Abstract

In this chapter we study the optimum tradeoff of coding vs. spreading in a single-cell CDMA mobile communication system with block-fading, block-synchronous (but symbol-asynchronous) transmission, and slow power control. The optimization criterion we choose is based on system capacity, as measured in users/cell×bit/s/Hz,

We adopt an information-theoretic definition of outage: this is the event that the mutual information experienced by a user code word falls below the actual user code rate. The system capacity is then defined as above under decoding-delay and outage-probability constraints. We examine the conventional single-user receiver and a linear MMSE multiuser receiver. Our results show that, with ideal power control and optimum coding/spreading tradeoff, capacities close to 1 user/cell×bit/s/Hz are achievable by the conventional receiver, while the capacity gain offered by MMSE multiuser detection is moderate. With non-ideal power control MMSE multiuser detection is more attractive: in fact, it proves to be very robust to residual power-control errors, while conventional detection suffers from a large capacity degradation.

Keywords

Mutual Information Fading Channel Power Control Code Rate System Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Alard and R. Lassalle, “Principles of modulation and channel coding for digital broadcasting for mobile receivers,” European Broadcasting Union Review, No. 224, Aug. 1987.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Benedetto and E. Biglieri, Principles of Digital Transmission with Wireless Applications. New York: Plenum, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Cover and J. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1991.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Gilhousen, I. Jacobs, R. Padovani, A. Viterbi, L. Weaver and C. Wheatly III, “On the capacity of a cellular CDMA system,” IEEE Trans. on Vehic. Tech., Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 303–312, May 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    U. Grenander and G. Szegö, Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications. New York: Chelsea, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Honig, U. Madhow and S. Verdu, “Blind adaptive multiuser detection,” IEEE Trans. on Inform. Theory, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 944–960, July 1995.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Kaplan and S. Shamai (Shitz), “Error probabilities for the block-fading Gaussian channel,” A.E.Ü., Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 192–205, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Knopp, Coding and Multiple Access over Fading Channels, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Knopp, P. A. Humblet, “Maximizing Diversity on Block Fading Channels,” Proceedings of ICC’ 97, Montréal, Canada, 8–12 June, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. Ozarow, S. Shamai, and A. D. Wyner, “Information theoretic considerations for cellular mobile radio,” IEEE Trans. on Vehic. Tech., Vol. 43, No. 2, May 1994.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Pottie and R. Calderbank, “Channel coding strategies for cellular mobile radio,” IEEE Trans. on Vehic. Tech., Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 763–769, Nov. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Proakis, Digital Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Rappaport, Wireless Communications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Salz, “Digital transmission over cross-coupled linear channels,” AT&T Tech. J., Vol. 64, no. 6, July-Aug. 1985.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Tse and S. Hanly, “Linear Multiuser Receivers: Effective Interference, Effective Bandwidth and Capacity” Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M98/1, UC Berkeley, Jan. 1998. Also: submitted for publication to IEEE Trans. on Inform. Theory.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. Verdú, “The capacity region of the symbol-asynchronous Gaussian multiple-access channel,” IEEE Trans. on Inform. Theory, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 733–751, July 1989.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. J. Viterbi, CDMA — Principles of Spread-Spectrum Communications, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    COST 207 Management Committee, COST 207: Digital land mobile radio communications (Final Report). Commission of the European Communities, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ezio Biglieri
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Caire
    • 1
  • Giorgio Taricco
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ElettronicaPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations