Survey of Research Issues In LEO/MEO Based Global Mobile Communication Systems
On May 5, 1997 a Delta II rocket carried the first Iridium satellites into orbit, by mid-November 1997 thirty-nine satellites were in orbit. It is expected that during 1998, Iridium will become fully operational and available for public use. LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and MEO (Medium Earth Orbit) satellite based communication systems will provide, in the coming decade, widespread wireless communication services from any place to any place on Earth. Among their cited advantages is the fact that they transcend the boundaries imposed by local, state and regional governing bodies. LEO/MEO have the potential of providing instant communication services to regions lacking of telecommunication infrastructure. They support wireless communication from and to areas not covered by cellular or geostationary phone systems. They make it economically viable to provide mobile communication services to areas with low population density, or to areas with low demand for wireless communications. LEO/MEO based communication systems will offer and support a wide range of services including: voice based communications, paging services, one and two way messaging, data communications, video and multimedia services, broadcasting, positioning, monitoring and data collection, narrowband and wideband broadcasting and communication services.
KeywordsBurning Income Expense Resid Dial
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adams, W.S. and L. Rider. (1987). Circular Polar Constellations Providing Continuous Single or Multiple Coverage Above a Specified Latitude. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 35(2):111–117.Google Scholar
- Arnon, S. and N.S. Kopeika. (1997a). Free Space Optical Communication Satellite Networks — Vibaration Effects and Possible Solutions. In Advancement of Photonics for Space, SPIE Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Gavish, B. (1995a). Low Earth Orbit Satellite Based Communication Systems — Some Research Issues. In Proceedings of EURO XIV, Jerusalem, pages 15–20.Google Scholar
- Gavish, B. (1997a). LEO/MEO Systems — Global Mobile Communication Systems. To appear in Telecommunication Systems.Google Scholar
- Gavish, B. and I Kalvenes. (1995). LEOS — Optimal Satellite Launch Policies: The Dynamic Case. To appear in Operations Research.Google Scholar
- Gavish, B. and J. Kalvenes. (1997a). The Impact of Intersatellite Communication Links on LEOS Performance. To appear in Telecommunication Systems.Google Scholar
- Gavish, B. and J. Kalvenes. (1997b). The Impact of Satellite Altitude on the Performance of LEOS Based Communication Systems. To appear in Wireless Networks.Google Scholar
- Markowic, Z. and W. Hope. (1992). Small, Low Earth Orbit Communication Satellites — An Evaluation. In IREECON ′92. Australia’s Electronics Convention Proceedings, Vol. 1, pages 178–181 IREE, Edgecliff, NSW.Google Scholar
- Perrotta, G. (1991). A Comparison between Low Circular and Elliptical Inclined Orbits for Small Satellites Communication Applications. In Proceedings Second European Conference on Satellite Communications, Vol. ESA SP-322, ESA, Liège, Belgium, pages 431–434.Google Scholar
- Rider, L. (1985). Optimized Polar Orbit Constellations for Redundant Earth Coverage. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 33(2):147–161.Google Scholar
- Rider, L. (1986). Analytic Design of Satellite Constellations for Zonal Coverage using Inclined Circular Orbits. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 4(1):31–64.Google Scholar
- Sheriff, R.E. and J.G. Gardiner. (1993). The Applicability of LEO Satellites to 3rd Generation Networks. In Fourth IEE Conference on Telecommunications, IEE, London, pages 296–300. Conf. Publ. No. 371.Google Scholar