Least-Squares and Minimum Norm Problems

  • A. Monticelli
Part of the Power Electronics and Power Systems book series (PEPS)

Abstract

In this chapter, the solution and solvability conditions of over- and underdetermined systems of linear equations (Ax = b) and their application to circuit analysis problems are discussed. The related concepts of observability and controllability are reviewed. Nonlinear overdetermined system are also discussed.

Keywords

Covariance Resis Estima 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clements, K.A. and Wollenberg, B.F., “An algorithm for observability determination in power system state estimation”, paper A75 447-3, IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, San Francisco, CA, July 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Dahlquist, G. and Björck, Å, Numerical Methods, Prentice Hall Series in Automatic Computation, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Krumpholz, G.R., Clements, K.A., and Davis, P.W., “Power system observability: A practical algorithm using network topology”, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., Vol. 99, pp. 1534-1542, July/Aug. 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Duff, I.F. and Erisman, A.M., Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C., Matrix Computations, 2nd Edition, John Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Hachtel, G.D., “The sparse tableau approach to finite element assembly”, Sparse Matrix Computations, pp. 349–363, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Monticelli, A., Wu, F.F., “Network observability: Identification of observable islands and measurement placement”, IEEE Transactions Power App. Syst., Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 1035–1041, May 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Monticelli, A. and Wu, F.F., “Network observability: Theory”, IEEE Trans. Power App. Systems, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 1042–1048, May 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monticelli, A. and Liu, W.E., “Adaptive movement penalty method for the Newton optimal power flow”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 334–343, Feb. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schweppe, F.C., Wildes, J., and Rom, D., “Power system static state estimation: Parts I, II, and III”, Power Industry Computer Conference, PICA, Denver, Colorado, June 1969.Google Scholar
  11. Stott, B. and Robson, E., “Power system security control calculations using linear programming, Parts I and II”, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., Vol. 3, pp. 676–683, May 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tinney, W.F., Bright, J.M., Demaree, K.D., and Hugues, B.A., “Some deficiencies in optimal power flow”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 3, pp. 676–683, May 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Amerongen, R.A.M., “On convergence analysis and convergence enhancement of power-system least-squares state estimators”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 2038–2044, Nov. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watkins, D.S., Fundamentals of Matrix Computations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Monticelli
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Campinas, UnicampBrazil

Personalised recommendations