Technological Advances in Recovery Methods and Efficient Allocation of a Nonrenewable Resource

  • John Rowse
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 18)


Most economists would likely agree that technological progress is central to the efficient use of a nonrenewable resource over the long term. Yet advances in petroluem recovery technologies since the mid-1970s suggest that technological progress may also be important over a time span as short as two decades. This paper examines the consequences of underestimating technological advances in recovering natural gas for the Canadian province of British Columbia using a computational model maximizing conventionally-defined social welfare. Mistakes in allocating gas over time due to understimating yield relatively small welfare losses, a result that likely generalizes to other resources.


Cost Function Technological Change Technological Progress Consumer Surplus Domestic Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chao, H., 1981, Exhaustible resource models: The value of information, Operations Research 29, 903–23.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chermak, J. and R. Patrick, 1995, Technological advancement and the recovery of natural gas: The value of information, Energy Journal 16,113–135.Google Scholar
  3. Dasgupta, P., 1993, Natural resources in an age of substitutability, Chapter 25 of Kneese and Sweeney (1993).Google Scholar
  4. Farzin, Y., 1995, Technological change and the dynamics of resource scarcity measures, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 105–120.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalisch, R. and C. McGill, 1990, Changes in natural gas recovery technology and their implications, American Gas Association Gas Energy Review 18, 2–8.Google Scholar
  6. Kneese, A. and J. Sweeney (eds.), 1993, Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Volume III, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Lohrenz, J., 1991, Horizontal oil and gas wells: the engineering and economic nexus, Energy Journal 12, 35–53.Google Scholar
  8. National Energy Board, 1991, Canadian energy: Supply and demand 1990–2010 (Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ont.).Google Scholar
  9. National Energy Board, 1993, Natural gas market assessment: Canadian natural gas market mechanisms — recent experiences and developments (Supply and Services Canada, Calgary, Alta.).Google Scholar
  10. Norquist, S., 1993, Optimal r&d for nonrenewable resources: The case of cost reducing technology, Natural Resource Modeling 7, 219–243.Google Scholar
  11. Rogner, H.-H., 1988, Technology and the prospects for natural gas: Results of current gas studies, Energy Policy 16, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenberg, N., 1994, Exploring the black box: Technology, economics, and history, (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rowse, J., 1986, Measuring the user costs of exhaustible resource consumption, Resources and Energy 8, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rowse, J., 1990, Discount rate choice and efficiency in exhaustible resource allocation, Canadian Journal of Economics 23, 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rowse, J., 1996, On ad valorem taxation of nonrenewable resource production, Unpublished working paper, Department of Economics, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  16. Sweeney, J., 1984, The response of energy demand to higher prices: What have we learned? American Economic Review 74, 31–37.Google Scholar
  17. Sweeney, J., 1993, Economic theory of depletable resources: An introduction, Chapter 17 of Kneese and Sweeney (1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Rowse
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations