Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Urban and Regional Economics ((UREC,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter investigates the effects of the parameters on the characteristics of the urban equilibrium allocation. As we noted in section 2.3, there are in principle 3 × 2 city types ((renter, mixed, owner city) × (open, closed city)). To avoid some conceptual problems in defining land ownership when there is migration, we restrict the analysis to the four types shown in table 3.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • M. Adler, 1987, The Location of Owners and Renters in the City. Journal of Urban Economics 21, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Arnott, D. Pines and E. Sadka, 1986, The Effects of Equiproportional Transport Improvement in a Closed Monocentric City. Regional Science and Urban Economics 16, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Ashenfelter, 1976, On the Interpretation of Urban Density Functions. Journal of Urban Economics 3, 82–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.J.L. Berry, J.W. Simmons and R.J. Tennant, 1963, Urban Population Densities: Structure and Change. Geographical Review 53, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Bogue, 1953, Population Growth in Standard Metropolitan Areas. Housing and Home Finance Agency, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Casetti, 1971, Equilibrium Values and Population Densities in an Urban Setting. Economic Geography 47, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Clark, 1951, Urban Population Densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 114(Series A), 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Clark, 1967, Population Growth and Land Use. St Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Davis, 1965, The Urbanization of Human Populations. Scientific American 213, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Dixit, 1973, The Optimum Factory Town. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Edmonston, 1975, Population Distribution in American Cities. Heath and Company, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Glickman, 1979, The Growth and Management of the Japanese Urban System. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Goldberg and J. Mercer, 1986, The Myth of the North American City. The University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.K. Ingram and A. Carroll, 1981, The Spatial Structure of Latin American Cities. Journal of Urban Economics 9, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills, 1972, Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills and K. Ohta, 1976, Urbanization and Urban Problems. In H. Patrick and H. Rosovsky (eds) Asia’s New Giant: How the Japanese Economy Works. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C, 673–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills and J.P. Tan, 1980, A Comparison of Urban Population Density Functions in Developed and Developing Countries. Urban Studies 17, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Muth, 1969, Cities and Housing. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Oron, D. Pines and E. Sheshinski, 1973, Optimum Versus Equilibrium Land Use Pattern and Congestion Toll. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 619–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Papageorgiou, 1971, The Population Density and Rent Distribution Models Within a Multicentre Framework. Environment and Planning 3, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Papageorgiou and D. Pines, 1989, The Exponential Density Function: First Principles, Comparative Statics and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Urban Economics 26, 264–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Pines, 1972, The Equilibrium Utility Level and City Size: A Comment. Economic Geography 48, 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Pines and E. Sadka, 1986, A Comparative Statics Analysis of a Fully Closed City. Journal of Urban Economics 20, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Solow, 1972, Congestion, Density, and the Use of Land in Transporta tion. The Swedish Journal of Economics 74, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Solow, 1973, Congestion Cost and the Use of Land for Streets. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 602–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Wheaton, 1974, A Comparative Statics Analysis of Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Theory 9, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Wheaton, 1979, Monocentric Models of Urban Land Use: Contributions and Criticisms. In P. Mieszkowski and M. Straszheim (eds) Current Issues in Urban Economics. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. White, 1977, A Further Note on Density Functions and Average Distance from the Center. Journal of Urban Economics 4, 218–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papageorgiou, Y.Y., Pines, D. (1999). Comparative Statics. In: An Essay on Urban Economic Theory. Advances in Urban and Regional Economics, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4947-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4947-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7245-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4947-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics