Advertisement

The Sensitivity of Cells and Tissues to Exogenous Fields: Dependence Upon Target System Initial State

  • David J. Muehsam
  • Arthur A. Pilla

Abstract

Reports of biological windows in the responses of cells and tissues to exogenous environmental and therapeutic electromagnetic fields (EMF), suggest the electrical impedance of the target plays an important role in EMF sensitivity1,2. Biological windows have been reported at the cellular and animal level3-9. In addition, specialized waveforms such as inductively coupled pulsed EMF (PEMF) signals for recalcitrant fracture repair10 and pulsed radio frequency (PRF) signals for soft tissue repair, edema reduction and wound healing11 suggest windowing. The clinical significance of windowing phenomena is evidenced by the fact that only repairing bone, and not the surrounding normal bone has a physiologically relevant response to PEMF and that waveform parameters play a critical role in the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic EMF signals12. Although exact transduction pathways are unclear, these studies indicate that cells and tissues exhibit biological, as well as biophysical, windows in their response to a variety of exogenous EMF signals.

Keywords

Conduction Pathway Cell Array Pulse Radio Frequency Transmembrane Voltage Squid Axon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S.M. Bawin, L.K. Kaczmarek and W.R. Adey, Effects of modulated VHF fields on the central nervous system, Ann NYAcad Sci, (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.S. Markov, Biological mechanisms of the magnetic field action, IEEE Transaction of Magnetics, v.Mag-17: 2334, (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.G. Yost and R.P. Liburdy, Time-varying and static magnetic fields act in combination to alter calcium signal transduction in the lymphocyte, FEBS Letters 296:117, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Wallaczek, Electromagnetic field effects on cells of the immune system: the role of calcium signaling, FASEB J. 6:3177, (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Fitzsimmons, D.J. Baylink, J.T. Ryaby and F. Magee, EMF-stimulated bone-cell proliferation, in: Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, M. Blank, ed., San Francisco Press, p. 899 (1993).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.B. Lyle, X. Wang, R.D. Ayotte, A.R. Sheppard and W.R. Adey, Calcium uptake by leukemic and normal T-lymphocytes exposed to low frequency magnetic fields, Bioelecrromagnetics, 12:145, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.F. Blackmann, S.G. Benane, J.R. Rabinowitz, D.E. House and W.T. Joins, A role for the magnetic field in the radiation-induced efflux of calcium from brain tissue in vitro, Bioelectromagnetics, 6:327, (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.R. Liboff, R.J. Rozek, M.L. Sherman, B.R. McLeod, and S.D. Smith, Ca45 cyclotron resonance in human lymphocytes,Bioelectricity, 6:13, (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.S. Markov, S. Wang and A.A. Pilla, Effects of weak low frequency sinusoidal and DC magnetic fields on myosin phosphorylation in a cell-free preparation, Bioelectrochem and Bioenerg, 30:119, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.A.L. Basset, A.A. Pilla and R.J. Pawluk, A non-surgical salvage of surgically-resistant pseudarthroses and non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields. A preliminary report, Clin Ortho Re/ Res, 124:128, (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.A. Salzberg, S.A. Cooper, P. Perez, M.G. Viehbeck and D.W. Byrne, The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study, Ostomy Wound Managemen, (1995).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Pienkowski, S.R. Pollack, C.T. Brighton and N.J. Griffith, Comparison of asymmetrical and symmetrical pulse waveformsin electromagnetic stimulation, J Orthopaedic Res, 10:247, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.B. Hotary and K.R. Robinson, Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption, Developmental Biology 166:789, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.F. Spear, L.N. Horowitz, A.B. Hodess, H. MacVaugh Ill and E.N. Moore. Cellular electrophysiology of human myocardial infarction, Circulation 59:247, (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A..A. Pilla, P.R. Nasser, J.J. Kaufman, Gap junction impedance, tissue dielectrics and thermal noise limits for electromagnetic field bioeffects, Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 30:63, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.L. Hodgkin and A.F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,J Physiol 117:500, (1952).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.M. Fishman, D.J.M Poussart, L.E. Moore and E. Siebenga, K+ conduction from the low frequency impedance and admittance of squid axon, J Membrane Biology, 32:255, (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H.M. Fishman, D.J.M Poussart and L.E. Moore, Complex admittance of Na+ conduction in squid axon, J Membrane Biology, (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Muehsam
    • 1
  • Arthur A. Pilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Bioelectrochemistry Laboratory- Department of OrthopaedicsMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations