Myoglobin Function Evaluated in Working Heart Tissue

  • Jason D. Gardner
  • Roy W. Schubert
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 454)

Abstract

Previous modeling efforts suggest that myoglobin-facilitated diffusion contributes very little to oxygen transport in a Krebs-Henseleit perfused isolated heart when literature-derived values for the diffusion coefficient of myoglobin (DMb) were used. Simulations have strongly suggested that the contractile mechanisms of muscle may augment diffusion in working preparations. Myoglobin-facilitated oxygen diffusion may be augmented by the same mechanism. In this study, parameters of an oxygen transport to tissue model are optimized to investigate the possibility of elevated diffusion coefficients for oxygen and myoglobin in working heart tissue.

The Radially-Averaged, Axially-Distributed (RAAD) model considers axial diffusion of oxygen in tissue, myoglobin facilitation of oxygen transport, and pO2-dependent oxygen consumption (Michaelis-Menten kinetics). Models are solved numerically using a variable-mesh finite-difference scheme. Parameters are optimized using a Nelder-Mead simplex routine and are chosen to minimize the sum-of-squares error (SSE) between model oxygen partial pressure (pO2) predictions and experimental pO2 data. Models are solved both with and without myoglobin facilitation.

Myoglobin was found to have little effect on the oxygen distribution predicted by the models. Optimized values for the oxygen diffusion coefficient remained elevated. However, optimized values for myoglobin diffusion coefficient were found to be less than measured values. The RAAD model optimization results suggest that myoglobin does not significantly facilitate oxygen diffusion to tissue in the steady state and that myoglobin diffusion is not elevated in working heart.

Keywords

Permeability Convection Expense Dial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schubert RW, Whalen WJ, Nair P. Myocardial PO2 Distribution: Relationship to Coronary Autoregulation. Am J Physiol 1978;234:H361–70.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krogh A. The Number and Distribution of Capillaries in Muscles with Calculations of the Oxygen Pressure Head Necessary for Supplying the Tissue. J Phys 1919;52:409–15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fletcher JE, Schubert RW. Axial Diffusion and Wall Permeability Effects in Perfused Capillary-Tissue Structures. BioSystems 1987;20:153–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schubert RW, Whalen WJ. A Mass Transport Model for Predicting 02 Distribution in the Autoregulating Myocardium. Microvas Res 1976; 11(1): 127.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schubert RW, Fletcher JE, Reneau DD. Bruley DF, H.I. Bicher, editors. Oxygen Transport to Tissue — VI. New York: Plenum Press; 1985;An Analytical Model for Axial Diffusion in the Krogh Cylinder, p. 433–42.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner JD, Schubert RW. Oxygen Transport to Tissue — XVIII. New York: Plenum Press; 1995;Evaluation of Myoglobin in the Presence of Axial Diffusion, p. 157–69.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schubert RW, Zhang X. Oxygen Transport to Tissue — XVIII. New York: Plenum Press; 1995; The Krogh Cylinder Revisited: Axial Transport.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Homer LD, Shelton JB, Dorsey CH, Williams TJ. Anisotropic Diffusion of Oxygen in Slices of Rat Muscle. Am J Physiol 1984;246:R107–13.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Napper SA, Schubert RW. Mathematical Evidence for Flow-Induced Changes in Myocardial Oxygen Consumption. Ann Biomed Eng 1988; 16:349–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schubert RW, Fletcher JE. Rethinking Oxygen Transport to Tissue: Model and Experiment Compared. Comments on Theoretical Biology 1993;3(l): pp23-42.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kreuzer F, Hoofd L. Handbook of Physiology. Washington, D.C. American Physiological Society; 1982;Facilitated Diffusion of 02 and CO2. p. 89–141.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaquez JA. The Physiological Role of Myoglobin: More Than a Problem in Reaction-Diffusion Kinetics. Math Biosci 1984;68:57–97.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fletcher JE. Facilitated Oxygen Diffusion in Muscle Tissues. Biophys J 1980;29:437–58.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lentini M, Pereyra V. An Adaptive Finite Difference Solver for Nonlinear Two-Point Boundary Problems with Mild Boundary Layers. SIAM J Num Anal 1979; 14:91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Press WH; Teukolsky SA; Vetterling WT, et al. Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanderkooi JM, Erecinska M, Silver IA. Oxygen in Mammalian Tissue: Methods of Measurement and Affinities of Various Reactions. Am J Physiol 1991;26O:C1131–50.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popel AS, Pittman RN, Ellsworth ML. Rate of Oxygen Loss from Arterioles is an Order of Magnitude Higher Than Expected. Am J Physiol 1989;256:H921–4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papadopoulos S, Jurgens KD, Gros G. Diffusion of Myoglobin in Skeletal Muscle Cells — Dependence on Fibre Type, Contraction and Temperature. Pflugers Arch — Eur J Physiol 1995;430:519–025.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wittenberg JB, Wittenberg BA. Mechanisms of Cytoplasmic Hemoglobin and Myoglobin Function. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1990; 19:217–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baylor SM, Pape PC. Measurement of Myoglobin Diffusivity in the Myoplasm of Frog Skeletal Muscle Fibres. J Phys 1987;406:247–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason D. Gardner
    • 1
  • Roy W. Schubert
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentLouisiana Tech UniversityRustonUSA

Personalised recommendations