Skip to main content

Abstract

Constipation affects 5-20% of the population and is more common in females. Each year, it accounts for more than 2.5 million patient visits to physicians [1,2]. In 1994, $840 million was spent on laxatives [3] and in 1985, $354 million was spent on health care services for patients with constipation [4]. Today, the expenditure is likely to be much higher because of escalating health care costs, an increasing array of diagnostic tests and an increasing recognition of this problem. However, in the community, many patients self-treat their “constipation”, often successfully, using either home remedies or laxatives. Hence, those who seek medical help merely constitute the tip of the “constipation iceberg”. Most of these patients have a significant problem, which merits further evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation. 1958–1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:606–611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders; prevalence, sociodemography and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1569–1580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao SSC, Manometric evaluation of constipation — Part I. The Gastroenterologist 1996;4:145–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnenberg, A, Everhart, JE, Brown, DM. The economic cost of constipation. In: Kamm, MA & LennardJones, JE eds. Constipation. Petersfield, UK: Wrightson Biomedical Publishing, Ltd., 1994:19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rao, SSC, Leistikow J, Ackerson K, Hatfield R, Welcher K, Chamberlain M. Colonic motor patterns in healthy humans. A 24-hour ambulatory study. Gastroenterology 1998:114–A829.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Narducci F, Bassotti G, Gavurri M, Morelli A. Twenty-four hour manometric recordings of colonic motor activity in healthy man. Gut 1987; 28:17–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bassotti G, Gavurri M. Manometric investigation of high amplitude propagated contractile activity of the human colon. Am J Physiol 1988; 255:G660–G664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao SSC, Sadeghi P, Leistikow J. Colonic pressure activity during spontaneous defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1998; A-12:1594.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rao SSC, Hatfield R, Leistikow J. Does the rectum generate a pushing force during defecation. Gastroenterology 1998;114:A824–825.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Whitehead WE, Chaussade S, Corazziari E, Kumar D. Report of an international workshop on management of constipation. Gastroenterol Intl 1991; 4:97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burkitt DP, Walker ARP, Painter NS. Effect of dietary fibre on stool and transit times and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 1972;ii:1408–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tucker DM, Sandstead HH, Logan GM, et al. Dietary fiber and personality factors as determinants of stool output. Gastroenterology 1981;81:879–883.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Voderholzer WA, Schtke W, Mthldorfer BE, Klauser AG, Birkner B, Miller-Lissner SA. Clinical response to dietary fiber treatment of chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:95–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wald A, Hinds JP, Caruanna BJ. Psychological and physiological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gastorenterology 1989;97:932–937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Devroede G, Girand G, Bouchoucha M, et al. Idiopathic constipation by colonic dysfunction: Relationship with personality and anxiety. Dig Dis Sei 1989;34:1428–1433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamal N, Chami T, Andersen A, et al. Delayed gastrointestinal transit times in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1320–1324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drossman DA, Leserman J, Nachman G, Li Z, Gluck H, Toomey TC, Mitchell CM. Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:828–833.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker EA, Katon WJ, Roy-Byrne PP, Jemelka RP. Russo J. Histories of sexual victimization in patients with irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease. Am J. Psychiatry 1993; 150:1502–1506.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao SSC, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS. Obstructive Defecation (OD): A failure of rectoanal coordination. Am.J Gastroenterol 1998;93:1042–1050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao S, Chamberlain M, Hatfield J, Leistikow J, Zimmerman B. Ambulatory 24-hour colonic motility in health and in patients with constipation (abstract). Gastroenterology 1997;112:A809.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao SSC, Hatfield R, Chamberlain M, Stumbo P. Is the gastrocolonic response influenced by fat or carbohydrate content of a meal? Gastroenterology 1996;110:A742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bazzocchi G, Ellis J, Villanueva-Myer J, et al. Postprandial colonic transit and motor activity in chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 1990;98:686–693.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Snape WJ Jr, Matrazzo SA, Cohen SM. Effect of eating and gastrointestinal hormones on human colonic myoelectrical motor activity. Gastroenterology 1978;75:373–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Read NW, Abouzekry L, Read MG, Howell P, Ottewell D, Donnelly TC. Anorectal function in elderly patients with fecal impaction. Gastroenterology 1985;89:959–966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashraf W, Park F, Quigley EMM, Lai An examination of the reliability of reported stool frequency in the diagnosis of idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1996, 91:26–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE. The normal range and a simple diagram for recording whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:15–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, et al. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastorenterology l987;92:40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ehrenpreis ED, Jorge JMN, Schiano TD, Zaitman D, Kane SV. Why colonic marker studies don’t measure transit time. Gastroenterology 1997; 110A 728 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rao SSC, Welcher K. Periodic rectal motor activity: Intrinsic colonic gatekeeper. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:890–897.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Soifer EE, Scalabrini P, Wingate DL. Prolonged ambulant monitoring of human colonic motility. Am J Physiol 1989;257:G601–G606.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chaudhary NA, Truelone SC. Human colonic motility: a comparative study of normal subjects, patients with ulcerative colitis and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. I Resting pattern of motility. Gastroenterology 1961; 40:11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rao SSC, Suls J, Hatfield R, Summers RW. Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motor activity (abstract). Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:985–990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Narducci F, Snape WJ, Battle WM, London RL, Cohen S. Increased colonic motility during exposure to a stressful situation. Dig Dis Sci 1985; 30:40–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lorenzo DiC, Flores AF, Reddy SN, Hyman PE. Use of colonic manometry to differentiate causes of intractable constipation in children. J Pediatr 1992; 120:690–6695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao SSC, Patel RS. How useful are manometric tests in the evaluation of defecation disorders. Am J. Gastroenterol 1997;92:469–475.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wexner SD, Jorge JMN. Colorectal physiological tests. Use or abuse of technology? Eur J Surg 1994;160:167–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wald A: Colonic and anorectal motility testing in clinical practice. Am J. Gastroenterol 1994;89:2109–2115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rao SSC, Rao S, Hatfield R, Chamberlain M. Is the simulated defecation test influenced by position, presence of artificial stool and its consistency? Gastroenterology 1996;110:A741.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pelsang RE, Rao SSC, and Welcher K.: FECOM: A new artificial stool for assessing defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:183–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun WM, Donnelly TC, Read NW. Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography, and sensation in determining the mechanism of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Gut 1992;33:807–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Heaton KW, Wood N, Cripps HA, Philipp R. The call to stool and its relationship to constipation: a community study. Eur J Gast Hepaol 1994;6:145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Krevsky B, Mauer A, Malmud LS, Fisher RS. Cisapride accelerates colonic transit in constipated patients with colonic inertia. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:882–887.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Soffer EE, Metcalf A, Launspach J. Misoprostol is effective treatment for patients with severe chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:923–933.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sninsky CA, Verne GN, Gordon JM, Eaker EY, Davis RH. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study evaluating the effectiveness of colchicine in the treatment of severe idiopathic constipation (abstract). Gastroenterology 1998;114(4):A839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zamboni L, Talarico R, Morselli Labae AM, Malavolti M, Cicognani C, Sama C, Barbara L. Urosodeoxy cholic acid in the management of primary constipation. A cross over study. Gastroenterology 1995;108:Al207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rao SSC, Loening-Baucke V, Enck P. Biofeedback therapy for defecation disorders. Dig Dis 1997; 15 (Suppl 1):78–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Enck P. Biofeedback training in disordered defecation: A critical review. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:1953–1960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Andorsky Rl, Goldner F. Colonic lavage solution (polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution) as a treatment for chronic constipation: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:261–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pemberton JH, Rath DM, Ilstrup DM. Evaluation and surgical treatment of severe chronic constipation. Ann Surg 1991;214: 403–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rao, S.S.C. (1999). Constipation. In: Rao, S.S.C., Conklin, J.L., Johlin, F.C., Murray, J.A., Schulze-Delrieu, K.S., Summers, R.W. (eds) Gastrointestinal Motility. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4803-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4803-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7176-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4803-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics