Abstract
Engineering design based on damage tolerance criteria requires assuming the presence of flaws that are not detected in production and life-cycle maintenance operations [1,2]. Structural integrity is assured during service life by material selection and design load control to accommodate flaws that cannot be, or are not detected during final inspection and acceptance. Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is the primary basis for the assumed detection capability (no flaws present that are larger than the assumed size) and it is necessary to quantify to applied NDE detection capabilities to assure that design / structural integrity requirements are met. NDE methods involve multiple application parameters and the resultant detection capability varies with each application. For critical structures, it is necessary to quantify detection capabilities for each application and to maintain rigid process control to assure that the detection capability is constant. The smallest flaw detected is not important. The largest flaw missed is the parameter of primary concern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NHB 8071.1, Fracture Control Requirements for Payloads Using the National Space Transportation System (NSTS), National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
MIL-A-83444, Damage Tolerance Requirements; MIL-STD-1530, Aircraft Design Requirements (Now discontinued).
NDE Capabilities Data Book (3rd Edition-1997), available from NTIAC, 415 Crystal Creek Drive, Austin, TX 78736-4725, Telephone: (512) 263-2106, (800) NTIAC 39, FAX: (512) 263–3530.
NASA (MSFC)—STD-1249, Standard NDE Guidelines and Requirements for Fracture Control Programs.
AGARD-LS-190, A Recommended Methodology for Quantifying NDE/NDI Based on Aircraft Engine Experience, AGARD LECTURE SERIES, April 1993.
Rummel, Ward D., Recommended Practice for Demonstration of Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Reliability on Aircraft Production Parts, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 40, No. 9, August 1982, pp. 922–932. (Note: Now considered to be obsolete).
Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Metals Handbook, Vol. 17, ASM International, September 1989, pp. 662–715.
Berens, A. P. and P. W. Hovey, Flaw Detection Reliability Criteria—Volume I, Methods and Results. AFWAL-TR-83-4089, April 1984.
NDE Capabilities Data Book (3rd Edition-1997), op. Cit.
Rummel, Ward D., Probability of Detection As a Quantitative Measure of Nondestructive Testing End-To-En Process Capabilities, Materials Evaluation, Vol 56, No. 1, January 1998, pp 29–35.
NDE Capabilities Data Book (3rd Edition-1997), CD-ROM Version, op. Cit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rummel, W.D., Matzkanin, G.A. (1999). How Good is Your Inspection? How Do You Measure Up?. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol 18 A. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_301
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_301
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7170-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4791-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive