Advertisement

Scanning Acoustic Microscopic of Single Fiber Fragmentation

  • Shamachary Sathish
  • Madhu S. Madhukar
  • John H. Cantrell
  • William T. Yost
Chapter
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series (RPQN, volume 18 A)

Abstract

High performance fibers are reinforced into polymers, metals and ceramic to produce high strength, high modulus and lower density materials. The mechanical properties of the composites materials not only depend on the constituents but also on the properties of the interface/interphase region between the fiber and the matrix [1,2,3]. It has also been established that the interphasial region determines the load transfer from the matrix to the fiber and from broken fibers to the surviving fibers. Since the overall mechanical properties, load bearing and transferring abilities of a composite decides its effectiveness, it is important to measure and understand the properties of the interphasial region. Such a study will guide in tailoring the performance of composite materials. A parameter that is often used in quantifying the properties of the fiber matrix interface is the Interphasial Shear Strength (IFSS). Several direct and indirect measurement techniques [4] have been developed in the last three decades to measure the IFFS in composite materials. Measurement of interlaminar shear strength, transverse shear strength, flexural strength, on full scale composite have been observed to be indirectly related to the interfacial shear strength. Direct measurement of IFSS are usually performed on individual fibers in a matrix. Some of the well established techniques in this category are fiber pull out[5], fiber push in[5], shear debond[5,6], microindentation[7] and the single fiber fragmentation tests[8]. Though these tests provide quantitative results they are dependent on the sample geometry and the model of the stress field around the fiber. Of all the direct IFSS measurement techniques single fiber fragmentation technique is believed to have stress transfer characteristics that are similar to that of full scale composites. Because of its simplicity it is receiving lot of attention.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission Acoustic Impedance Interfacial Shear Strength Fiber Break Acoustic Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. T. Drzal, M. J. Rich, and P. F. Lloyd J. Adhes., 16, 1 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Herrera, W. L. Wu, M. S. Madhukar and L. T. Drzal, “Contemporary methods for the Measurement of fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength” 46 Annual conference, composite institute, The Society of the Plastics industry, Inc (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Narkis, E. J. H. Chen, and R. B. Pipes, Poly. Compos., 9, 245 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. J. Kerns, R. S. Hay, N. J. Pagano and T. A. Parthasarathy, Ceramic Bull. 68, 429 (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. J. Broutman “Measurement of the fiber-polymer matrix interfacial strength” in Interfaces in Composites STP 452, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia 1969) p 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. M. Hawthorne and E. Teghtsoonian, J. Adhesion 6, 85 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. F. Mandel, J. H. Chen and F. J. McGarry, Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 1, 40(1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kelly and W. R. Tyson, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 13, 329 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. N. Netravali, Z.-F. Li W. Sachse and H. F. Wu, J. Materl. Sci. 26, 6631 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Karpur, T. Matikas and S. Krishnamurthy., “Matrix-fiber interface characterization in metal matrix composites using ultrasonic imaging of fiber fragmentation” in American Society for Composites, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 1992, pp 420.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. S. Madhukar, R. P. Kosuri and K. J. Bowles., “Reduction of curing induced fiber stresses by curing cycle optimization in polymer matrix composites” in Proc. ICCM-10, Vol.III, pp 157, Ed. A. Poursartip and K. Street, The Tenth International Conference on Composite Materials Society, Vancouver, Canada and Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, England, (1995).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. B. Nagy, J. NDE, 11, 127 (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shamachary Sathish
    • 1
  • Madhu S. Madhukar
    • 2
  • John H. Cantrell
    • 3
  • William T. Yost
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Dayton Research InstituteDaytonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Engineering Sciences and MechanicsUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations