Advertisement

Historical, Archaeology, Capitalism

  • Matthew Johnson
Part of the Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology book series (CGHA)

Abstract

In this paper I want to support the central thrust of this volume, namely the call for a historical archaeology of capitalism. Writing such an archaeology is a complex and difficult task, and I seek to explore some of the general problems raised by such a call as explored both in my own work and in the papers published here. My paper will concentrate its comments on several distinct, but clearly related, issues: space, time, context, material culture, and politics. Aspects of these issues have been raised before in the context of an archaeology of the modern world (Orser 1996), but I want to argue here that such concepts are not only central to an archaeology of capitalism, they are themselves central to the practice of archaeology in all areas and places, and as such can be considered the basic building blocks of archaeology as a whole. An archaeology of capitalism is, consequently, much more than an “offshoot” of more traditional archaeological concerns; it is situated at the core of the discipline of archaeology conceived in a holistic sense. I will discuss this relationship between historical and other archaeologies further in the conclusions.

Keywords

Material Culture Sixteenth Century Historical Archaeology Class Struggle Farm Tenancy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andren, A. 1998 Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Prespective. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Aston, T.H., and C.H.E. Philpin (editors) 1985 The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Prelndustrial Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, J. 1994 Fragments of Antiquity. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, R. 1985 The agrarian roots of European capitalism. In The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Development in Preindustrial Europe, edited by T.H. Aston and C.H.E. Philpin, pp. 213–227. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brumflel, E.M. 1992 Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem— gender, class and faction steal the show. American Anthropologist 94:551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrithers, M. 1992 Why Humans Have Cultures: Explaining Anthropology and Social Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Courtney, P. 1996 In small things forgotten: the Georgian world view, material culture and the consumer revolution. Rural History 7(1):87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, M.H. 1996 An Archaeology of Capitalism. Blackwell, Oxford, in press Genealogies of the Georgian order. Historical Archaeology.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, D. 1987 Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Mukerji, C. 1983 From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Orser, C.E. 1996 An Historical Archaeology of the Modern World. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Potter, P. 1994 Archaeology in Annapolis: A Critical Approach to Archaeology in Maryland’s Ancient City. Washington, Smithsonian.Google Scholar
  13. Samuel, R. 1995 Theatres of Memory. Verso, London.Google Scholar
  14. Tait, H. 1996 The great divide. In The Age of Transition: The Archaeology of English Culture 1400-1600, edited by D. Gaimster and P. Stamper, pp. 1–8. Oxbow, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Thompson, P. 1967 The Work of William Morris. Quartet, London.Google Scholar
  16. Underdown, D. 1985 Revel, Riot and Rebellion: Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603-1660. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of DurhamDurhamEngland

Personalised recommendations