Advertisement

Thomas Process and Wave Function Imaging in P-He Transfer Ionization Investigated by Coltrims

  • V. Mergel
  • R. Dörner
  • M. Achler
  • Kh. Khayyat
  • O. Jagutzki
  • L. Spielberger
  • A. Salin
  • C. J. Wood
  • R. E. Olson
  • Dž. Belkić
  • C. L. Cocke
  • J. H. McGuire
  • H. Schmidt-Böcking
Chapter
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PAMO)

Abstract

One of the fundamental capture mechanisms for fast ion atom collisions was proposed by L.H. Thomas in 19271 based on a classical treatment and observed by Palinkas et al,2 for the first time. This Thomas process can be understood as two consecutive binary collisions, first by the projectile with one of the target electrons and, second, between this electron and either the target nucleus (e-N-Thomas-scattering) or another target electron (e-e-Thomas-scattering). The e-e-Thomas-scattering offers a unique possibility to investigate dynamic electron-electron- (e-e-) correlation in atomic collision processes. For fast proton impact the perturbation of the target (in our case helium) is small and the electrons are quickly removed from the bound state by the e-e-Thomas-scattering. The e-e-Thomas-scattering always leads to a double ionization of the target, while the capture can either be to a bound (transfer ion-ization, TI) or a continuum state of the projectile3. Thus this process will leave the nucleus behind with its momentum distribution from the initial ground state, which mirrors the sum momentum of the 2 electrons. Furthermore the absolute probability for that process yields information on the spatial distribution of the two electrons.

Keywords

Momentum Distribution Transfer Ionization Momentum Component Double Ionization Target Electron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L.H. Thomas. Proc. Roy. Soc., A114:561–76, 1927.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Palinkas, R. Schuch, H. Cederquist, and O. Gustafsson. Phys. Rev. Lett., 63(22):2464–67, 1989.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jamal Berakdar. PhD thesis, Universität Freiburg, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert Gayet and Antoine Salin. J. Phys., B20:L571–76, 1987.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Dörner, V. Mergel, R. Ali, U. Buck, C.L. Cocke, K. Froschauer, O. Jagutzki, S. Lencinas, W.E. Meyerhof, S. Nüttgens, R.E. Olson, H. Schmidt-Böcking, L. Spielberger, K. Tökesi, J. Ullrich, M. Unverzagt, and W. Wu. Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:3166–69, 1994.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Mergel, R. Dörner, J. Ullrich, O. Jagutzki, S. Lencinas, S. Niittgens, L. Spielberger, M. Unverzagt, C.L. Cocke, R.E. Olson, M. Schulz, U. Buck, E. Zanger, W. Theisinger, M. Isser, S. Geis, and H. Schmidt-Böcking. Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:2200–2203, 1995.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Volker Mergel. PhD thesis, Universität Frankfurt/Main, ISBN 3-8265-2067-X, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, R. D”orner, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, H. Schmidt-Böcking, and L. Spielberger. J. Phys., B30:2917, 1997. Topical Review.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Horsdal-Pedersen, C.L. Cocke, and M. Stöckli. Phys. Rev. Lett., 50:1910–13, 1983.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antoine Salin. J. Phys., B22:3901–14, 1989.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robert Gayet and Antoine Salin. Nucd. Instr. Meth., B56/57:82–85, 1991.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Mergel, R. Dörner, M. Achler, Kh. Khayyat, S. Lencinas, J. Euler, O. Jagutzki, S. Niittgens, M. Unverzagt, L. Spielberger, W. Wu, R. Ali, J. Ullrich, H. Cederquist, A. Salin, R.E. Olson, Dž. Belkić, C.L. Cocke, and H. Schmidt-Böcking. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79:387–90, 1997.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    John S. Briggs and Knud Taulbjerg. J. Phys., B12:2565–73, 1979.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robin Shakeshaft and Larry Spruch. Rev. Mod. Phys., 51:369–405, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dževad Belkic. Nud. Instr. Meth., B99:218–24, 1995.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Mergel
    • 1
  • R. Dörner
    • 1
  • M. Achler
    • 1
  • Kh. Khayyat
    • 1
  • O. Jagutzki
    • 1
  • L. Spielberger
    • 1
  • A. Salin
    • 2
  • C. J. Wood
    • 3
  • R. E. Olson
    • 3
  • Dž. Belkić
    • 4
  • C. L. Cocke
    • 5
  • J. H. McGuire
    • 6
  • H. Schmidt-Böcking
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für KernphysikUniversität FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.CNRS and Université BordeauxTalenceFrance
  3. 3.University of Missouri-RollaMissouriUSA
  4. 4.Atomic PhysicsStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  6. 6.Tulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations