Abstract
Advances in genetics and molecular biology over the past 20 years have brought intellectual property issues to the fore in the life sciences. During the 1970s, patent applications on biological molecules with potential as new products, biologically-based processes, and genetically modified organisms were made on an increasingly large scale by a vibrant and growing U.S. biotechnology industry and by U.S. academic scientists, particularly those who were active in developing academic-industry links. Today, the use of intellectual property in the life sciences and some specialised biotechnology areas has become so well established that academic public sector scientists and industry researchers alike file patent applications on nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), proteins, cell lines, genetically modified micro-organisms, transgenic animals and plants. Nevertheless, the development of intellectual property rights for the life sciences has been the subject of wide and intense debate. Nowhere has this been more evident than in the human genome project. Genomics, the analysis of structure of function in human, plant, animal and microbial genomes is one area of the life sciences where patenting is likely to be particularly intensive in the next decade. In this chapter, current issues raised by the application of intellectual property rights to research and development in human genome analysis and their implications for public policy are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ballantine, B., Burke, J.F. & Thomas, S.M. 1997. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Biotechnology in Europe. Report for EuropaBio, Brussels.
European Commission 1997. The Europeans and Modern Biotechnology: Eurobarometer 46.1, European Commission Directorate General XII, Science, Research and Development, Brussels.
Heller, M. & Eisenberg, R. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research” Science, Vol. 280, p. 698–701.
Kenney, M. 1986. Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Masood, E. 1998. “Iceland Poised to Sell Exclusive Rights to National Health Data” Nature, Vol. 396, p. 395.
Masood, E. 1999. “Consortium Plans Free SNP Map of Human Genome” Nature, Vol. 398, pp. 545–546.
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1992. Biotechnology in a Global Economy, OTA, Washington, D.C.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1998. Report of the NIH Working Group on Research Tools,http://www.nih.govinewslresearch.tools/index.htm
Saegusa, A. 1999. “US Firm’s Bid to Sequence Rice Genome Causes Stir in Japan” Nature, Vol. 398, p. 545.
Thomas, S.M. et al. 1996. “Ownership of the Human Genome” Nature, Vol. 380(6573), pp. 387–388.
Thomas, S.M. et al. 1997. “Public Sector Patents on Human DNA” Nature, Vol. 388(6644), p. 709.
Thomas, S.M. et al. 1998. The Industrial Exploitation of Genomes. Report to the European Commission, Brussels.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, S.M. (1999). Intellectual Property Rights and the Human Genome. In: Caulfield, T.A., Williams-Jones, B. (eds) The Commercialization of Genetic Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7135-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4713-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive