Analysis, Findings and Conclusions
In the Overview beginning Part II of this book, we discussed our selection of cases in relation to theory, concepts, and policies. We also discussed making analytical generalisations from a theoretically based sample of comparable cases. Now, after reviewing relevant theoretical, conceptual and policy issues in Part I of this book, and presenting a series of empirical case studies in Part II, we turn to a comparative analysis of the case studies. As discussed in our Introduction, our analysis is theoretically informed, and its object is to produce analytical generalisations. These will later provide the basis for developing policy implications.
KeywordsCoherence Assure Expense Tria Tral
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation approaches: Their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. London: Pinter Publishers/ Casell Academic.Google Scholar
- Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions (pp. 41–63). London: Pinter Publishers/Casell Academic.Google Scholar
- Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behaviour. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B. (1992). Institutional learning. In B.-Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 23–67). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems (Bednarz, J. with D. Baecker, Trans.). (English ed.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar