Abstract
In 1989, the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum, which had been taken from South America and released around the world to control pestiferous Opuntia cacti on which it feeds, appeared in the Florida Keys. How it got there is uncertain. The moth was introduced into the Caribbean island of Nevis in 1957 and then moved by local authorities to other islands (Tuduri et al. 1971). It then either island hopped, as it had in Hawaii (Tuduri et al. 1971), and jumped from Cuba to the Florida Keys, or was carried inadvertently on ornamental cacti imported into Miami, Florida from pads collected in Hispaniola (Pemberton 1995). However, the moth was not noticed in Miami before it was found in the lower Keys so we tend to favor the natural dispersion explanation. The results of this invasion/introduction were rapid and serious. The moth dispersed 320 miles northward through Florida from 1989 to 1991 to reach Brevard County (Johnson and Stiling 1998). On average, from six sites throughout Florida, over 90% of Opuntia stricta plants with more than 10 pads exhibited feeding damage. In 1997 Cactoblastis was found in the Jacksonville area (Stiling, personal observation). If the moth can survive in Jacksonville, it could move across the Gulf Coast states into Texas and beyond. This prompts concern not only for native Florida cacti but also for cacti native to the rest of the North American continent (especially the Opuntia-rich desert southwest). Rare cacti may be particularly at risk. Opuntia spinosissima, whose entire U.S. population consists of 12 plants in the Florida Keys, is a preferred host of Cactoblastis larvae (Johnson and Stiling 1996). Individuals now exist inside cages designed to protect them from Cactoblastis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askew, R. R. 1986. Parasitoid communities: their size, structure, and development. In J. Waage and D. Greathead (eds.), Insect parasitoids. Academic Press, London, UK. p. 225–264.
Askew, R. R. 1994. Parasitoids of leaf-mining Lepidoptera: what determines their host ranges? In B.A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan (eds), Parasitoid community ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK. p. 177–202
Askew, R. R. 1980. The diversity of insect communities in leaf-mines and plant galls. J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 817–829.
Barratt, B. I. P., A. A. Evans, C. M. Ferguson, G. M. Barker, M. R. McNeill, and C.B. Phillips. 1997. Laboratory nontarget host range of the introduced parasitoids Microctonus aethiopoides and M. hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) compared with field parasitism in N.Z. Environ. Entomol. 26: 694–702.
Boldt, P. E. 1998. Letter. Science. In press.
Boldt, P. E. 1997. Response of a Rhinocyllus researcher. Biol. Control News Info. 18(4): 100.
Carruthers, R. I., and J. A. Onsager. 1993. Perspective on the use of exotic natural enemies for biological control of pest grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 885–903.
Center, T. D. 1995. Review of selection criteria and ecological consequences of importing natural enemies. Edited by W. C. Kauffman and J. R. Nechols. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 524–526.
Civeyrel, L., and D. Simberloff. 1996. A tale of two snails: is the cure worse than the disease? Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 1231–1252.
Clausen, C. P. (ed). 1978. Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world view. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handbk. 480.
Diamond, J. M. 1996. A-bombs against amphibians. Nature 383: 386–387.
Duan, J. J., and R. H. Messing. 1996. Response of two opiine fruit fly parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to the lantana gall fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 25: 1428–1437.
Duan, J. J., and R. H. Messing. 1998. Effect of Tetrastichus giffardianus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) an nontarget flowerhead-feeding tephritids (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 27: 1022–1028.
Ehler, L. 1991. Planned introductions in biological control. In L. Ginzburg (ed.), assessing ecological risks of biotechnology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. p. 1–39.
Elliott, N., R. Kieckhefer, and W. Kauffman. 1996. Effects of an invading coccinellid on native coccinellids in an agricultural landscape. Oecologia 105: 537–54.
Follett, P. A., M. T. Johnson, and V. P. Jones. 1999. Parasitoid drift in Hawaiian pentatomoids. In P. A. Follett and J. J. Duan, (eds.), Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frank, J. H. 1998. How risky is biological control? Comment. Ecology. 79: 1829–1834.
Frank, J. H., and E. D. McCoy. 1993. The introduction of insects into Florida. Florida Entomologist 76: 1–53.
Funasaki, G. Y., P.-Y. Lai, L. M. Nakahara, J. W. Beardsley, and A. K. Ota. 1988. A review of biological control introductions in Hawaii: 1890 to 1985. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 28: 105–160.
Gonzalez, D., and F. E. Gilstrap. 1992. Foreign exploration: assessing and prioritizing natural enemies and consequences of preintroduction studies. In W. C. Kauffman and J. E. Nechols (eds), Selection criteria and ecological consequences of imporing natural enemies. Entomol. Soc. Am., Lanham, Maryland. p. 51–70
Goodman, B. 1993. Research community swats grasshopper control trial. Science 260: 887.
Gould, F., G. Kennedy, and R. Kopanic. 1996. Environmental issues associated with enhancing the impact of biological control agents: a student debate. Am. Entomol. 42: 160–173.
Hajek, A. E., L. Butter, S. R. A. Walsh, J. C. Silver, F. P. Hain, F. L. Hastings, T. M. Odell, and R. D. R. Smitley. 1995. Host range of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga (Zygomycletes: Entomophthorales) in the field versus laboratory. Environ. Entomol. 25: 709–721.
Hall, R. W., and L. E. Ehler. 1979. Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25: 280–282.
Hall, R. W., L. E. Ehler., and B. Bisabri-Ershadi. 1980. Rate of success in classical biological control of arthropods. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 26: 111–114.
Hawkins, B. A. 1994. Pattern and process in host-parasitoid interactions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
Hawkins, B. A., and P. C. Marino. 1997. The colonization of native phytophagous insects in North America by exotic parasitoids. Oecologia 112: 566–571.
Hayes, W. K., D. M. Hayes, D. Brouhard, B. Goodge, and R. L. Carter. 1995. Population status and conservation of the endangered San Salvador rock iguana, Cyclura r. rileyi. J. Intl. Iguana Soc. 4:21–30.
Jervis, M. A. 1998. Reply from M. A. Jervis. Trends Ecol. Evolution 13:110.
Johnson, D. M., and P. D. Stiling. 1996. Host specificity of Cactoblastis cactorum Berg, an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Environ. Entomol. 25: 743–748.
Johnson, D. M., and P. D. Stiling. 1998. Distribution and dispersal of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-fceding moth, in Florida. Florida Entomologist 81: 12–22.
Julien, M. H., J. D. Kerr, and R. R. Chan. 1984. Biological control of weeds: an evaluation. Protection Ecol. 7: 3–25.
Louda, S. M., D. Kendall, J. Connor, and D. Simberloff. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277: 1088–1090.
Louda, S. M., D. Simberloff, J. Connor, G. Boettner, D. Kendall, and A. Arnett. 1998. Insights from data on the nontarget effects of the flowerhead weevil. Biol. Control News Info. 19: 70–72.
Luck, R. F. 1981. Parasitic insects introduced as biological control agents. In D. Pimentel (ed), CRC Handbook of pest management in agriculture, vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. p. 125–284
McFadyen, R. E. C. 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 369–393.
McLeod, J. H. 1962. A Review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Technical Communication of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 2, Farnham Royal, UK.
Nafus, D. M. 1993. Movement of introduced biological control agents onto nontarget butterflies, Hypolimnas sp. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 265–272.
Nafus, D. M., and I. H. Schreiner. 1989. Biological control activities in the Mariana Islands from 1911 to 1988. Micronesica 22: 65–106.
Obrycki, J. J., A. M. Ormond, and K. L. Giles. 1998. Interactions between an introduced and indigenous coccinellid species at different prey densities. Oecologia (in press).
Pearson, D. E., K. S. McKelvey, and L. F. Ruggiero. 1999. Indirect effects of biological control agents released to control spotted knapweed. Ecology (in press).
Pemberton, R. W. 1995. Cactoblastis cactorum in the United States: an immigrant biological control agent or an introduction of the nursery industry. Am. Entomologist 41: 230–232.
Schaffner, J. V., Jr., and C.C. Griswold. 1934. Macrolepideptera and their parasites reared from field collections in the northeastern part of the United States. U.S. Dept. Agric., Misc. Pub. 188, Washington D.C.
Secord, D., and P. Karieva. 1996. Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm. Bioscience 46: 448–453.
Sheehan, W. 1991. Host range patterns of hymenopteran parasitoids of exophytic lepidopteran folivores. In E.A. Bernays (ed.), Insect-plant interactions, vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. p. 209–248
Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1996a. How risky is biological control. Ecology 77: 1965–1974.
Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1996b. Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biol. Conserv. 78: 185–192.
Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1998. How risky is biological control: response to J. H. Frank. Ecology 79: 1834–1836.
Stamp, N. E. and M. D. Bowers. 1990. Parasitism of New England buckmoth caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturnidae) by tachinid flies. J. Lepidopterists Soc. 44: 199–200.
Stiling, P. 1990. Calculating establishment rates of parasites in classical biological control. Am. Entomologist 36: 225–230.
Stiling, P. 1993. Why do natural enemies fail in biological control campaigns? Am. Entomologist 39: 31–37.
Thomas, M. B., and A. J. Willis. 1998. Biological control—risky but necessary? Trends Ecol. Evolution 13: 325–329.
Tuduri, J. C. G., L. F. Martorell, and S. M. Gaud. 1971. Geographical distribution and host plants of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg), in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 58: 130–134.
Turner, C. E. 1985. Conflicting interests and biological control of weeds. In E. S. Delfosse (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds; Aug 19–25 1984, Vancouver, Canada. Agriculture Canada, Ottowa, Canada. p. 203–225.
Van den Bosch, R. 1971. Biological control of insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 45
Wheeler, A. G., and E. R. Hoebeke. 1995. Coccinella novemnotata in Northeastern North America: historical occurrence and current status (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 97: 701–716.
Williamson, M., and A. Fitter. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77: 1661–1670.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stiling, P., Simberloff, D. (2000). The Frequency and Strength of Nontarget Effects of Invertebrate Biological Control Agents of Plant Pests and Weeds. In: Follett, P.A., Duan, J.J. (eds) Nontarget Effects of Biological Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7067-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4577-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive