Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Nontarget Effects of Biological Control pp 245–259Cite as

Biological Control of Musk Thistle: A Reassessment

  • Chapter

Abstract

Musk thistle and nodding thistle are names commonly used to describe Old World thistles in the Carduus nutans species group (family Asteraceae). These include Carduus macrocephalus Desfontaines (big-headed thistle), C. nutans ssp. leiophyllus [Petrovic]) Stoj.and Stef. (nodding thistle) a.k.a. C. thoermeri, and C. nutans L. (musk thistle proper). According to (1986), C. macrocephalus is a subspecies of C. nutans along with C. nutans ssp. leiophyllus. Other classifications exist (Kazmi 1964, McCarty 1982, Desrochers et al. 1988). In this chapter, the term “musk thistle” will be used generically to refer to any and all of the names used in the various classification schemes. Musk thistle became established in North America sometime during the mid-1800s (Stuckey and Forsythe 1971). Introduction appears to have been accidental, possibly as seed contaminants of imported grain. By the mid-1900s, musk thistle had proliferated throughout much of the eastern and north central parts of United States (Dunn 1976) and into parts of southern Canada (Harris and Zwölfer 1971). In 1981, this weed occupied an estimated 730,000 hectares in 40 of the United States (Batra et al. 1981). In Kansas, C. nutans occurred on more than 400 hectares in 75 of the 105 counties (Robinson 1976). Musk thistle’s weed status derives from a combination of structural, developmental and ecological characteristics. The presence of sharp spines on stems, leaf margins and floral bracts of plants, and the fact that plants may reach two meters or more in height, represent a nuisance in urban and suburban landscapes. Encounters with stands of musk thistle by livestock also are reported to interrupt grazing (Batra 1978, Trumble and Kok 1982, Rees 1992). Economic losses also have resulted from the thistle’s competition with forage crops, particularly in overgrazed or disturbed pastures and rangeland (Trumble and Kok 1982, Reece and Wilson 1983, Moore et al. 1989, Fick 1995, Thompson et al. 1995). Musk thistle has been categorized as a noxious weed in many states, where control is mandated by law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andres, L. A., and N. E. Rees. 1995. Musk thistle. Chap. 67. In J. R. Nechols, L. A. Andres, J. W. Beardsley, R. D. Goeden, and C. G. Jackson (eds.), Biological control in the western United States: accomplishments and benefits of Regional Research Project W-84, 1964–1989. No. 3361. Univ. California, Div. Agric. Nat. Res., Oakland. p. 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M. P., R. H. Groves, L. M. F. Fresco, and P. E. Kaye. 1985. Relative growth of six thistle species along a nutrient gradient with multispecies competition. J. Ecology 73: 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, S. W. T. 1978. Carduus thistle distribution and biological control in northeastern states. p. 18–22. In K. E. Frick (ed.), Biological control of thistle in the genus Carduus in the United States: a progress report. U.S. Dept. Agric., Sci. and Educ. Admin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, S. W. T., J. R. Coulson, P. H. Dunn, and P. E. Boldt. 1981. Insects and fungi associated with Carduus thistles (Compositae). U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 16161616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldt, P. E., G. Campobasso, and E. Colonnelli. 1980. Palearctic distribution and host plants of Ceutorhynchus trimaculatus and Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 694–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdot, G. W. 1996. Interference between pasture plants and thistles; B, a review. Plant Prot. Quart. 11: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, B., and L. T. Kok. 1985. Growth responses of musk and plumeless thistles (Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides) to damage by Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Weed Sci. 33: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, S. L., and M. Cristofaro. 1995. Open-field tests in host-specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Biocontrol Sci. Tech. 5: 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, E. 1996. Biological Control of Weeds Project Summaries, Oregon Dept. Agric., Commodity Inspection Div., Noxious Weed Control Program, Salem. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J., and R. Pattrasudhi. 1988. Interspecific competition between insect herbivores: asymmetric competition between cinnibar moth and the ragwort seed-head fly. Ecol. Entomol. 13: 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Quattro, J. 1997. Two Italian imports tackle musk thistle. Agric. Res. (March) p. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A. M., J. F. Bain, and S. I. Warwick. 1988. A biosystematic study of the Carduus nutans complex in Canada. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1621–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. H. 1976. Distribution of Carduus nutans, C. acanthoides, C. pycnocephalus, and C. crispus in the United States. Weed Science 24: 518–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. H., and A. Rizza. 1976. Bionomics of Psylliodes chalcomera, a candidate for biological control of musk thistle. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 395–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. H., and A. Rizza. 1977. Host specificity of Psylliodes chalcomera, a candidate for biological control of musk thistle. Environ. Entomol. 6: 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. H., and G. Campobasso. 1993. Field test of the weevil Hadroplonthus trimaculatus and the fleabeetle Psylliodes chalcomera against musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Weed Sci. 41: 656–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L. E. 1990. Introduction strategies in biological control of insects. In M. Mackauer, L. E. Ehler, and J. Roland (eds.), Critical issues in biological control. Intercept, Andover, UK. p. 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fick, W. H. 1995. Ecology and control of musk thistle. Proc. 5th Intl. Rangeland Cong. p. 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden, R. D. 1978. Initial analyses of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froelich) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) as an introduced natural enemy of milk thistle (Silybum marianum [L.] Gaertner) and Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus L.) in southern California. U.S. Dept. Agric. Publ. 1978-771-106/02, Washington, D.C. p. 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden, R. D. 1995a. Italian thistle. In J. R. Nechols, L. A. Andres, J. W. Beardsley, R. D. Goeden, and C. G. Jackson (eds.), Biological control in the western United States: accomplishments and benefits of Regional Research Project W-84, 1964–1989. No. 3361, Univ. California, Div. Agric. Nat. Res., Oakland. p. 242–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden, R. D. 1995b. Milk thistle. In J. R. Nechols, L. A. Andres, J. W. Beardsley, R. D. Goeden, and C. G. Jackson (eds.), Biological control in the western United States: accomplishments and benefits of Regional Research Project W-84, 1964–1989. No. 3361, Univ. California, Div. Agric. Nat. Res., Oakland. p. 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden, R. D., and D. W. Ricker. 1985. Seasonal asynchrony of Italian thistle, Carduus pycnocephalus, and the weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), introduced for biological control in southern California. Environ. Entomol. 14: 433–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeden, R. D., D. W. Ricker, and B. A. Hawkins. 1985. Etiological and genetic differences among three biotypes of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) introduced into North America for the biological control of asteraceous thistles. p. 181–189. In E. S. Delfosse (ed.), Proc. 6th Intl. Sym. Biological Control of Weeds, Vancouver, Canada, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., and J. M. Lee. 1987. Effect of soil surface topography and litter cover on the germination, survival, and growth of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Am. J. Bot. 74: 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. 1984. Carduus nutans L., nodding thistle and C. acanthoides L. plumeless thistle (Compositae) In J. S. Kelleher and M. A. Hulme (eds.), Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Commonwealth Agric. Bur., Farnham Royal, UK. p. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., and J. D. Shorthouse. 1996. Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control. Can. Entomol. 128: 1021–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., and H. Zwölfer. 1971. Carduus acanthoides L., welted thistle, and C. nutans L., nodding thistle. In Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1959–1968. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Control Tech. Commun. no. 4. p.76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, B., and H. L. Brooks. 1993. Biological control of musk thistle in Kansas. Pub. No. L-873, Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan. 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. M., and N. E. Rees. 1976. Dispersal of Rhinocyllus conicus for biocontrol of musk thistle. Weed Sci. 24: 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. R., P. B. McEvoy, and C. S. Cox. 1992. Combining the cinnibar moth (Tyria jacobaeae) and the ragwort flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobaeae) for control of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea): an experimental analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian, M. H. (ed.). 1992. Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. Commonwealth Agric. Bur. Intl., Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi, S. M. A. 1964. Revision der gaaattung Carduus (Compositae). Teil II. Bot. Staats. Munchen, 5: 279–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T. 1975. Host specificity studies on Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the biocontrol of musk and plumeless thistle. Weed Res. 15: 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T. 1986. Impact of Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Carduus thistles in pastures. Crop Protection 5: 214–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T., and W. T. Mays. 1991. Successful biological control of plumeless thistle, Carduus acanthoides L. [Campanulatae: Asteraceae (= Compositae)], by Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Virginia. Biol. Control 1: 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T., and R. L. Pienkowski. 1985. Biological control of musk thistle by Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Virginia from 1969 and 1980. In E. S. Delfosse (ed.), Proc. 6th Internat. Symp. Biol. Contr. Weeds, August 19–25, 1984, Vancouver, Canada. Agric. Can. p. 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T., and W. W. Surles. 1975. Successful biocontrol of musk thistle by an introduced weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus. Environ. Entomol. 4: 1025–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T., and J. T. Trumble. 1979. Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): life cycle and development on Carduus thistles in Virginia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 563–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, L. T., T. J. McAvoy, and W. T. Mays. 1986. Impact of tall fescue grass and Carduus thistle weevils on the growth and development of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Weed Sci. 34: 966–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda, S. M. 1998. Population growth of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on two species of native thistles in prairie. Environ. Entomol. 27: 834–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda, S. M., and M. A. Potvin. 1995. Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76: 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda, S. M., D. Kendall, J. Connor, and D. Simberloff. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277: 1088–1090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louda, S. M., M. A. Potvin, and S. K. Collinge. 1990. Predispersal seed predation, postdispersal seed predation and competition in the recruitment of seedlings of a native thistle in Sandhills prairie. Am. Midl. Nat. 124: 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, M. K. 1982. Musk thistle (Carduus) thoermeri seed production. Weed Sci. 30: 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, M. K., and W. O. Lamp. 1982. Effect of a weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, on musk thistle (Carduus thoermeri) seed production. Weed Sci. 30: 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, M. K., C. J. Scifres, A. L. Smith and G. L. Horst. 1969. Germination and early seedling development of musk and plumeless thistle. Nebraska Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, R. L. 1986. Carduus. In T. M. Barkley (ed.), Flora of the Great Plains. Great Plains Flora Assoc., Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence. p. 895–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller-Joop and D. Schroeder. 1986. Urophora solstitialis (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). A candidate for the biological control of plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoides L.) in Canada. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Control Report. Delemont, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. B., C. J. Doyle, and A. Rahman. 1989. Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand. Crop Protection 8: 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechols, J. R. 1999. Challenges in searching for, releasing, and evaluating natural enemies of native versus exotic pests. In L. D. Charlet and G. J. Brewer (eds.), Biological control of native or indigenous insect pests: challenges, constraints, and potential. Thomas Say Publications in Entomol., Entomol. Soc. Am., Lanham, Maryland. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechols, J. R., L. A. Andres, J. W. Beardsley, R. D. Goeden, and C. G. Jackso (eds.), 1995. Biological control in the western United States: accomplishments and benefits of Regional Research Project W-84, 1964–1989. No. 3361. Univ. California, Div. Agric. and Nat. Res., Oakland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechols, James R., John J. Obrycki, Catherine A. Tauber, and Maurice J. Tauber. 1996. Potential impact of native natural enemies on Galerucella spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) imported for biological control of purple loosestrife: a field evaluation. Biol. Control 7:60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, C. G. 1910. Notes regarding the breeding of Cheilosia grossa. Entomologist 43: 313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilson, D. 1996. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50: 1492–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popay, A. I., and R. W. Medd. 1990. The biology of Australian weeds 21. Carduus nutans L. Plant Prot. Qtrly. 5: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttler, B. 1994. Redistribution and status of musk thistle weevils to enhance the reduction of musk thistle (Carduus nutans) populations in Missouri. Dept. Entomol. Spec. Rpt. Ser., Univ. Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, P. E., and R. G. Wilson. 1983. Effect of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and musk thistle (Carduus nutans) control on grass herbage. Weed Sci. 31: 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, N. E. 1977. Impact of Rhinocyllus conicus on thistles in southwestern Montana. Environ. Entomol. 6: 839–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, N. E. 1992. Biological control of two thistle species. In Biological control of forest pests in the Great Plains: status and needs; B, a symposium. Great Plains Agric. Council Pub. 145. p. 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizza, A., G. Campobasso, P. H. Dunn, and M. Stazi. 1988. Cheilosia corydon (Diptera: Syrphidae), a candidate for the biological control of musk thistle in North America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81:225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., Jr. 1976. Musk thistle: an eco-problem. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 79: 127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, J. A., H. K. Kaya, L. E. Ehler, J. J. Marois, and B. A. Jaffee. 1995. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol. Control 5: 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth, P. J., and L. T. Kok. 1982. Ovipositional preference of Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. Entomol. 114: 1201–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, J. M., K. W. Boggs, W. R. Good, P. Harris, and R. M. Nowierski. 1991. Metzneria paucipunctella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a moth introduced against spotted knapweed: its feeding strategy and impact on two introduced Urophora spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can. Entomol. 123: 1001–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L., and J. L. Forsyth. 1971. Distribution of naturalized Carduus nutans (Compositae) mapped in relation to geology in northeastern Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 71: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surles, W. W., and L. T. Kok. 1977. Ovipositional preference and synchronization of Rhinocyllus conicus with Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides. Environ. Entomol. 6: 222–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surles, W. W., L. T. Kok, and R. L. Pienkowski. 1974. Rhinocyllus conicus establishment for biocontrol of thistles in Virginia. Weed Sci. 22: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, M. J., C. A. Tauber, and S. Masaki. 1986. Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., A. E. Saunders, and P. Martin. 1995. The effect of nodding thistle (Carduus nutans) on pasture production. In M. T. K. Arroyo, P. H. Zedier, and M. D. Fox (eds.), Ecology and biogeography of Mediterranian ecosystems in Chile, California and Australia. Springer, New York. p. 311–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipping, P. W., and C. A. Holko. 1995 Annual report, Plant Protection Section, Maryland Dept Agric., Annapolis. p. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumble, J. T., and L. T. Kok. 1982. Integrated pest management techniques in thistle suppression in pastures of North America. Weed Res. 22: 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. E., and J. C. Herr. 1996. Impact of Rhinocyllus conicus on a non-target, rare, native thistle (Cirsium fontinale) in California. In Proc. 9th Intl. Sym. on Biological Control of Weeds, January 19–26, 1996, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Univ. Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. E., R. W. Pemberton, and S. S. Rosenthal. 1987. Host utilization of Cirsium thistles (Asteraceae) by the introduced weevil Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California. Environ. Entomol. 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, B. H. 1983. The consequences of predation in the population biology of the monocarpic species Cirsium palustre and Cisium vulgare. Oecologia 58: 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. H., R. L. Pienkowski, and L. T. Kok. 1974. Host specificity of the first-instar of Ceuthorhynchidius horridus, a weevil for biological control of thistles. J. Econ. Entomol. 67: 735–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn, T. L. 1996. Interspecific competition between Rhinocyllus conicus and Urophora solstitialis, two biocontrol agents released in Australia against Carduus nutans. Zn V. C. Moran and J. H. Hoffmann (eds.), Proc. 9th Intl. Sym. on Biological Control of Weeds. Univ. Capetown, Stellenbosch, South Africa. p. 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer, H. 1967. The host-range, distribution and life-history of Rhinocyllus conicus Froel. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Control Prog. Rpt. 18: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer, H., and M. Preiss. 1983. Host selection and oviposition behaviour in West-European ecotypes of Rhinocyllus conicus Froel. (Col., Curculionidae). Z. angew. Ent. 95: 133–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA

    James R. Nechols

Authors
  1. James R. Nechols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. USDA-ARS Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hawaii, USA

    Peter A. Follett

  2. University of Hawaii, USA

    Jian J. Duan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nechols, J.R. (2000). Biological Control of Musk Thistle: A Reassessment. In: Follett, P.A., Duan, J.J. (eds) Nontarget Effects of Biological Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4577-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7067-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4577-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation