Action Learning in Leadership for Change: Partnership, Pedagogy, and Projects for Responsible Management Development

  • Sandra A. Waddock
  • Eve Spangler
Part of the Outreach Scholarship book series (OUTR, volume 4)

Abstract

A number of years ago several sociology and management faculty at Boston College came together to develop a joint executive education program with two main objectives: to promote social responsibility in business and to employ an action-learning pedagogy appropriate to adult, work-based learning. The integration of these two objectives occurred primarily through major projects undertaken by participants within their employing organizations. These projects had to define (when necessary), develop, and implement business practices that optimized both conventional economic returns and social returns for at least one of the sponsoring organization’s many stakeholders: employees, customers, suppliers, neighbors, or the environment. The program was initially called Leadership for the Common Good and later re-named Leadership for Change (LC).

Keywords

Marketing Assure Dispatch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, Carl (1997). Values-based management. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4): 25–46.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, Chris (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bilimoria, Diana (1998). From classroom learning to real-world learning: A diasporic shift in management education. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), June, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
  5. Evians, R. W. (1983). The validation of action learning programmes. Management Education and Development, 14, 208–211.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, D., & Torbert, W.R. (1995). Personal and Organizational Transformations: The True Challenge of Continual Quality Improvement. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993). Re-Engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  9. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to androgogy. Chicago: Association Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kolb, D. & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of Group Process (pp. 33–57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Liedtka, (1998). Constructing an ethic for business practice: competing effectively and doing good. Business and Society, 37(3), September, 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nonaka, I.(1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, February, 5(1),14–37.Google Scholar
  14. Raiborn, C. & Payne, D. (1996). TQM: just what the ethicist ordered. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 963–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raelin, Joseph A. (1997). A model of work-based learning. Organization Science, 8(6), Nov.-Dec, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schön, Donald (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Senge, P.M. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Stacey, R. D. (1991). The chaos frontier: Creative strategic control for business. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Stacey, R.D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Waddock, S. A. & Graves, S.B. (1997a). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waddock, S. A. & Graves, S.B. (1997b). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous? Business and Society, 36(3), 250–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilbur, K.. (1998). The eye of spirit: An integral vision for a world gone slightly mad. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra A. Waddock
    • 1
  • Eve Spangler
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations