Moral Hazard in Banking: The Recent Argentine Experience

  • Guillermo J. Escudé

Abstract

Government regulated deposit safety nets, whether explicit or implicit, should be seen first and foremost as a means towards protecting the public from market imperfections. Because of information asymmetry, depositors do not know the quality (that is, the risk) of the deposit service provided by financial institutions. Apart from this direct rationale for deposit safety nets there is another, more indirect rationale. Bank runs and, especially, bank panics may affect the public at large due to the negative externalities that they can generate. A deposit safety net may prevent depositors from triggering such runs and panics if it makes them feel sufficiently protected.

Keywords

Covariance Assure Argentina Volatility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, Sudipto, Arnoud W. A. Boot, and Anjan V. Thakor, 1998, “The economics of bank regulation,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 30, No. 4, November, pp. 745–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diaz Alejandro, Carlos, 1985, “Good-bye financial repression, hello financial crash,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Escudé, Guillermo J., 1999, “El Indicador de Riesgo Crediticio de Argentina dentro de un enfoque de teoria de carteras de la exigencia de capital por riesgo crediticio,” Banco Central de la República Argentina, working paper, No. 8.Google Scholar
  4. Rochet, Jean-Charles, 1992, “Capital requirements and the behaviour of commercial banks,” European Economic Review, Vol. 36, pp. 1137–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillermo J. Escudé
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Bank of ArgentinaUSA

Personalised recommendations