High Voltage in Superconducting Power Equipment — Prospects and Limits

  • J. Gerhold
Chapter

Abstract

Superconductivity offers a unique feature for heavy current flow, and strong magnetic fields. However, the Poynting vector which is the cross product of the magnetic field and the electrical stress is comprised within the insulating space. This fact enlightens the significance of a matching insulation design. Some insulators show fascinating intrinsic properties and may suggest the use of high dielectric stress, but the variety of applicable insulants is limited at low temperatures. Solids suffer from the thermomechanical mismatch against conductors. Cryogenic liquids can easily be vaporized unless a high pressure is maintained. Vacuum may be affected by leakage, and by strong magnetic fields. No “Superdielectric” does exist in practice. Hence, applicable dielectric stress may be as usual in conventional electrotechnique, but very high voltages are hard to apply. Medium high voltages seems to be much more adequate. Quite on the contrary of a quench which may be handled via a controlled discharge, a failure of the insulation system normally ends in a disaster. The design challenge is to guarantee an almost zero failure risk without relying on an excessive safety margin.

Keywords

Anisotropy Helium Polyethylene Epoxy Brittleness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.D. Appleton, An introduction to the power applications of superconductivity, in: Handbook of Applied Superconductivity, Vol.2/part H1 (ed. B. Seeber); Institute of Physics, Bristol/UK (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Electrial insulation in HTS power cables, fault current limiters and transformers, final report of CIGRE SC15TF1, ELECTRA no. 186,1999Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.G. Garlick, Power system applications of high temperature superconductors, Cryogenics 37 (1997), 649–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Hara and J. Gerhold, Electrical insulation specification and design method for superconducting power equipment, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Ishii, Review of the electrical insulation of superconducting generators, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1155–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.W. Schwenterly, High-voltage testing of superconducting power apparatus, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1115–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.B. Forsyth, The dielectric insulation of superconducting power cables, Proc. IEEE 79 (1991), 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Gerhold, Dielectric properties, in: Handbook of Applied Superconductivity, Vol.1/part F (ed. B. Seeber); Institute of Physics, Bristol/UK (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Gerhold, Properties of cryogenic insulants, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1063–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.W. Sillars. “Electrical Insulating Materials and their Applications,” Peter Peregrinus, Stevenage/UK (1973)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.K. Nelson, Some steps toward the automation of the design of composite dielectric structures, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 1 (1994), 663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Satow, Specifications and performance experience of pool boiling cooled magnets, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Kosaki, M. Nagao, N. Shimizu, and Y. Mizuno, Solid insulation and its deterioration, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1095–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Okubo, H. Goshima, N. Hayakawa, and M. Hikita, High voltage insulation of superconducting power apparatus, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Graz, Austria (1995), 9007/1-12Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Hara and H. Okubo, Electrical insulation characteristics of superconducting power apparatus, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.W. Brown, The Weibull distributions: some dangers with its use in insulation studies, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-101 (1982), 3513–3522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Nishijima and M. Hara, Mechanical influence on long-term dielectric performance of insulants, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1105–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Gerhold, M. Hubmann, and E. Telser, Breakdown probability and size effect in liquid helium, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 5 (1998), 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Mitsui, Review of the research and development for insulation of scuperconducting fault current limiters, Cryogenics 38 (1998), 1159–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Hayakawa, H. Sakakibara, H. Goshima et al., Breakdown mechanism of liquid nitrogen viewed from area and volume effects, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 4 (1997), 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Gerhold, Dielectric strength of gaseous and liquid insulants at low temperatures, CIGRE — Symposium, Vienna (1987) 100-01Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Darweschsad, G. Friesinger, R. Heller et al., “Development and test of the poloidal field prototype coil POLO at the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe”; Fusion Engineering and Design 36 (1997), 227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.J. Schönhuber, Breakdown of gases below Paschen minimum: basic design data of high-voltage equipment, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-88 (1969), 100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.W. Fast and H.L. Hart, Use of glass beads to increase the breakdown voltage in subatmospheric, cold helium gas, Adv. Cryog. Eng. 35 (1990), 809–812Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gerhold
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations