Skip to main content

Abstract

Discourse analysis can take understanding about information systems planning and development further than is possible with current approaches. The two added value items in this paper are those of ‘talk-as-action’ and social constructionism. Both are used to elaborate a structurationist view that values and ideas (those of the actor or agent) which appear in discourse early on in the case study become accepted as rules or as roles (the organizational structure) and which become resources for individuals (the actor or agent again) to use by the end of the case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris C., 1993, Knowledge for action, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C., and Schon D.A., 1978, Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective,Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J.L., 1962, How to do things with words,Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger P., and Luckmann T.L., 1966, The social construction of knowledge: a treatise on the sociology of knowledge,Doubleday, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M., 1973, Natural symbols, Pantheon Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D., 1997, Discourse and cognition, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H., 1967, Studies in ethnomethodology,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A., 1984, The constitution of society,University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant D., Keenoy T., and Oswick C., (eds), 1998, Discourse and organization, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage J.C., 1984, Gatfinkel and ethnomethodology,Polity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G., 1990, ‘Managing strategic change: the role of symbolic action’, British Journal of Management,1, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M., 1962, Phenomenology of perception, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon D.A., 1983, The reflective practitioner,Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz A., 1967, Collected papers, Nijhoff, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R., 1969, Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language,Cambridge University Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P.M., 1990, The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillince J.A.A. and Mouakket S., 1997, ‘Varieties of political process during systems development’, Information Systems Research,8, (3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck W.H., 1985, ‘Acting first and thinking later’, in Pennings 1.M., (ed) Organizational strategy and change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmacq A., and Sims D., 1998, ‘The struggle with sense’, 119–134 in Grant D., Keenoy T., and Oswick C., (eds), 1998, Discourse and organization, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M., 1947, The theory of social and economic organization (Henderson A.H. and Parsons T., eds and trans) Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., 1995, Sense-making in organizations,Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder D.L., 1974, Telling the code, in Turner R., (ed), Ethnomethodology,Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sillince, J.A.A., Harindranath, G. (1999). Using Discourse Analysis to Understand is Planning and Development in Organization: A Case Study. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S., Zupančič, J. (eds) Systems Development Methods for Databases, Enterprise Modeling, and Workflow Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4261-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4261-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6913-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4261-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics