Advertisement

Neuropsychological Assessment of the Criminal Defendant

The Significance of Cultural Factors
Chapter
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

Neuropsychologists are often asked to evaluate complex cases involving the neurobehavioral consequences of brain injury with numerous etiological and modulating considerations beyond the injury indicated in the referral. Though many of these patients have sustained a serious compromise in their intellectual, behavioral, and cognitive functioning, the magnitude of their impairment and its relationship to their disability is often difficult to ascertain. Examining patients in a forensic context is even more challenging given the myriad of variables that potentially affect the assessment process. Moreover, specific modulating factors such as low motivation, low education, nonorganic or functional disturbances, concurrent medical disorders (e.g., hypertension, pulmonary, cardiovascular disease), socioeconomic status, cultural and/or ethnic influences, and a history of chemical dependency can further complicate this complex differential diagnostic process (Lezak, 1995; Sbordone, 1991; Strickland et al., 1993).

Keywords

Executive Function Antisocial Behavior Neuropsychological Test Neuropsychological Assessment Criminal Defendant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Arlien-Soborg, P., Bruhn, P., Gyldensted, C., & Melgaard, B. (1979). Chronic Painter’s syndrome. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 60, 149–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkley, R., Grodzinsky, G., & DuPaul, G.J. (1992). Frontal lobe functions and attention-deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: A review and research report. Journal of Abnormal Clinical Psychology, 20, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumer, D., & Benson, D. F. (1975). Personality changes with frontal and temporal lobe lesions. In D. F. Benson & D. Blumer (Eds.), Psychiatric aspects of neurologic disease (pp. 151–170). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, J., & Pilisuk, M. (1976). Differences in the provision of mental health services by race. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 46, 510–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornell, D. G., & Hawk, G. L. (1988, August). Malingerers diagnosed in pretrial evaluations: Clinical presentations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  7. Cripe, L. I. (1996). The ecological validity of executive function testing. In R. J. Sbordone & C. J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (pp. 171–202). Delray Beach: GR/St. Lucie.Google Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Cummings, J. L. (1985). Clinical neuropsychiatry. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  10. Cummings, J. L. (1995). Anatomic and behavioral aspects of frontal-subcortical circuits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummings, J. L., Gosenfeld, L. F., Houlihan, J. P., & McCaffrey, T. (1983). Neuropsychiatric disturbances associated with idiopathic calcification of the basal ganglia. Biological Psychiatry, 18, 591–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings, J. L., & Mendez, M. F. (1984). Secondary mania with focal cerebrovascular lesions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 1084–1087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. R. (1985). The Frontal Lobes. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 339–375). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Golden, C. J., & Grier, C. A. (1998). Detecting malingering on the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 133–162). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  15. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  16. Hartman, D. E. (1995). Neuropsychological toxicology. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins, K. A. (1990). Occupational neurotoxicology: Some neuropsychological issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 664–680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Jr., Lehman, R. A., & Vogts, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 892–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, K. M., & Poland, R. (1994). Ethnic differences in the response to psychotropic drugs. In S. Friedman (Ed.), Anxiety disorders in African Americans (pp. 203–204). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Mattson, A. J., & Levin, H. S. (1990). Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 178, 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKinzey, R. K., Podd, M. H., Krehbiel, M. A., Mensch, A. J., & Trombka, C. C. (1997). Detection of malingering on the LNNB: An initial and cross validation. Archives of Clinical and Neuropsychology, 12, 505–512.Google Scholar
  23. Mesulam, M. M. (1986). Frontal cortex and behavior: Editorial. Annals of Neurology, 19, 320–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, R. G., Rushe, T., Woodruff, P. W. R., & Murray, R. M. (1995). Problem solving in schizophrenia: A specific deficit in planning ability. Schizophrenia Research, 14, 235–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moscovich, M. (1982). Multiple dissociations of function in amnesia. In L. Cermack (Ed.), Human memory and amnesia (pp. 337–370). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Narrow, W. E., Reiger, D. A., Rae, D. S., Manderscheid, R. W., & Locke, B. Z. (1993). Use of services by persons with mental and addictive disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 95–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pankratz, L. (1979). Symptom validity testing and symptom retraining: Procedures for the assessment and treatment of functioning sensory deficits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 409–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reitan, R. J., & Wolfson, D. (1998). Detection of malingering and invalid test results using the Halstead-Reitan Battery. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 163–208). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, R. (1986). Malingering and deception. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Conducting insanity evaluations (pp. 61–76). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, R. (1988). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, R. (1990a). Development of a new classificatory model of malingering. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 18, 323–333.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, R. (1990b). Models of feigned mental illness. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sbordone, R. J. (2000). The executive functions of the brain. In G. Groth-Marnat (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in clinical practice: A practical guide to test interpretation and integration (pp. 437–456). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Sbordone, R. J., & Guilmette, T. J. (1999). Ecological validity: Prediction of everyday and vocational functioning from neuropsychological test data. In J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice (pp. 227–254). Royersford, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  35. Sbordone, R. J., & Purisch, A. D. (1996). Hazards of blind analysis of neuropsychological test data in assessing cognitive disability: The role of confounding factors. Neurorehabilitation, 7, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slick, D., Hopp, G., Strauss, E., & Thompson, G. B. (1997). Victoria Symptom Validity Test, Version 1.0: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  37. Strickland, T. L., Mena, I., Villanueva-Meyer, J., Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mehringer, C. M., Satz, P., & Myers, H. (1993). Cerebral perfusion and neuropsychological consequences of chronic cocaine use. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 5, 419–427.Google Scholar
  38. Strickland, T. L., & Stein, R. (1995). Cocaine-induced cerebrovascular impairment: Challenges to neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychology Review, 5(1), 69–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strickland, T. L., Jenkins, J.O., Myers, H. F., & Adams, H. E. (1998). Diagnostic judgments as a function of client and therapist race. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  41. Sue, S., McKinney, H., Allen, D., & Hall, J. (1974). Delivery of community mental health services to black and white clients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 241–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsushima, W. T., & Towne, W. S. (1977). Effects of paint sniffing on neuropsychological test performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 402–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IrvineUSA
  2. 2.Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and ScienceLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.UCLA School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations