Biocontrol of Plant Diseases for Agricultural Sustainability

  • C. S. Nautiyal

Abstract

High input agriculture is increasingly recognised as environment and health degrading and not profitable due to its dependence on chemical inputs. Green revolution in India during 1970s no doubt brought about self sufficiency in food and millions escaped starvation. There is serious concern for food security of developing countries including that of India for the following reasons as described by Khanna-Chopra and Sinha (1998): (i) Increasing food demand for the rapidly burgeoning population which will be further enhanced due to improved economic growth, (ii) stagnating or declining productivity in high productivity regions, often described as “Green Revolution” fatigue, and (iii) Increasing vulnerability to agriculture as a result of potential climate change. Moreover. major advances in development in general and agricultural production in particular have also brought in its wake serious environmental degradation in term of salinity, water logging, soil erosion, air and water pollution and poor soil health. Therefore, there is a conscious effort to improve production through use of environment friendly products such as bioinoculants, instead of chemicals. This may ensure that the nature is not exploited in the production process but is instead harmonised so that the entropy of the environment decreases and sustainability in agricultural production is promoted (Narain, 1998; Purohit, 1995; Sinha, 1996, 1997).

Keywords

Entropy Fatigue Maize Proline Bacillus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bashan, Y. 1986, Enhancement of wheat root colonisation and plant development by Azospirillum brasiliense Cd. following temporary depression of rhizosphere microflora, Appl. Environ Microbiol. 51: 1067–1071.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Britto de Oliveira, R. G., Wolters, A. C. and van Elsas, J. D. 1995, Effects of antibiotics in soil on the population dynamics of transposon Tn5 carrying Pseudomonas fluorescens, Plant Soil 175: 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, R. J. 1991, Success with biological control requires new thinking by industry, Counterpoint, Impact AgBioBusines.s,. Oxon, UK (CAB Int. June) pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, R.J. 1993, Making greater use of introduced microorganisms for biological control of plant pathogens, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 31: 53–80.Google Scholar
  5. de Selincourt, K. 1996, Intensifying agriculture-the organic way, The Ecologist 26: 271–272.Google Scholar
  6. Devliegher, W., Arif, M. A. S. and Verstaete, W. 1995, Survival and plant growth promotion of detergent-adapted Pseudomonas fluorescens ANP15 and Pseudomonas fluorescens 7NSK2, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3865–3871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hellriegel, H. 1886, Welche stickstoffquellen stehen der Pflanze zu Gebote? Tageblatt der 59 Versammlung Detscher Naturforcher und Aerzte in Berlin, 18–24, Sept., p. 290.Google Scholar
  8. Johri, B. N., Rao, C. V. S. and Goel, R. 1997, Fluorescent pseudomonads in plant disease management, In: Biotechnological Approaches in Soil Microorganisms for Sustainable Crop Production ed. K. R. Dadarwal, Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.Google Scholar
  9. Khanna-Chopra, R. and Sinha, S. K. 1998, Prospects of success of biotechnological approaches for improving tolerance to drought stress in crop plants, Curr. Sci. 74: 25–34.Google Scholar
  10. Lam, S. T. and Gaffney, T. D. 1993, Biological activities of bacteria used in plant pathogen control, in: Biotechnology in Plant Disease Control ed. I. Chet, Wiley-Liss Press, New York, pp. 291–320.Google Scholar
  11. Lam, S.T., Torkewitz, N.R., Nautiyal, C.S. and Dion, P. 1997, Microorganisms with mannopine catabolizing ability, United States of America Patent Number 5,610, 044.Google Scholar
  12. Li, D.M. and Alexander, M. 1990, Factors affecting co-inoculation with antibiotic-producing bacteria to enhance rhizobial colonisation and nodulation, Plant Soil 129: 195–201.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, L. W. 1979, Practical use and success of Agrobacterium radiobacter strain 84 for crown gall control, In: Soil-borne Plant Pathogens eds, B. Schippers and W. Gams, Academic Press, London, pp. 553–568.Google Scholar
  14. Mukerji, K.G. and Garg, K.L. (eds.), 1988a, Biocontrol of Plant Disease, Vol. I, CRC Press inc., Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Mukerji, K.G. and Garg, K.L. (eds.) 1988b, Biocontrol of Plant Disease, Vol. II, CRC Press Inc., Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Mukerji, K.G., Chamola, B.P. and Upadhyay, R.K. (eds.) 1999, Biotechnological Approaches in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Mukerji, K.G., Tewari, J.P., Arora, D.K. and Saxena, G. (eds.) 1992, Recent Development in Biocontrol of Plant Diseases Aditya Books Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  18. Narain, P. 1998, A dialectical perspective of agricultural research for sustainable development, Curr. Sci. 74: 663–665.Google Scholar
  19. Nautiyal, C.S. and Dion, P. 1990, Characterisation of opine-utilizing microflora associated with samples of soil and plants, Appl. Environ. Microbio!. 56: 2576–2579.Google Scholar
  20. Nautiyal, C. S. 1997a, A method for selection and characterisation of rhizosphere competent bacteria of chickpea, Curr. Microbiol. 34: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nautiyal, C. S. 1997b, Selection of Chickpea-Rhizosphere Competent Pseudomonas fluorescens NBRI 1303, Antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, Rhizoctonia bataticola and Pythium sp., Curr. Microbiol. 35: 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nautiyal, C. S. 1997e, Rhizosphere competence of Pseudomonas sp. NBRI9926 and Rhizobium sp. NBRi9513 involved in the suppression of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) pathogenic fungi, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 23: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Connell, K. P., Goodman, R. M. and Handelsman, J. 1996, Engineering the rhizosphere expressing a bias, Trends Biotechnol. 14: 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oger, P., Petit, A. and Dessaux, Y. 1997, Genetically engineered plants producing opines alter their biological environment, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15: 369–372.Google Scholar
  25. O’Sullivan, D. J. and O’Gara, F. 1992, Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens, Microbiol. Rev. 56: 662–676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Paroda, R.S. 1997, Foreword, In: Biotechnological Approaches in Soil Microorganisms for Sustainable Crop Production ed., K. R. Dadarwal, Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur,lndia.Google Scholar
  27. Purohit, A. N. 1995, The Murmuring Man Bisen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh Publishers, Dehradun, U.P. India.Google Scholar
  28. Savka, M. A. and Farrand, S. K. 1997, Modification of rhizobacterial populations by engineering bacterium utilisation of a novel plant-produced resource, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15: 363–368.Google Scholar
  29. Schroth, M. N. and Hancock, J. G. 1982, Diseases suppresive soil and root colonising bacteria, Science 216: 1376–1381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinha, S. K. 1996, Food security in 2020 and beyond-Will developing countries be dependent on the developed world? Curr. Sci. 71: 732–734.Google Scholar
  31. Sinha, S. K. 1997, Global change scenario: Current and future with reference to land cover changes and sustainable agriculture-South and South-East asian context, Curr. Sci. 72: 846–854.Google Scholar
  32. Swaminathan, M.S. 1992, Biodiversity and Biotechnology, In: Biodiversity and Global Food Security eds. M.S. Swaminathan and S. Jana, MacMillan India Ltd., Chennai, India.Google Scholar
  33. Swaminathan, M.S. 1996, Biotechnology - biovillages and a better biofuture, In: Trends in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology eds. S. Srivastava, P.S. Srivastava and B.N. Tiwari, CBS Publications and Distributors, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, V.G. and Kevan, P.G. 1993, Basic principales of agroecology and sustainable agriculture, J Agric. Environ. Ethics 6: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Upadhyay, R.K., Mukerji, K.G. and Rajak, R.L.(eds.) 1996, IPM System in Agriculture Vol. II, Biocontrol in Emerging Biotechnology Aditya Books Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  36. van Elsas, J. D. and van Overbeek, L. S. 1993, Bacterial responses to soil stimuli, In: Starvation in Bacteria ed. S. Kjellebrg, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar
  37. van Elsas, J. D. and van Overbeek, L. S. 1995, Root exudate induced promoter activity in Pseudomonas fluorescens mutants in the wheat rhizosphere, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 890–898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. van Overbeek, L. S., van Veen J. A. and van Elsas, J. D. 1997, Induced reporter gene activity, enhanced stress resistance, and competitive ability of a genetically modified Pseudomonas fluorescens strain released into a field plot planted with wheat, Appl. Environ. Microbial. 63: 1965–1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. Nautiyal
    • 1
  1. 1.Microbiology GroupNational Botanical Research InstituteLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations