Managing Urban Ecosystems A Look to the Future of Urban Forestry

  • L. Robert Neville


Near the close of the 19th century the American conservation community, led by Gifford Pinchot, was discussing the need for scientific management of forests and related natural resources. The primary concerns at that time were destructive and wasteful timber-harvesting practices and the need for a sustained yield policy (Pinchot, 1947). Urbanization was not an issue. Nineteenth-century cities were very compact in form due to the constraints of transportation and access. It is understandable, therefore, that urban growth was not perceived by Pinchot as a threat to the long-term viability and productivity of forests. Now, in retrospect, as we approach a new millennium, it has become obvious that a century of unparalleled population growth and urbanization has had an extremely detrimental impact on the natural systems and processes that sustain life on this planet. Forests in the heavily populated regions of the Northeast have been decimated and in many places can no longer maintain their functional efficiency in stabilizing soil, purifying water and air, and sustaining biological diversity.


Urban Forest Ecosystem Structure Community Forestry Ecological Unit Ecological Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W., 1993, Toward a Unified Ecology, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Borman, F. H., and Likens, G., 1979, Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brush, G. S., 1995, History and Impact of Human Activities on Chesapeake Bay, unpublished manuscript prepared for the Renewable Natural Resources Foundation, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  4. Chesapeake Bay Monitoring Subcommittee, 1989, The State of the Chesapeake Bay: Third Biennial Monitoring Report-1989, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  5. Delleur, J. W., 1982, Introduction to urban hydrology and stormwater management, in Urban Stormwater Hydrology, Water resources monograph 7, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Ecological Society of America, Ad Hoc Committee on Ecosystem Management, 1995, The Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management: An Assessment by the Ecological Society of America, Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC. Prepublication copy.Google Scholar
  7. ECOMAP, 1993, National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Girardet, H., 1992, The Gaia Atlas of Cities: New Directions for Sustainable Urban Living, Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Haber, W., 1990, Basic concepts of landscape ecology and their application in land management, Physiol. Ecol. Japan 27(Special Number): 131–146.Google Scholar
  10. Hamill, Jr., S. M., Keene, J. C., Kinsey, D. N., Lewis, R. K., 1989, The Growth Management Handbook: A Primer for Citizen and Government Planners, Middlesex, Somerset, Mercer Regional Council, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Harms, B., Knappen, J. P., and Rademakers, J. G., 1993, Landscape planning for nature restoration: Comparing regional scenarios, in Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment (C. C. Vos and P. Opdam, eds.), Chap-man and Hall, London. pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
  12. Kaufmann, M. R., Graham, R. T.,Boyce, Jr., D. A. et al., 1994, An Ecological Basis for Ecosystem Management, Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-246, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  13. Laurie, M., 1986, An Introduction to Landscape Architecture, 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Lazaro, T. R., 1979, Urban hydrology, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  15. McDonnell, M. J., and Pickett, S. T. A., 1990, Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology, Ecology 71:1232–1237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D. J., and Rowntree, R. A., 1994, Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA.Google Scholar
  17. Morris Arboretum, 1994, An ecosystem-based approach to urban and community forestry: An ecosystem manager’s workbook, Unpublished manuscript, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Neville, L. R., 1996, Urban watershed management: the role of vegetation, Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  19. New Jersey State Planning Committee, 1992, The New Jersey state development and redevelopment plan, Trenton. Pinchot, G., 1947, Breaking New Ground, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Saunders, R. A., and Rowntree, R. A., 1983, Classification of American metropolitan areas by ecoregion and potential natural vegetation, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service research paper, NE-516, Broomall, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  21. Swanson, A. P., 1992, Growth management efforts in the Chesapeake Bay region, Unpublished paper, Chesapeake Executive Council, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  22. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 1992, New York—New Jersey Highlands Regional Study, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1983, Chesapeake Bay: A Framework for Action, Region 3, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. Van Buuren, M., and Kerkstra, K., 1993, The framework concept and the hydrological landscape structure: A new perspective in the design of multifunctional landscapes, in Landscape ecology of a stressed environment. (C. C. Vos and P. Opdam eds.), Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vos, C. C., and Opdam, P., (eds.), 1993, Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  26. Vos, C. C., and Zonneveld, J. I. S., 1993, Patterns and processes in a landscape under stress: The study area, in Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. (C. C. Vos and P. Opdam, eds.), Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walton, G. F., 1987, Watershed management strategies for the state of New Jersey, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station publication, H-17505–1–87, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  28. Year 2020 Panel, 1988, Population growth and development in the Chesapeake Bay watershed to the Year 2020, Report to the Chesapeake Executive Council, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Robert Neville
    • 1
  1. 1.Wolfe Mason AssociatesHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations