Writing Research Proposals for Foundations

  • Dennis Drotar
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)

Abstract

Foundations are an important source of support for research as well as development of services for clinical child and pediatric populations. For the most part, the application process to foundations is much less involved and detailed than it is for government research grants. This is a clear advantage for a researchers. Nevertheless, several features of foundations make them less accessible to pediatric and clinical child psychologists than they need to be. Because there are such a large number of local and national foundations, it can be difficult for investigators to find out about foundations’ interests and priorities. Moreover, each foundation has somewhat different guidelines for the priority areas of the research they fund, as well as for the application and review process. The heterogeneous nature of foundations’ structures, procedures, and priorities also can make the application process a confusing one.

Keywords

Government Agency Site Visit Conduct Disorder Research Proposal Child Health Questionnaire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumgartner, J. E., Feczko, M. L., Hall, V., & Kovacs, R. (Eds). (1995). National guide to funding for children, youth and family (3rd ed.). New York: The Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, M. (1995). Winning grants step by step. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Drotar, D. (1995). Consulting with pediatricians. Psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Drotar, D., & Sturm, L. (1994). Psychological outcomes of preschool children with early histories of failure to thrive. In B. Stabler & L. Underwood (Eds.), Growth stature and adaptation, behavioral, social, and cognitive aspects of growth delay (pp. 221–232). Chapel Hill: Office of Continuing Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Eckstein, R. M. (1996). Directory of health grants. Loxahatches, FL: Research Grant Guides.Google Scholar
  6. Fine, T. (1996). Foundations and nonprofit research support. In H. A. Pincus (Ed.), Research funding and resource manual mental health and addictive disorders (pp. 127–233). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  7. Freeman, D. F. (1991). The handbook on private foundations. New York: The Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  8. Garonzik, E. (Eds.). (1985). The foundation grants index (13th ed.). New York: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, A. J., & Bowe, F. G. (1995). Getting the most from federal information sources. In R. M. Eckstein (Ed.), Directory of grants for organizations servicing people with disabilities (9th ed., pp. 140–149). Loxahatches, FL: Research Grant Guide.Google Scholar
  10. Landgraf, J., Abetz, L., & Ware, J. E. (1996). Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A users manual (1st ed.). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
  11. McIlnay, D. P. (1998). How foundations work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. National Network of Grantmakers. (1997a). Common grant application. 1717 Kettner Blvd., Suite 110, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  13. National Network of Grantmakers. (1997b). Grantmakers directory. 717 Kettner Blvd., Suite 110, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Drotar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsRainbow Babies and Children’s HospitalClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations