Learning to Produce Three-Syllable Words

A Longitudinal Study of Finnish Twins
  • Tuula Savinainen-Makkonen

Abstract

This paper examines the early phonology of a pair of twins acquiring Finnish with a primary focus on three-syllable words. First I will try to establish whether these Finnish twins attempt to produce three-syllable targets during the first words stage. Next I will try to identify how children produce three-syllable words in the early stages of phonological development. If structural reductions of the target words occur, it is interesting to see what factors affect the choice of the segments that are retained. How does word stress (which is always on the first syllable in Finnish) affect the process of reduction? It is also interesting to compare the twin siblings with each other: are there differences between them?

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Vihman, M.M., Roug-Hellichius, L., Durand, C., Landberg, I., & Arao, F. (1992). Material evidence of infant selection from target language: A cross-linguistic phonetic study. In C.A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological Development: Models, research, implications. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Grunwell, P. (1987). Clinical Phonology. 2. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 49–64.Google Scholar
  4. Ingram, D. (1978). The role of the syllable in phonological development. In A. Bell, & J.B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 143–155). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  5. Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological Disabilities in Children. 2. London, Jersey City: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, J.S., Lewis, L.B., & Hogan, J.C. (1997). A production limitation in syllable number: a longitudinal study of one child’s early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 14,327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laalo, K. (1994). Kaksitavuvaihe lapses kielen kehityksessä (The two-syllable stage on language acquisition). Virittajä, 98, 430–448.Google Scholar
  8. Leonard, L.B., Newhoff, M., & Mesalam, L. (1980). Individual differences in early child phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, I,7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Linell, P., & Jennische, M. (1980). Barns Uttalsutveckling (Speech Development of Children). Lund: Liber Läromedel.Google Scholar
  10. Macken, M. (1995). Phonological acquisition. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 671–696). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Malmstrom, P., & Silva, M. (1986). Twin talk: manifestation of twin status in the speech of toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 13, 293–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McEvoy, S., & Dodd, B. (1992). The communication abilities of 2- to 4-year-old twins. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 27, 73–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matheny, A.P., & Bruggemann, C. (1972). Articulation proficiency in twins and singletons from families of twins. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 845–851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38,1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reynell, J., & Huntley, M. (1987). Reynell Developmental Language Scales Manual. 1987 Edition. Windsor: NFER-NELSON Publishing Company Ltd. (Manual first published Reynell, J. 1977; revised edition Reynell, J., & Huntley, M. 1985).Google Scholar
  16. Räisänen,A.1975.Havaintoja lapsenkielestä(Observations on child language)Virittlijti79 3,251–264Google Scholar
  17. SaviéS.(1980).How twins learn to talk.London:Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (1996). Lapsenkielen fonologia systemaattisen kehityksen kaudella (The phonology of child language during the period of systemic development). Unpublished licentiate thesis. Department of Phonetics, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  19. Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (1997). Learning to produce long words. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘87 conference on Language Acquisition (pp. 268–271). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  20. Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J.A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tomasello, M., Mannle, S., & Kruger, A. (1986). Linguistic environment of 1–2-year-old twins. Developmental Psychology, 22, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vihman, M.M. (1991). Ontogeny of phonetic gestures: Speech production. In I.G. Mattingly, & M. StuddertKennedy (Eds.), Modularity and Motor Theory of Speech Perception: Proceedings of a conference to honor Alvin M. Liberman (pp. 69–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Wijnen, F., Krikhaar, E., & Den Os, E. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children’s utterances: Evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language, 21,59–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zazzo, R. (1960). Les Jumeaux: le Couple et la Personne II; L’Individuation Pyschologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  25. Zlatié, L., MacNeilage, P.F., Matyear, C., & Davis, B. (1997). Babbling of twins in a bilingual environment.Applied Psycholinguistics 18(4) 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuula Savinainen-Makkonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhoneticsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations