Multiblock Dispersion Modelling for Urban and Regional Scale Interactions

  • Clemens Mensink
  • Koen De Ridder


One of the challenges in regional scale air quality modelling is to represent the distribution of pollutant concentrations more accurately at locations where this is required, e.g. in urban areas, near concentrated emission sources, near strong gradients in the concentration field or in an area of particular interest, as defined by the user. A more detailed computation of concentration distributions is also needed when model results are compared with measurements from monitoring stations at locations corresponding with fixed points in the computational domain.


Grid Refinement Advection Scheme Finite Volume Discretisation Order Upwind Scheme Flux Correct Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blom, J.G. and Verwer, J.G., 1993, VLUGR2: A vectorized local uniform grid refinement code for PDE’s in 2D, CWI report NM-R9306, CWI, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Bott, A., 1989, A positive definite advection scheme obtained by non-linear renormalization of advective fluxes, Monthly Weather Review, 117:1006–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jakobs H. J., Feldmann, H., Hass H. and Memmesheimer, M., 1995, The use of nested models for air pollution studies: an application of the EURAD modell to a SANA episode, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34:1301–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kunz. R. and Moussiopoulos, N., 1997, Implementation and assessment of a one-way nesting technique for high resolution wind flow simulations, Atmospheric Environment, 31:3167–3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Loon, M. van, 1996, Numerical methods in smog prediction, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Mensink, C. and Dumont, G., 1996, A critical evaluation and comparison of 6 European models for regional scale appliations, in: Proc. EUROTRAC’ 96, Vol 1:559–564, P.M. Borell, P. Borell, T. Cvitas, K. Kelly, and W. Seiler, W. eds., Computer Mechanics Publications, Southampton.Google Scholar
  7. Mensink, C., 1996, Numerical prediction of periodic vortex shedding in subsonic and transonic turbine cascade flows, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 22:881–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mensink, C. and Deconinck, H., 1992, A 2D parallel multiblock Navier-Stokes solver with applications on shared and distributed memory machines, in: Computational Fluid Dynamics’ 92, Vol 2:913–920, Ch. Hirsch et al. eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Roe, P. L., 1981, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 43:357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Syrakov D., Andreev, V. and Valkov N., eds., 1995, EMEP MSC-E, Bulgarian contribution, Annual report 1994, EMEP MSC-E, Sofia-Moscow.Google Scholar
  11. Tomlin A., Berzins M., Ware J., Smith, J. and Pilling, M.J., 1997, On the use of adaptive gridding methods for modelling chemical transport from multi-scale sources, Atmospheric Environment, 31:2945–2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Talat Odman, M., 1997, A quantitative analysis of numerical diffusion introduced by advection algorithms in air quality models, Atmospheric Environment, 31:1933–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Leer, B., 1973, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monotonicity. Lecture notes in Physics, 18:163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clemens Mensink
    • 1
  • Koen De Ridder
    • 1
  1. 1.VITO, Centre for Remote Sensing and Atmospheric Processes (TAP)MolBelgium

Personalised recommendations