Abstract
As described in Chapter 1, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) emphasizes the reduction of demand to require fewer roadway facilities at peak hours. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) focuses on the implementation of relatively low cost, quickly established actions to obtain higher efficiency in moving people as opposed to vehicles. Some overlap in the meaning of these terms makes it advisable to specify the context when using them. The term TSM has been used previously to describe the subject of this chapter, and TDM is applied in most current programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Guide for the Design of High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities, Washington, D.C., 1992.
Batz, T. M., High-Occupancy Vehicle Treatment,Impact and Parameters, Report Number FHWA/NJ-86–017–7767, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1986.
Christiansen, Dennis L., High-Occupancy Vehicle System Development in the United States, A White Paper, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, December 1990.
Fuhs, Charles A., NCHRP Synthesis 185 Preferential Lane Treatment for High-Occupancy Vehicle, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Parson Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., Orange, CA, 1993.
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Guidelines for High-Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) Lanes, A Recommended Practice, Publication No. RP-017, Washington, D.C.: ITE, 1986.
Institute of Transportation Engineers, The Effectiveness of High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities, Washington, D.C.: ITE, 1986.
Fuhs, C. A.High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities: A Planning, Design, and Operation Manual, 189 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship, Parson Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York, NY, 1990.
Sosslau, A. B., A. B. Hassam, M. M. Carter, and G. V. Wickstrom, Travel Estimation Procedures for Quick Response to Urban Policy Issues, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 186, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1978.
Sosslau, A. B., A. B. Hassam, M. M. Carter, and G. V. Wickstrom, Quick-Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters, User’s Guide, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 187, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1978.
Parody, E., Predicting Travel Volumes for HOV Priority Techniques: A User’s Guide, Report No. FHWA-RD-82–0842, Charles River Associates for the Federal Highway Administration, Boston, MA, 1982.
Rothenberg, M. J., and D. R. Sandahl, Evaluation of Priority Treatments for Highway Occupancy Vehicles, Report No. FHWA-RD-80–2, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1981.
Southworth, E, and E. Westbrook. High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: Some Evidence of Their Recent Performance, Transportation Research Record 1081, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1986:31–39.
Scapinakis, Dimitris A., and May, Demand Estimation, Benefit Assessment and Evaluation of On-Freeway High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: Level II, Quick Response Analysis, Prepared for the California Department of Transportation by the Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, CA, 1989.
Turnbull, Katherine E, Robert Stokes, and Russell H. Henk, “Current Practices in Evaluating Freeway High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities,” Texas Transportation Institute, Presented at the Transportation Research Board 70th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 1991.
Turnbull, Katherine E, Robert Stokes, and Russell H. Henk, Study of Current and Planned High-Occupancy Vehicle Lane Use: Perfor- mance and Use, Report Number ORNL/T3–9847, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1985.
Ulberg, C., Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) Lanes, Report No. WA-RD-121.2, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1988.
Gilbert, Keith, Transportation Systems Management: Handbook of Manual Analysis Techniques for Transit Strategies (Dallas, Fort Worth), United States Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration Report No. TX-09–0045–81–1, Washington, D.C., 1981.
Highway Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 3rd edition, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
Leman, Christopher K., “Does HOV Lane Construction Really Clean the Air?” Newsline, Vol. 18, No. 3. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., September, 1992.
Jovanis, Paul, Taking a Look at General Purpose Lanes for HOV Use, Conference Workshop, Transportation Research Circular No. 409, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1992.
Institute of Transportation Engineers, A Toolbox for Alleviating Traffic Congestion, I.T.E., Washington, D.C., 1989.
Schoon, J. G., “Development of Simplified Screening Method for Investigating HOV Facilities Impacts,” Paper prepared for submission to Transportation Research Board for Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1997.
Bieberitz, John A., “The Effect of HOV Lanes in Reducing VMT—A Theoretical Discussion,” Transportation Research Board, Proceedings of Conference on HOV Facilities, Los Angeles, CA, June 1994.
Voorhees, A. M., and Associates, Handbook for Transportation System Management Planning—Volume 2, Handbook for Evaluation of Individual Transit-Related TSMActions, North Central Texas. Council of Governments, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schoon, J.G. (1996). Transportation Demand Management and HOV Projects. In: Transportation Systems and Service Policy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4076-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4076-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-07481-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4076-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive