Abstract
This chapter develops a contingent valuation method for estimating nonmarket, typically environmental goods. Economists usually ignore critically important issues in the application of the methods. These issues define a research agenda to be developed here for the application of the method for deriving meaningful value estimates for recreation, environmental, and other nonmarket goods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, G. M.; DeGroot, M. H.; and Marschak, J., 1964. Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method, Behavioral Science, 9, pp. 226–232.
Bentkover, J. D.; Covello, V. T.; and Mumpower, J., 1986. Benefit Assessment: The State of the Art. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, MA.
Burness, H. S. and Cummings, R. G., 1983. Valuing Alternatives for Managing Hazardous Wastes. In: Schulze, W. D.; Cummings, R. G.; and Brookshire, D. S., Methods Development in Measuring Benefits of Environmental Improvements, Vol. II, Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. CR808-893-01.
Cummings, R. G.; Brookshire, D. S.; and Schulze, W. D., 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Roman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.
Edwards, S. R and Anderson, G. D., 1987. Overlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations, Land Economics, 62(2), pp. 168–178.
Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. L., 1990. Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction, Journal of Economics and Environmental Management. Forthcoming.
Krutilla, J. V., 1967. Conservation Reconsidered, American Economic Review, 57, pp. 777–786.
Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. 1986. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods-The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Phillips, C. V. and Zeckhauser, R. J., 1989. Contingent Valuation of Damage to Natural Resources: How Accurate? How Appropriate? Toxics Law Reporter, pp. 520–529.
Rae, D., 1983. The Value to Visitors of Improving Visibility at Mesa Verde and Great Smoky National Parks. In: Rowe, R. D. and Chestnut, L. G. (Eds.), Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Rowe, R. D.; Dutton, R. A.; and Chestnut, L. G., 1985. The Value of Ground Water Protection. Unpublished Manuscript, Energy and Resource Consultants, Inc, Boulder, CO.
Schulze, W. D.; Cummings, R. G.; and Brookshire, D. S., 1983. Methods Development in Measuring Benefits of Environmental Improvements, Vol. II, Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. CR808-893-01.
Tolley, G. S. and Randall A. et al., 1983. Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States. Interim Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Final Report, 1985).
Weisbrod, B. A., 1964. Collective Consumption Services of Individual Consumption Goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, pp. 471–477.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burness, H.S., Cummings, R.G., Ganderton, P.T., Harrison, G.W. (1991). Valuing Environmental Goods: A Critical Appraisal of the State of the Art. In: Dinar, A., Zilberman, D. (eds) The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4028-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4028-1_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6801-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4028-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive