Advertisement

Light Sensitivity in Cones is Affected by the Feedback from Horizontal Cells

  • Josef Skrzypek

Abstract

We examined the effect of annular illumination on resetting of the I-R relation measured intracellularly in the tiger salamander cones. Our results suggest that peripheral illumination contributes to the cellular mechanism of adaptation. This is done by a neural network involving feedback synapse from horizontal cell to cones. The effect is to unsaturate the membrane potential of a fully hyperpolarized cone, by “instantaneously” shifting cone’s I-R curves along intensity axis to be in register with ambient light level of the periphery. An equivalent electrical circuit with three different transmembrane channels, (leakage, photocurrent and feedback) was used to model static behavior of a cone. SPICE simulation showed that interactions between feedback and the light sensitive conductance can shift the I-R curves along the intensity domain, provided that phototransduction mechanism is not saturated during maximally hyperpolarized light response.

Keywords

Outer Segment Horizontal Cell Light Adaptation Tiger Salamander Intensity Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nakatani, K., & Yau, K.W. (1988). Calcium and light adaptation in retinal rods and cones. Nature. 334, 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matthews, H.R., Murphy, R.L.W., Fain, G.L., & Lamb, T.D. ( 1988). Photorecep-tor light adaptation is mediated by cytoplasmic calcium concentration. Nature, 334, 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Normann, R.A. & Werblin, F.S. (1974). Control of retinal sensitivity. I. Light and dark-adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones. J. Physiol. 63, 37–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Witkovsky, P. (1980). Excitation and adaptation in a vertebrate retina. In “Current topics in eye research v.2”. 1–66, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Werblin, F.S. & Dowling, J.E. (1969). Organization of the retina of the mudpup-py, Necturus maculosus. H. Intracellular recording. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 315–338.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Pugh, E.N. & Altman, J. (1988). Role for calcium in adaptation. Nature 334, 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    Lasansky, A. & Vallerga, S. (1975). Horizontal cell responses in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. J. Physiol. 251, 145–165.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Skrzypek, J. Ph.D. Thesis. (1979). University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Skrzypek, J. & Werblin, F.S. (1983). Lateral interactions in absence of feedback to cones. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1007–1016.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Skrzypek, J. (1984). Electrical coupling between horizontal cell bodies in the tiger salamander retina. Vision Res. 24, 701–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    Skrzypek, J. & Werblin, F.S. (1978). All horizontal cells have center-surround antagonistic receptive fields. ARVO Abstr.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Kaneko, A. (1970). Physiological and morphological identification of of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J. Physiol. Lond. 207, 623–633.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Lasansky, A. (1981). Synaptic action mediating cone responses to annular illumination in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. J. Physiol. Lond. 310, 206–214.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Stewart, W. (1978). Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer. Cell. 14, 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    Naka, K.I. & Rushton, W.A.H. (1967). The generation and spread of S-potentials in fish (Cyprinidae) J. Physiol., 192, 437–461.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Vladimirescu A., Zhang K., Newton A.R., Pederson D.O., & Sangiovani-Vinccntellii, A. (1981). SPICE Version 2G Users Guide, EECS Dept., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Segev, I., Fleschman, J.W., Miller, J.P. & Bunow, B. (1985). Modeling the electrical properties of anatomically complex neurons using a network analysis program: passive membrane. Biol. Cyber. 53, 27–40MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 19.
    Attwell, D., Werblin, F.S. & Wilson, M. (1982a). The properties of single cones isolated from the tiger salamander retina. J. Physiol. 328, 259–283.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Yau, W.K. & Nakatani, K. (1984). Electrogenic Na-Ca exchange in retinal rod outer segments. Nature, Lond. 311, 661–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef Skrzypek
    • 1
  1. 1.Machine Perception Laboratory, Computer Science Department and CRUMP Institute of Medical EngineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations