Light Sensitivity in Cones is Affected by the Feedback from Horizontal Cells
We examined the effect of annular illumination on resetting of the I-R relation measured intracellularly in the tiger salamander cones. Our results suggest that peripheral illumination contributes to the cellular mechanism of adaptation. This is done by a neural network involving feedback synapse from horizontal cell to cones. The effect is to unsaturate the membrane potential of a fully hyperpolarized cone, by “instantaneously” shifting cone’s I-R curves along intensity axis to be in register with ambient light level of the periphery. An equivalent electrical circuit with three different transmembrane channels, (leakage, photocurrent and feedback) was used to model static behavior of a cone. SPICE simulation showed that interactions between feedback and the light sensitive conductance can shift the I-R curves along the intensity domain, provided that phototransduction mechanism is not saturated during maximally hyperpolarized light response.
KeywordsOuter Segment Horizontal Cell Light Adaptation Tiger Salamander Intensity Domain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Normann, R.A. & Werblin, F.S. (1974). Control of retinal sensitivity. I. Light and dark-adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones. J. Physiol. 63, 37–61.Google Scholar
- 4.Witkovsky, P. (1980). Excitation and adaptation in a vertebrate retina. In “Current topics in eye research v.2”. 1–66, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- 5.Werblin, F.S. & Dowling, J.E. (1969). Organization of the retina of the mudpup-py, Necturus maculosus. H. Intracellular recording. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 315–338.Google Scholar
- 8.Lasansky, A. & Vallerga, S. (1975). Horizontal cell responses in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. J. Physiol. 251, 145–165.Google Scholar
- 9.Skrzypek, J. Ph.D. Thesis. (1979). University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
- 10.Skrzypek, J. & Werblin, F.S. (1983). Lateral interactions in absence of feedback to cones. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1007–1016.Google Scholar
- 12.Skrzypek, J. & Werblin, F.S. (1978). All horizontal cells have center-surround antagonistic receptive fields. ARVO Abstr.Google Scholar
- 13.Kaneko, A. (1970). Physiological and morphological identification of of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J. Physiol. Lond. 207, 623–633.Google Scholar
- 14.Lasansky, A. (1981). Synaptic action mediating cone responses to annular illumination in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. J. Physiol. Lond. 310, 206–214.Google Scholar
- 16.Naka, K.I. & Rushton, W.A.H. (1967). The generation and spread of S-potentials in fish (Cyprinidae) J. Physiol., 192, 437–461.Google Scholar
- 17.Vladimirescu A., Zhang K., Newton A.R., Pederson D.O., & Sangiovani-Vinccntellii, A. (1981). SPICE Version 2G Users Guide, EECS Dept., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- 19.Attwell, D., Werblin, F.S. & Wilson, M. (1982a). The properties of single cones isolated from the tiger salamander retina. J. Physiol. 328, 259–283.Google Scholar