Abstract
Continuity is provided in the construction of prestressed concrete buildings, bridges, and other structures for the same basic reasons that it is used with other materials, including savings in construction materials and reductions in construction costs. Of perhaps greater importance are the advantages of improved performance under service and design loads as a result of smaller deflections, increased redundancy, and, in some cases, improved performance under dynamic loads. Because these benefits are approximately the same for structural elements made with prestressed concrete and those made with other materials used in comparable applications, they will not be discussed in detail in this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ACI Committee 318. 1989. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Detroit. American Concrete Institute.
Guyon, Y. 1956. The Strength of Statically Indeterminate Prestressed Concrete Structures. Proc of a Symposium on the Strength of Concrete Structures. 305.
Ketchum, M. A. 1986. Redistribution of Stresses in Segmentally Erected Prestressed Concrete Bridges. Report No. UCB/SESM-86107. Berkeley. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California.
Saeed-Un-Din, K. 1958. The Effect of Creep upon Redundant Reactions in Continuous Prestressed Concrete Beams, Magazine of Concrete Research 10(109).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Libby, J.R. (1990). Flexural Continuity. In: Modern Prestressed Concrete. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3918-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3918-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6747-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3918-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive