Are the Product and the Package Compatible?
A 12: Far too frequently little thought is given to the suitability of a package as it relates to the product it is meant to contain. Many questions have dealt with the effect of the package on the product. It is only appropriate to consider the potential effect of the product on the package itself.
KeywordsPackaging Material Weeks Storage Seal Failure Package Compatible Luncheon Meat
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anon. 1988. Resealability reigns in flexibles. Packaging Digest 25 (4): 42–48.Google Scholar
- Anon. 1985. More convenience in food packaging. Futurist 19 (4): 60.Google Scholar
- Anon. 1975. Chemical resistance of many common plastics. Plastic World 33 (2): 27.Google Scholar
- Cole, P. 1988. Focus on flexibles: there’s no stopping plastics. Canadian Packaging 41 (4): 22–27.Google Scholar
- Erickson, G. 1990. New trends make food a challenging game. Packaging 35 (1): 44–48.Google Scholar
- Henning, H. F. et al. 1976. Toxicity of polymers and polymer raw materials. Chemistry and Industry (UK) 11 (6/5): 463–473.Google Scholar
- Hu, K. H. and Breyer, J. B. 1972. Pinhole resistance of flexibles. Modern Packaging 45 (1): 47–49.Google Scholar
- McCarron, R. M. 1972. Package that smells isn’t package that sells. Candy and Snack Industry 137 (10): 54.Google Scholar
- Paris, E. 1984. Packaging (plastic upsurge). Forbes 133 (1): 224–226.Google Scholar
- Pintauro, N. D. and Simha, A. H. 1976. Teamwork: your key to longer shelf life. Package Engineering 21 (4): 38–40.Google Scholar
- Shaw, F. B. 1977. Toxicological considerations in the selection of flexible packaging materials for foodstuffs. Journal of Food Protection 40 (1): 65–68.Google Scholar
- Tzouwara-Karayanni, S. et al. 1987. Adsorption of vinyl chloride onto plasticized PVC by classical partition in the presence of various food simulating solvents. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft and Technologie 20 (4): 202–206.Google Scholar