Recent Results of (n,p) Studies at Intermediate Energies

  • J. Rapaport


In recent years charge-exchange reactions from nuclei at intermediate energies have been the subject of intensive studies. At these energies, isovector spin excitations are preferentially induced in nuclei making these reactions extremely sensitive to these aspects of nuclear structure. At the last Telluride conference, Jackson and Celler (1) reported on the (n,p) reaction as a probe of nuclear structure. New results will be presented here, mainly those obtained with the recently implemented white neutron source at LAMPF-WNR.


Beta Decay Giant Dipole Resonance Shell Model Calculation Unit Cross Section Nuclear Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K.P. Jackson and A. Celler, in “Spin Observables of Nuclear Probes”, ed. by C.J. Horowitz, C.D. Goodman and C.E. Walker (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.N. Taddeucci et al., Nucl. Phys. A469 (1987) 125.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Ullmann et al., to be published.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.W. Lisowski et al., Nucl. Sci. and Eng. 106 (1990) 208.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.S. Henderson et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A257 (1987) 97.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Rapaport, in Fundamental Symmetries and Nuclear Structure, ed. by J.N. Ginocchio and S.P. Rosen, World Scientific, 1989 p. 186.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.K. Park et al., to be published, BAPS 35 (1990) 1650.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Ling et al., to be published.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sorenson et al., to be published, BAPS 34 (1989) 1834.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rapaport et al., Phys. Rev. C 41 (1990) 1920.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.W. Watson et al., Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) 22.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.M. Mildenberger et al., Phys. Rev. C 43 (1991) 1777.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Nakayama and W.G. Love, Phys. Rev. C 38 (1988) 51.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B.D. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. C 36 (1987) 2195.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Auerbach and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. C 30 (1984) 1032.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Gaarde et al., Nucl. Phys. A422 (1984) 189.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    F.P. Brady et al., Phys. Rev. C 31 (1991).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.R. Comfort and B.C. Karp, Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 2162.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Franey and G.A. Love, Phys. Rev. C 31 (1985) 488.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Hicks et al., Phys. Rev. C, to be published.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Ahrens et al., Nucl. Phys. A251 (1975) 479.ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Baker et al., Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) 1877.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.J. Horowitz and D.P. Murdock, Phys. Rev. C 37 (1988) 2032.ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. Brieva and G. Love, Phys. Rev. C 42 (1990) 2573; F. Brieva (private communication).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Rapaport
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations