Advertisement

Experimental Embryology In Leeches: Cellular and Molecular Approaches

  • Susanna Blackshaw
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 195)

Abstract

Among the annelids, glossiphoniid leeches, and in particular Helobdella triserialis, have become a favorite preparation for modern experimental embryology, and are currently used both for cellular and molecular genetic studies of development. The principal adventages of Helobdella as a model organism accrue from the large cells and well defined lineages, important experimental advantages lacking in animal species such as Drosophila. The eggs of glossiphoniid leeches are relatively large and the yolk of the egg is the major nutrient source for the developing embryo, enabling embryos to be cultured separately from the parent in a simple salt solution. Development from egg to adult is direct with no intervening trochophore or metamorphosis seen in polychaet annelids. The early embryos comprise large cells that are individually identifiable and accessible to experimental manipulation. Their suitability as experimental material was recognised by Charles Whitman in the 1890’s (Whitman, 1878). On the basis of his observations in the light microscope on the early cleavage of a glossiphoniid leech egg, Whitman first stated the idea that each identified cell in the early embryo is developmentally distinct and that each identified blastomere and the clone of its descendant cells plays a specific predestined role in later development. In the 1970’s, new techniques for lineage analysis by intracellular injection of tracers were developed using leeches. This has enabled the construction of detailed lineages for identified cells of the early embryo. Subsequent experimental work has been concerned with: the role of cytoplasmic determinants, the relative roles of cell ancestry and cell interactions in determining developmental fate, and the control of cell cycle in embryonic cells. Recently, Helobdella has also been used for molecular genetic studies of development. Highly conserved homeoboxes from Drosophila genes have been used to identify genes in Helobdella that may be important for regulating development.

Keywords

Early Embryo Blast Cell Molecular Genetic Study Peripheral Neuron Lineage Tracer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.T., 1973, Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Astrow, S., Holton, B. and Weisblat, D.A., 1987, Centrifugation redistributes factors determining cleavage patterns in leech embryos, Dev. Biol., 120: 270–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakier, H., and Pedersen, R.A., 1982, Allocation of cells to inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in preimplantation mouse embryo, Dev. Biol., 90: 352–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bissen, S.T., and Weisblat, D.A., 1987, Early differences between alternate blast cells in leech embryo, J. Neurobiol., 18 (3): 251–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bissen, S.T., and Weisblat, D.A., 1989, The durations and compositions of cell cycles in embryos of the leech, Helobdella triserialis, Development, 106: 105–118.Google Scholar
  6. Blackshaw, S.E., 1987, Organisation and development of the peripheral nervous system in annelids, in: “Nervous systems in Invertebrates,” ed M.Ali, NATO-ASI series, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Blackshaw, S.E., 1988, Cell lineages and the development of identified neurones in the leech, in: “The making of the nervous system,” Eds.J.G. Parnavelas, C.D.Stern and R.V.Stirling, Oxford University Press, 22–51.Google Scholar
  8. Blackshaw, S.E.,and Warner, A.E., 1976, Low resistance junctions between mesoderm cells during development of trunk muscles, J. Physiol., 255: 209–230.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, S.S., 1982, Interactions between mesoderm and ectoderm in segment formation in the embryo of a glossiphoniid leech, Dev. Biol., 89: 389–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blair, S.S., 1983, Blastomere ablation and the developmental origin of identified monoamine-containing neurones in the leech, Dev. Biol., 95: 65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blair, S.S., and Weisblat, D.A., 1982, Ectodermal interactions during neurogenesis in the glossiphoniid leech Helobdella triserialis, Dev. Biol., 91: 64–72.Google Scholar
  12. Dalcq, A., and Pasteels, J., 1955, Determination photometrique de 1a teneur relative en DNA des noyaux dans les oeufs en segmentation du rat et de 1a souris, Expl.Cell Res. Suppl., 3: 72–97.Google Scholar
  13. Davidson, E.H., 1976, Gene activity in early development, 3rd Ed.Academic Press Inc.London Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. DiNardo, S., Kuner, J., Theis, J., and O’Farrell, P., 1985, Development of embryonic pattern in D. melanogaster asGoogle Scholar
  15. revealed by accumulation of the nuclear engrailed protein, Cell, 43:59–69.Google Scholar
  16. Edgar, B.A., and Schubiger, G., 1986, Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development, Cell, 44: 871–877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edgar, B.A., and McGhee, J.D., 1988, DNA synthesis and the control of embryonic gene expression in C. elegans, Cell, 53: 589–599.Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez, J., 1980, Embryonic development of the glossiphoniid leech Theromyzon rude: characterisation of developmental stages, Dev. Biol., 76: 245–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandez, J., and O1ea, N., 1982, Embryonic development of glossiphoniid leeches, in: “Developmental biology of freshwater invertebrates,” Eds. F.W.Harrison and R.C.Cowden, Liss, New York, 317–361.Google Scholar
  20. Fernandez, J., and Stent, G.S., 1980, Embryonic development of the glossiphoniid leech Theromyzon rude: structure and development of the germinal bands, Dev. Biol., 78: 407–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foe, V.E., and Alberts, B.M., 1983, Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the 5 mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis, J. Cell Sci., 61: 31–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fraser, S.E., 1985, Gap junctions and cell interactions during development, TINS, 79: 3–4.Google Scholar
  23. Gehring,W.J., 1987, Homeoboxes in the study of development, Science, 236: 1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gimlich, R.L., and Braun, J., 1985, Improved fluorescent compounds for tracing cell lineage, Dev. Biol., 109: 509–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, C.F., and Morgan, R.W., 1966, Changes in the cell cycle during early amphibian development, Dev. Biol., 14: 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hinegardner, R.T., Rao, B., and Feldman, D.E., 1964, The DNA synthetic period during early development of the sea urchin egg, Exptl. Cell Res., 36: 53–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ho, R.K., and Weisblat, D.A., 1987, A provisional epithelium in leech embryo: cellular origins and influence on a developmental equivalence group, Dev. Biol., 120: 520–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holton, B., Astrow, S.H., and Weisblat, D.A., 1989, Animal and vegetal teloplasms mix in the early embryo of the leech Helobdella triserialis, Dev. Biol., 131: 182–188.Google Scholar
  29. Kimmel, C.B., and Warga, R.M., 1986, Tissue specific cell lineages originate in the gastrula of the zebrafish, Science, 231: 365–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Romberg, T., 1981, Engrailed: A gene controlling compartment and segment formation in Drosophila, PNAS 78: 1095–1099.Google Scholar
  31. Romberg, T., Siden, I., O’Farrell, P., and Simon, M., 1985, The engrailed locus of Drosophila: In situ localisation of transcripts reveals compartment specific expression, Cell, 40: 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller, R.J., and McMahan, U.J., 1976, The shapes of sensory and motor neurones and the distribution of their synapses in ganglia of the leech: a study using intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase, Proc. R. Soc. B., 194: 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishida, H., and Satoh, N., 1983, Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. I. Up to the 8 cell stage, Dev. Biol., 99: 382–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pardee, A.B., 1974, A constriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation, P.N.A.S., 71: 1286–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pardee, A.B., 1974, A constriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation, P.N.A.S., 71: 1286–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prescott, D.M., 1976, The cell cycle and the control of cellular reproduction, Adv. Genet, 18: 99–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schliep, W., 1914, Die Entwicklung zentrifugierter Eier von Clepsine sexoculata, Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Ontog. Tiere, 37: 236–253.Google Scholar
  38. Schliep, W., 1914, Die Entwicklung zentrifugierter Eier von Clepsine sexoculata, Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Ontog. Tiere, 37: 236–253.Google Scholar
  39. Shankland, M., and Weisblat, D.A., 1984, Stepwise commitment of blast cell fates during the positional specification of the O and P cell lines in the leech embryo, Dev. Biol., 106: 326–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shankland, M., 1987a, Determination of cleavage pattern in embryonic blast cells of the leech, Dev. Biol., 120: 494–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shankland,M., 1987b, Differentiation of the O and P cell lines in the embryo of the leech. I. Sequential commitment of blast cell lineages, Dev. Biol., 123: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shankland, M., 1987c, Differentiation of the O and P cell lines in the embryo of the leech. II. Genealogical relationship of descendant pattern elements in alternative developmental pathways, Dev. Biol., 123: 97–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stent, G.S., Weisblat, D.A., Blair, S.S., and Zackson, S.L., 1982, Cell lineage in the development of the leech nervous system, in;“Neuronal Development,” Ed. N. Spitzer, Plenum Press, New York, 1–44. Adv. Physiol., 10:87–123.Google Scholar
  44. Van den Bigelaar, J.A.M., 1971, Timing of the phases of the cell cycle during the period of asynchronous division up to the 49-cell stage in Lymnaea, JEEM, 26: 367–391.Google Scholar
  45. Warner, A.E., 1984, Physiological approaches to early development, Recent Adv. Physiol., 10: 87–123.Google Scholar
  46. Warner, A.E., and Lawrence, P.A., 1982, Permeability of gap junctions at the segmental border in insect epidermis, Cell 28: 243–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warner, A.E., and Lawrence, P.A., 1982, Permeability of gap junctions at the segmental border in insect epidermis, Cell 28: 243–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisblat, D.A., 1981, Development of the nervous system. In: “Neurobiology of the leech,” Eds.K.J.Müller, J.G. Nicholls and G.S. Stent, Cold Spring Harbor Publications, New York, 173–196.Google Scholar
  49. Weisblat, D.A., Sawyer, R., and Stent, G.S., 1978, Cell lineage analysis by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme, Science, 202: 1295–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weisblat, D.A., Zackson, S.S., Blair, S.S., and Young, J.D., 1980, Cell lineage analysis by intracellular injection of fluorescent tracers, Science, 209: 1538–1541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weisblat, D.A., and Shankland, M., 1985, Cell lineage and segmentation in the leech, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B. 312: 39–56.Google Scholar
  52. Weisblat, D.A., Price, D.J., and Wedeen, C.J., 1988, Segmentation in leech development, Development 104, Supplement, 161–168.Google Scholar
  53. Whitman, C.O., 1878, The embryology of Clepsine, Q. J. Micros. Sci., 18: 215–315.Google Scholar
  54. Wordeman, L., 1982, Kinetics of primary blast cell production in the embryo of the leech Helobdella triserialis. Honors Thesis, Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  55. Zackson, S.L., 1984, Cell lineage, cell-cell interactions and segment formation in the ectoderm of a glossiphoniid leech embryo, Dev. Biol., 104: 143–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanna Blackshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologySchool of Biological Sciences, University of GlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations