Advertisement

The Gamma-Ray Laser — Status and Issues in 1989

  • C. B. Collins
  • J. J. Carroll
  • M. J. Byrd
  • K. N. Taylor
  • T. W. Sinor
  • F. Davanloo
  • J. J. Coogan
  • C. Hong

Abstract

Efforts to demonstrate the feasibility of a gamma-ray laser scored major advances in 1988 and 1989. Culminating with the discovery of giant pumping resonances below 4 MeV for dumping isomeric populations, priority issues were brought into better focus by the lessons learned from a wealth of new results. Perceptions were advanced so greatly that we must reassess the critical issues for the 1990’s. Only the bottom line remains the same. A gamma-ray laser is feasible if the right combination of energy levels occurs in some real material. The likelihood of this favorable arrangement has been markedly increased by the experimental results to date.

Keywords

Partial Width Integrate Cross Section Activation Edge Endpoint Energy Bremsstrahlung Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. B. Collins, F. W. Lee, D. M. Shemwell, B. D. DePaola, S. Olariu, and I. I. Popescu, The Coherent and Incoherent Pumping of a Gamma Ray-Laser with Intense Optical Radiation, J. Appl. Phys. 53:4645 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. A. Anderson and C. B. Collins, Calibration of Pulsed BremsStrahlung Spectra with Photonuclear Reactions of 77Se and 79Br, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58:2157 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. A. Anderson and C. B. Collins, Calibration of Pulsed X-Ray Spectra, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59:414 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. B. Collins, J. A. Anderson, Y. Paiss C. D. Eberhard, R. J. Peterson, and W. L. Hodge, Activation of 115Inm by Single Pulses of Intense BremsStrahlung, Phys. Rev. C 38:1852 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. Anderson, M. J. Byrd, and C. B. Collins, Activation of 111Cdm by Single Pulses of Intense Bremsstrahlung, Phys. Rev. C 38:2838 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. B. W. Cameron, “Essays in Nuclear Astrophysics,” C. A. Barnes, D. D. Clayton, and D. N. Schramm, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Browne, Nucl. Data Sheets 52:127 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. B. Collins, C. D. Eberhard, J. W. Glesener, and J. A. Anderson, Depopulation of the Isomeric State 180Tam by the Reaction 180Tam(γ,γ′)180Ta, Phys. Rev. C 37:2267 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. J. Carroll, J. A. Anderson, J. W. Glesener, C. D. Eberhard, and C. B. Collins, Accelerated Decay of 180Tam and 176Lu in Stellar Interiors through (γ,γ′) Reactions, Astrophvs. J. 344:454 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. C. Booth and J. Brownson, Electron and Photon Excitation of Nuclear Isomers, Nucl. Phys. A98:529 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Girod, J. P. Delaroche, D. Gogny, and J. F. Berger, Hartree-Foch-Bogoliubov Predictions for Shape Isomerism in Nonfissile Even-Even Nuclei, Phvs. Rev. Lett. 62:2452 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. B. Collins
    • 1
  • J. J. Carroll
    • 1
  • M. J. Byrd
    • 1
  • K. N. Taylor
    • 1
  • T. W. Sinor
    • 1
  • F. Davanloo
    • 1
  • J. J. Coogan
    • 1
  • C. Hong
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Quantum ElectronicsUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations