A First Step Towards the Automation of SSM?
A strength of SSM lies in the hermeneutic/phenomenological process of inquiry. The methodology is an operationalisation of Vicker’s notion of appreciation which helps both practitioner and client(s) to gain an understanding of the perceived problem situation. The appreciative process applies equally to the practitioner as it does to the client(s) and seems to rely to a great extent upon the interaction that takes place between them. An important feature of SSM is that it offers a means of appreciating the problem without imposing the structure of some predetermined model. It would seem therefore, that the idea of automating SSM is dialectically opposed to the principles that underpin the methodology. However, an investigation has been undertaken to explore the possibilities of applying information technology to some aspects of the methodology. This paper will describe the research which has explored the possibility of incorporating the methodology within an expert system framework.
KeywordsExpert System Tutor System Soft System Methodology Rich Picture Viable System Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- ATKINSON, C.J. (1986), Towards a Plurality of Soft Systems Methodology, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, vol 13. ppl9–31.Google Scholar
- ANDERTON, R (1990), The need for the Formal Development of the VSM, in “The Viable System Model”, (Ed. R. Espejo and R. Harnden) Wiley: Chichester, pp39–50.Google Scholar
- BELL, J and HARDEMAN, R.J (1989), The Third Role, in “The Naturalistic Knowledge Engineer, Knowledge Elicitation, Principles Techniques and Applications. (Ed. D. DIAPER). Ellis Harwood Ltd. Chichester, pp 49–85.Google Scholar
- BRYANT, N. (1988), “Managing Expert Systems”, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- CHECKLAND, P.B. (1989), “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- CHECKLAND, P.B. (1989), Soft Systems Methodology, in “Rational Analysis for a Problematic World” (Ed. J. Rosenhead) Wiley, Chichester pp71–100).Google Scholar
- HART, A. (1986), “Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems”, Kogan PageGoogle Scholar
- JACKSON, P. (1986), “Introduction to Expert Systems”, Addison-Wesley: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- OPEN UNIVERSITY T301 BLOCK IV., The Soft Systems Approach, “Soft Systems Analysis: An Introductory Guide”.Google Scholar
- STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. (1990), The Contribution of Systems Ideas during the Process of Knowledge Elicitation, in “Systems Prospects. The Next Ten Years of Systems Research”, (Eds: R.L FLOOD, M.C JACKSON AND P. KEYS), Plenham Press: New York.Google Scholar
- STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. 1988b, Expert systems and the Systems Epistemomolgy, in “Cybernetics and Systems; pt2”, (Ed.R. TRAPPL) Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 941.Google Scholar
- STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. (1989), Expert systems: Ramifications for the Knowledge Engineer, Systems Analysis, Modelling and Simulation. Vol 6, No9, East Germany, pp673–678.Google Scholar
- STOWELL, F.A. (1991), Towards Client-Led Development of Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems, (In press).Google Scholar
- VICKERS, G. (1983),“The Art of Judgement:A study of Policy Making”—Harper and Row: London.Google Scholar
- WATERMAN, D.A. (1986),“A Guide to Expert Systems”, Addison Wesley Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- WELLBANK, M. (1983),“A Review of Knowledge Acquisition Techniques for Expert Systems, Ipswich: Martlesham Consultancy Services.Google Scholar
- WEST, D. (1990), Knowledge Elicitation as an Inquiring System: Towards a Knowledge Elicitation Methodology, The 34th Annual Conference of the International Society for Systems Science. 8th–13th July, Portland Oreqan, U.S.A.Google Scholar