Advertisement

A First Step Towards the Automation of SSM?

  • F. A. Stowell
  • Mark Stansfield

Abstract

A strength of SSM lies in the hermeneutic/phenomenological process of inquiry. The methodology is an operationalisation of Vicker’s notion of appreciation which helps both practitioner and client(s) to gain an understanding of the perceived problem situation. The appreciative process applies equally to the practitioner as it does to the client(s) and seems to rely to a great extent upon the interaction that takes place between them. An important feature of SSM is that it offers a means of appreciating the problem without imposing the structure of some predetermined model. It would seem therefore, that the idea of automating SSM is dialectically opposed to the principles that underpin the methodology. However, an investigation has been undertaken to explore the possibilities of applying information technology to some aspects of the methodology. This paper will describe the research which has explored the possibility of incorporating the methodology within an expert system framework.

Keywords

Expert System Tutor System Soft System Methodology Rich Picture Viable System Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ATKINSON, C.J. (1986), Towards a Plurality of Soft Systems Methodology, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, vol 13. ppl9–31.Google Scholar
  2. ANDERTON, R (1990), The need for the Formal Development of the VSM, in “The Viable System Model”, (Ed. R. Espejo and R. Harnden) Wiley: Chichester, pp39–50.Google Scholar
  3. BELL, J and HARDEMAN, R.J (1989), The Third Role, in “The Naturalistic Knowledge Engineer, Knowledge Elicitation, Principles Techniques and Applications. (Ed. D. DIAPER). Ellis Harwood Ltd. Chichester, pp 49–85.Google Scholar
  4. BRYANT, N. (1988), “Managing Expert Systems”, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. CHECKLAND, P.B. (1989), “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. CHECKLAND, P.B. (1989), Soft Systems Methodology, in “Rational Analysis for a Problematic World” (Ed. J. Rosenhead) Wiley, Chichester pp71–100).Google Scholar
  7. HART, A. (1986), “Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems”, Kogan PageGoogle Scholar
  8. JACKSON, P. (1986), “Introduction to Expert Systems”, Addison-Wesley: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. OPEN UNIVERSITY T301 BLOCK IV., The Soft Systems Approach, “Soft Systems Analysis: An Introductory Guide”.Google Scholar
  10. STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. (1990), The Contribution of Systems Ideas during the Process of Knowledge Elicitation, in “Systems Prospects. The Next Ten Years of Systems Research”, (Eds: R.L FLOOD, M.C JACKSON AND P. KEYS), Plenham Press: New York.Google Scholar
  11. STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. 1988b, Expert systems and the Systems Epistemomolgy, in “Cybernetics and Systems; pt2”, (Ed.R. TRAPPL) Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 941.Google Scholar
  12. STOWELL, F.A and WEST, D. (1989), Expert systems: Ramifications for the Knowledge Engineer, Systems Analysis, Modelling and Simulation. Vol 6, No9, East Germany, pp673–678.Google Scholar
  13. STOWELL, F.A. (1991), Towards Client-Led Development of Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems, (In press).Google Scholar
  14. VICKERS, G. (1983),“The Art of Judgement:A study of Policy Making”—Harper and Row: London.Google Scholar
  15. WATERMAN, D.A. (1986),“A Guide to Expert Systems”, Addison Wesley Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  16. WELLBANK, M. (1983),“A Review of Knowledge Acquisition Techniques for Expert Systems, Ipswich: Martlesham Consultancy Services.Google Scholar
  17. WEST, D. (1990), Knowledge Elicitation as an Inquiring System: Towards a Knowledge Elicitation Methodology, The 34th Annual Conference of the International Society for Systems Science. 8th–13th July, Portland Oreqan, U.S.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. A. Stowell
    • 1
  • Mark Stansfield
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information ScienceScience Faculty Portsmouth PolytechnicPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations