Action and Structure in Problem Solving

  • Raul Espejo

Abstract

The concern with problem situations is a response to their pervasive nature. A hallmark of human activities is that they are experienced as problematic. In the quest for stability people in general find that they need to bring about some kind of change in the situations of their concern. This quest is much more than countering perceived threats or apprehending opportunities of one kind or another. The constant flux of emotions, the outcomes of on-going interactions, the buffeting of new stimuli, the emergence of new ideas, the fears of the unknown, and a wealth of other factors are responsible for changing expectations about what experiences are acceptable and desirable. As these expectations are not fulfilled by their actions, people start to recognise problem situations; instabilities, that may be construed as opportunities or threats, requiring their creative capacity to deal with them.

Keywords

Europe Sonal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff R 1978 The Art of Problem Solving, NY, WileyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby R 1964 An Introduction to Cybernetics, London, MethuenGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer S 1979 The Heart of Enterprise, Chichester, WileyGoogle Scholar
  4. RJ Boland RA Hirschheim 1987 Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Chichester, WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. Checkland P 1981 Systems Thinking. Systems Practice, Chichester, WileyGoogle Scholar
  6. Eden C, S Jones & D Sims1983 Messing About in Problems, Oxford, Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Espejo R 1987 From Machines to People and Organisations, in New Directions in Management Science Eds. M Jackson and P Keys, U.K. GowerGoogle Scholar
  8. Espejo R 1989 Cybernetic Methodology for Problem Solving, Unpublished Monograph, Aston Business School. Birmingham, U.K.Google Scholar
  9. Espejo R 1991 Strategy, Structure and Information Management, in Espejo R. and M. Schwaninger eds. Organisational Fitness: Corporate Effectiveness through Management Cybernetics, Frankfurt/New York, Campus (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  10. Giddens A 1984 The Constitution of Society, Cambridge, Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Kidd, J. (ed) 1985 Managing with O.R., London, Philip AllenGoogle Scholar
  12. Kling R 1987 Defining the Boundaries of Computing Across Complex Organisations in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research Eds RJ Boland and RA Hirschheim, Chichester, WileyGoogle Scholar
  13. Maturana H 1987 Everything Is Said by an Observer, in Gaia: A way of knowing, ed. by WI Thompson, California, Lindisfarne PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Maturana H & F Varela 1980 Autopoes is and Cognition: the Realisation of the Living. Boston, ReidelGoogle Scholar
  15. Miser H & E Quade 1985 Handbook of Systems Analysis: Overview of Uses. Procedures and Practice, Chichester, WileyGoogle Scholar
  16. Vickers G 1965 The Art of Judgement, London, Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  17. Vickers G 1972 Freedom in a Rocking Boat, Middlesex U.K. Pelican BooksGoogle Scholar
  18. Von Foester H 1979 Cybernetics of Cybernetics in Klaus Krippendorff (ed) Communications and Control in Society, New York, Gordon and BreachGoogle Scholar
  19. Walsham G & Chun-Kwong Han 1990 Strueturation Theory and Information Systems Research, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Systems, IFIP, Copenhagen, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  20. Wiener N 1961 Cybernetics, Cambridge, Mass. MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raul Espejo
    • 1
  1. 1.Aston Management CentreAston UniversityBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations