Advertisement

The Quality Assurance of Superconducting Wire and Cable for SSC Magnets

  • Douglas A. Pollock
  • Penny Baggett
  • Donald CaponeII

Abstract

The success of the SSC depends on the consistency and uniformity of the superconducting magnets used in the main collider rings and the high energy booster. To a great extent the success of the magnets depends upon the quality of the superconductor wire and cable used in coil windings. As the SSC project has begun its transition from Research to Development, a new laboratory organization has been established to carry the design requirements from concept to reality. The SSCL Magnet Systems Division Quality Assurance Group has been working on the development of a quality management and analysis system for insuring superconductor uniformity through the understanding and control of manufacturing variation. Key areas of the QA activity include: 1.) the design and development of a computer database and analysis system for the collection and statistical analysis of superconductor materials data (containing: source physical and chemical properties, billet process history, and final product performance data); and 2.) the development of wire and cable product specifications which focus on the control of variation. As a result of this work several new concepts have been developed which will affect the traditional approach to superconductor wire and cable production.

Keywords

Superconductor Material Data Flow Diagram Cable Performance Superconductor Wire NbTi Wire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Request for Proposal SSC-90-A-000573, Development and Production for Superconducting Wire and Cable, SSCL, September 7, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SSCL-SR-1056, Site-Specific Conceptual Design Report, July 1990, Table 4.2.1.1-1, pg. 286.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Pollock (SSCL). Introduction to the SSCL MSD QA Group. Presentation to US Industry, April 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Pollock. Collider Dipole Conducton A review of Current Quality Assurance Issues. Presentation to Japanese Industry, July 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Ferbel (Chairman). General Remarks on the Organization and Contents of the Proposed Cable Data Base. SSC-N-582, March 23, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MJ. Baggett (BNL), R. Leedy, C. Saltmarsh, J. Tompkins (SSCL). The Magnet Components Database System. IISSC 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Pollock. Database Development and Quality Analysis: A report on recent efforts to establish a Quality Information System at the SSCL. Magnet Systems Integration Meeting (MSIM) Presentation at LBL, January 17, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Pollock. SSC Cable Database System, (dBaseIII Plus application programs and data files).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Current SSCL CDM Conductor Specifications: NbTi Bars, SSC-Mag-M-4000A; Nb Barrier, SSC-Mag-M-4001; NbTi Wire (Inner), SSC-Mag-M-4145; NbTi Wire (Outer), SSC-Mag-M-4146; NbTi Cable (Inner), SSC-Mag-M-4147; NbTi Cable (Outer), SSC-Mag-M-4148, Seller Quality Assurance Requirements, SSCL QA-1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Pollock, Superconductor Critical Current Variation: A review of current work on the study of SSC Conductor Variation, as described by Critical Current and related parameters. MSIM Presentation at SSCL, March 20, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SYSTAT, Version 5.0 for DOS. Copyright @ 1990, SYSTAT, Inc. 1800 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201-3793.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Pollock, Superconductor Wire & Cable Quality Assurance Activities. MSIM Presentation at SSCL, November 13, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Velleman and D. Hoaglin. Applications, Basics, and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis. Boston, MA Duxbury Press, PWS Publishers, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Wilkinson. SYGRAPH: The System for Graphics. Evanston, IL. SYSTAT, Inc., 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Garber, et.al. (BNL). Superconductor Cable Critical Current Measurements.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Erdmann (SSCL), etal. Quantification of Systematic Errors In Ic Testing, IISSC, V-F-9, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Greene, (BNL). Discussions on RHIC and SSC conductor specification development, meeting February 8, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Capone (SSCL), et.al. Cable Specification Review Meeting, held at LBL, January 17, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas A. Pollock
    • 1
  • Penny Baggett
    • 1
  • Donald CaponeII
    • 1
  1. 1.Superconducting Super Collider LaboratoryDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations